QoS in Next Generation Mobile Networks: An Analytical Study

Two of the major challenges for next-generation mobile systems are to achieve seamless mobility management in next generation wireless networks and to manage resources efficiently given the exponential growth that mobile data traffic has experienced over the last few years. To track host mobility, the IETF has made important efforts to develop mobility management protocols such as Mobile IPv6 and Proxy Mobile IPv6. These protocols establish a tunnel to connect the mobile node with its correspondent node. The tunneling method provided by MPLS can be profitably used to take advantage of MPLS traffic engineering capabilities in order to achieve faster re-routing when a mobile node changes its point of attachment to the network. Moreover, in order to deal with increasing mobile traffic demand, mobility management network architectures are being redesigned towards a more distributed operation. Given these scenarios, service disruption during handoffs continues to cause excessive packet loss that needs minimizing in order to support quality of service requirements for emerging applications. In this paper, a qualitative and quantitative analyses of the most representative host-based and network-based mobility management approaches is presented, including recent distributed mobility management approaches.

[1]  Jean-Marie Bonnin,et al.  Host-based distributed mobility management support protocol for IPv6 mobile networks , 2012, 2012 IEEE 8th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob).

[2]  Rami Langar,et al.  Mobility management support and performance analysis for wireless MPLS networks , 2006, Int. J. Netw. Manag..

[3]  Wen-Tsuen Chen,et al.  Architecture for mobility and QoS support in all-IP wireless networks , 2004, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[4]  P. Krachodnok,et al.  A Recovery Scheme for QoS Guaranteed Mobile IP Over MPLS Network , 2006, 2006 1st International Symposium on Wireless Pervasive Computing.

[5]  Eric C. Rosen,et al.  Multiprotocol Label Switching Architecture , 2001, RFC.

[6]  Saurabh Bagchi,et al.  Distributed mobility management for efficient video delivery over all-IP mobile networks: Competing approaches , 2013, IEEE Network.

[7]  H. Hassanein,et al.  Extensions for Internet QoS paradigms to mobile IP: a survey , 2005, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[8]  Chen-Khong Tham,et al.  Integration of mobile IP and multi-protocol label switching , 2001, ICC 2001. IEEE International Conference on Communications. Conference Record (Cat. No.01CH37240).

[9]  Javier Carmona-Murillo,et al.  Performance evaluation of an architecture for localized IP mobility management , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Network and Service Management.

[10]  Rajeev Koodli,et al.  Fast Handovers for Mobile IPv6 , 2001, RFC.

[11]  Frank Xia,et al.  Fast Handovers for Proxy Mobile IPv6 , 2010, RFC.

[12]  Rami Langar,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of mobility management in MPLS-based wireless access networks , 2008, TNET.

[13]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Mobility support in IPv6 , 1996, MobiCom '96.

[14]  Stefano Giordano,et al.  Network-Based Micro-Mobility in Wireless Mesh Networks: Is MPLS Convenient? , 2009, GLOBECOM 2009 - 2009 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[15]  Rahul Vaidya,et al.  Network-based mobility management in the evolved 3GPP core network , 2009, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[16]  Telemaco Melia,et al.  Distributed mobility management: A standards landscape , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[17]  Alejandro Quintero,et al.  MPLS Based Architecture for Mobility and End-to-End QoS Support in Fourth Generation Mobile Networks , 2009 .