Energized geocasting model for underwater wireless sensor networks

Abstract In sensor networks, energy plays a vital role during communication between the sensor nodes. The amount of energy available at a sensor node increases or decreases the life of the network. A group of sensor nodes can share their information, only when they are active and alive that is they have enough energy to communicate. Over the past few years researchers have been involved in conserving energy by designing and proposing techniques that consume less energy. In this paper, we propose an energy efficient geocast technique for underwater sensor networks. This work extends over the RMTG protocol. The ERMTG algorithm takes into account the current energy state of the nodes to select the next relay node. The transmission energy of a node depends on the distance between it and the next hop node to which it wishes to transmit. By preferring paths made of closer nodes, a routing algorithm may reduce the energy consumption, hence increasing a node’s life. The simulation results obtained, show that the proposed ERMTG protocol is able to decrease the energy utilization in the network as compared to the RMTG protocol under similar working environment. The ERMTG protocol is found to outperform the RMTG protocol on various parameters such as network energy, path energy and the number of dead nodes.

[1]  Sunshin An,et al.  Energy-Efficient Routing Protocol in Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks , 2008, 2008 IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing.

[2]  Uday B. Desai,et al.  E-PULRP: Energy Optimized Path Unaware Layered Routing Protocol for Underwater Sensor Networks , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[3]  Mohammad S. Obaidat,et al.  An acoustic communication based AQUA-GLOMO simulator for underwater networks , 2011, Human-centric Computing and Information Sciences.

[4]  T Padmavathy,et al.  ENERGY CONSTRAINED RELIABLE ROUTING OPTIMIZED CLUSTER HEAD PROTOCOL FOR MULTIHOP UNDER WATER ACOUSTIC SENSOR NETWORKS , 2012 .

[5]  I-Fan Chen,et al.  A Clustering Head Selection Algorithm for Underwater Sensor Networks , 2008, 2008 Second International Conference on Future Generation Communication and Networking.

[6]  Milica Stojanovic,et al.  On the relationship between capacity and distance in an underwater acoustic communication channel , 2007, MOCO.

[7]  Mohammad S. Obaidat,et al.  Chapter 13 – Energy-Efficient Sensor Networks , 2013 .

[8]  Feng Yuan,et al.  TLEO: Time Limited Energy Optimal Algorithm for Underwater Acoustic Sensor Networks , 2008, 2008 4th International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing.

[9]  V. Rodoplu,et al.  UWAN-MAC: An Energy-Efficient MAC Protocol for Underwater Acoustic Wireless Sensor Networks , 2007, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[10]  Mohammad S. Obaidat,et al.  Providing reliable and link stability-based geocasting model in underwater environment , 2012, Int. J. Commun. Syst..

[11]  Dong Fang,et al.  A CSMA/CA-Based MAC Protocol for Underwater Acoustic Networks , 2010, 2010 6th International Conference on Wireless Communications Networking and Mobile Computing (WiCOM).

[12]  Michele Zorzi,et al.  Energy-Efficient Routing Schemes for Underwater Acoustic Networks , 2008, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[13]  Nirvana Meratnia,et al.  Underwater Sensor Networks: A New Energy Efficient and Robust Architecture , 2012, Sensors.

[14]  M.C. Domingo,et al.  Design and Analysis of a GPS-free Routing Protocol for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks in Deep Water , 2007, 2007 International Conference on Sensor Technologies and Applications (SENSORCOMM 2007).

[15]  Mari Carmen Domingo,et al.  A Distributed Clustering Scheme for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks , 2007, 2007 IEEE 18th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications.

[16]  Anuj Sehgal,et al.  Energy consumption analysis of underwater acoustic sensor networks , 2011, OCEANS'11 MTS/IEEE KONA.