Multi-Modal Uterine-Activity Measurements for Prediction of Embryo Implantation by Machine Learning

In-vitro fertilization (IVF) is the most advanced treatment for infertility problems; however, its failure rate is still above 70% and the exact causes are often unknown. There is increasing evidence of the involvement of uterine contractions in IVF failure, especially during and after embryo transfer (ET). In this paper, we propose a new method to predict the success of IVF based on quantitative features extracted from electrohysterography (EHG) and B-mode transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) recordings. To this end, probabilistic classification of the uterine activity, as either favorable or adverse to embryo implantation, is investigated using machine learning. Prior to machine learning, an additional method for EHG and TVUS feature extraction is here proposed that is based on singular value decomposition of the acquired EHG and TVUS recordings. Sixteen women were measured during three phases of the IVF treatment: follicular stimulation (FS), one hour before embryo transfer (ET1), and five to seven days after ET (ET5-7). After feature space reduction by correlation filtering, three machine-learning models, namely, support vector machine (SVM), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), and Gaussian mixture model (GMM), were optimized and tested by nested leave-one-out cross validation for their ability to predict successful embryo implantation. The highest accuracy (93.8%) was achieved by KNN in all phases and by SVM and in the FS and ET1 phases. Contraction frequency, unnormalized first moment and standard deviation, obtained from EHG and TVUS analysis, were the best features selected by the three classifiers. Our results show a multi-modal, multi-parametric strategy based on quantitative features to represent a novel, promising option for prediction of successful embryo implantation, overcoming the limitations of alternative approaches based on qualitative assessment of clinical variables. Yet, a larger dataset is required for improved training of the classifiers, as well as to assess their clinical value in the context of IVF procedures.

[1]  G. Dunselman,et al.  Relation between endometrial wavelike activity and fecundability in spontaneous cycles. , 1997, Fertility and sterility.

[2]  Massimo Mischi,et al.  Analysis of Vibration Exercise at Varying Frequencies by Different Fatigue Estimators , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[3]  C Marque,et al.  Uterine electromyography: a critical review. , 1993, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[4]  Markus Neuhäuser,et al.  Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test , 2006 .

[5]  Shuang Song,et al.  Influence of Electrode Placement on Signal Quality for Ambulatory Pregnancy Monitoring , 2014, Comput. Math. Methods Medicine.

[6]  J. Stanger,et al.  Potentially important variables identified by transvaginal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer. , 1997, Human reproduction.

[7]  M. Mischi,et al.  Novel Vibration-Exercise Instrument With Dedicated Adaptive Filtering for Electromyographic Investigation of Neuromuscular Activation , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[8]  R. Garfield,et al.  Electrical Activity of the Human Uterus During Pregnancy as Recorded from the Abdominal Surface , 1997, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  G. Dunselman,et al.  Endometrial wave direction switch and the outcome of in vitro fertilization. , 1999, Fertility and sterility.

[10]  Dimitrios I. Fotiadis,et al.  Machine learning applications in cancer prognosis and prediction , 2014, Computational and structural biotechnology journal.

[11]  Joel Grus,et al.  Data Science from Scratch: First Principles with Python , 2015 .

[12]  C. Flamigni,et al.  Characteristics of uterine contractility during menses in women with mild to moderate endometriosis. , 2002, Fertility and sterility.

[13]  L. Gianaroli,et al.  Social determinants of human reproduction. , 2001, Human reproduction.

[14]  D. Pietrowski,et al.  Endometrial Receptivity and its Predictive Value for IVF/ICSI-Outcome. , 2012, Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde.

[15]  Reza Ferdousi,et al.  A Review of Machine Learning Approaches in Assisted Reproductive Technologies , 2019, Acta informatica medica : AIM : journal of the Society for Medical Informatics of Bosnia & Herzegovina : casopis Drustva za medicinsku informatiku BiH.

[16]  T. Var,et al.  Treatment with oxytocin antagonists before embryo transfer may increase implantation rates after IVF. , 2010, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[17]  S. Shapiro,et al.  An Analysis of Variance Test for Normality (Complete Samples) , 1965 .

[18]  R. Fanchin,et al.  Uterine contractions at the time of embryo transfer alter pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization. , 1998, Human reproduction.

[19]  Massimo Mischi,et al.  Feasibility of Transabdominal Electrohysterography for Analysis of Uterine Activity in Nonpregnant Women , 2018, Reproductive Sciences.

[20]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  An Introduction to Statistical Learning , 2013, Springer Texts in Statistics.

[21]  Sung Hye Kim,et al.  Oxytocin Receptor Antagonists, Atosiban and Nolasiban, Inhibit Prostaglandin F2α-induced Contractions and Inflammatory Responses in Human Myometrium , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[22]  Massimo Mischi,et al.  Uterine peristalsis and fertility: current knowledge and future perspectives: a review and meta-analysis. , 2017, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[23]  G. Dunselman,et al.  Endometrial wavelike movements during the menstrual cycle. , 1996, Fertility and sterility.

[24]  G. Dunselman,et al.  Subendometrial contractions in the nonpregnant uterus: an ultrasound study. , 1996, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[25]  M. Mischi,et al.  Propagation of electrical activity in uterine muscle during pregnancy: a review , 2015, Acta physiologica.

[26]  Takaya Saito,et al.  The Precision-Recall Plot Is More Informative than the ROC Plot When Evaluating Binary Classifiers on Imbalanced Datasets , 2015, PloS one.

[27]  G. Raven,et al.  Junctional zone contractions and embryo transfer: is it safe to use a tenaculum? , 1999, Human reproduction.

[28]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  A Practical Guide to Support Vector Classication , 2008 .

[29]  E G Baxley,et al.  A primary care approach to the infertile couple. , 2001, The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice.

[30]  Mário A. T. Figueiredo,et al.  Efficient feature selection filters for high-dimensional data , 2012, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[31]  P. Pierzyński Oxytocin and vasopressin V(1A) receptors as new therapeutic targets in assisted reproduction. , 2011, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[32]  P. De Sutter,et al.  Assessment of uterine activity during IVF by quantitative ultrasound imaging: a pilot study. , 2020, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[33]  D. Andina,et al.  Feature selection using Sequential Forward Selection and classification applying Artificial Metaplasticity Neural Network , 2010, IECON 2010 - 36th Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics Society.

[34]  Massimo Mischi,et al.  Dedicated Ultrasound Speckle Tracking for Quantitative Analysis of Uterine Motion Outside Pregnancy , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control.

[35]  Huan Liu,et al.  Feature Selection for High-Dimensional Data: A Fast Correlation-Based Filter Solution , 2003, ICML.

[36]  Joarder Kamruzzaman,et al.  A machine learning approach for prediction of pregnancy outcome following IVF treatment , 2018, Neural Computing and Applications.

[37]  G. Saade,et al.  Predicting Term and Preterm Delivery With Transabdominal Uterine Electromyography , 2003, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[38]  Gavin C. Cawley,et al.  On Over-fitting in Model Selection and Subsequent Selection Bias in Performance Evaluation , 2010, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[39]  Y. P. Li,et al.  Uterine peristalsis before embryo transfer affects the chance of clinical pregnancy in fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. , 2014, Human reproduction.

[40]  K. Borgwardt,et al.  Machine Learning in Medicine , 2015, Mach. Learn. under Resour. Constraints Vol. 3.

[41]  W. Kuczyński,et al.  Oxytocin antagonists may improve infertility treatment. , 2007, Fertility and sterility.

[42]  S. Dey,et al.  Mechanisms of implantation: strategies for successful pregnancy , 2012, Nature Medicine.

[43]  Jean Marc Ayoubi,et al.  Uterine dynamics: impact on the human reproduction process. , 2009, Reproductive biomedicine online.

[44]  V. Goossens,et al.  Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2004: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. , 2008, Human reproduction.

[45]  P. Devroey,et al.  The role of the endometrium and embryo in human implantation. , 2007, Human reproduction update.

[46]  P. De Sutter,et al.  Prediction of implantation after blastocyst transfer in in vitro fertilization: a machine-learning perspective. , 2019, Fertility and sterility.

[47]  C. Flamigni,et al.  Uterine contractility during the menstrual cycle. , 2000, Human reproduction.

[48]  A. Bener,et al.  Predictive Modeling of Implantation Outcome in an In Vitro Fertilization Setting , 2015, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[49]  C. Rabotti,et al.  Quantitative Ultrasound Imaging and Characterization of Uterine Peristaltic Waves , 2018, 2018 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS).