Constructing Stable Preferences: A Look Into Dimensions of Experience and Their Impact on Preference Stability

There are 2 polar schools of thought regarding the existence of preferences. The economics tradition is based on the assumption of existing preferences. The emerging constructive processing approach assumes preferences are constructed based on the task and context factors present during choice or preference elicitation. Most researchers believe in a middle ground in which consumers construct their preferences when they are new to a category and eventually develop more stable preferences with experience in a domain. This research was designed to bridge the gap between these 2 schools of thought by understanding the process by which preferences are learned and developed over time. Specifically, we investigated the impact of several dimensions of experience (effort, choice, and experience) on preference stability. Results revealed that the type of experience and its corresponding effort had a large impact on the process of preference development. Study 1 demonstrated that by exposing participants to the trade-offs in their environment, their preferences developed and stabilized most rapidly. In addition, the act of making a choice (Study 2) and repeated choices (Study 3) both led to increased preference stability as indicated by measures of objective and subjective preference stability.

[1]  P. Slovic,et al.  Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions. , 1971 .

[2]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Response-induced reversals of preference in gambling: An extended replication in las vegas , 1973 .

[3]  M. Kaplan,et al.  Human judgment and decision processes , 1975 .

[4]  T. R. Stewart,et al.  10 – SOCIAL JUDGMENT THEORY , 1975 .

[5]  N. Pennington,et al.  Human judgment and decision making: Theories, methods, and procedures , 1980 .

[6]  Christopher P. Puto,et al.  Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity & the Similarity Hypothesis. , 1981 .

[7]  Alice M. Tybout,et al.  Availability of well-defined internal knowledge and the attitude formation process: Information aggregation versus self-perception , 1983 .

[8]  Henry Montgomery,et al.  Decision Rules and the Search for a Dominance Structure: Towards a Process Model of Decision Making* , 1983 .

[9]  Jeffrey E. Danes,et al.  Social Judgment Theory , 1984 .

[10]  M. Brucks.  The Effects of Product Class Knowledge on Information Search Behavior , 1985 .

[11]  Stephen J. Hoch,et al.  Consumer Learning: Advertising and the Ambiguity of Product Experience , 1986 .

[12]  J. W. Hutchinson,et al.  Dimensions of Consumer Expertise , 1987 .

[13]  A. Tversky,et al.  Contingent weighting in judgment and choice , 1988 .

[14]  R. Thaler.  Anomalies: The Winner's Curse , 1988 .

[15]  Carol J. Williams,et al.  The Role of Attitude Accessibility in the Attitude-to-Behavior Process , 1989 .

[16]  Stephen J. Hoch,et al.  Managing What Consumers Learn from Experience , 1989 .

[17]  R. Hogarth.  Insights in Decision Making , 1990 .

[18]  A. Tversky,et al.  Compatibility effects in judgment and choice. , 1990 .

[19]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Value elicitation: Is there anything in there? , 1991 .

[20]  Colin F. Camerer,et al.  The rationality of prices and volume in experimental markets , 1992 .

[21]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choice in Context: Tradeoff Contrast and Extremeness Aversion , 1992 .

[22]  G. W. Fischer,et al.  Strategy compatibility, scale compatibility, and the prominence effect. , 1993 .

[23]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  The adaptive decision maker , 1993 .

[24]  L. Beach.  Broadening the Definition of Decision Making: The Role of Prechoice Screening of Options , 1993 .

[25]  Charles R. Plott,et al.  Rational Individual Behavior in Markets and Social Choice Processes: the Discovered Preference Hypothesis , 1993 .

[26]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Stated Willingness to Pay for Public Goods: A Psychological Perspective , 1993 .

[27]  Joseph W. Alba,et al.  The Role of Consumers' Intuitions in Inference Making , 1994 .

[28]  S. Hawkins,et al.  Information Processing Strategies in Riskless Preference Reversals: The Prominence Effect , 1994 .

[29]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Source dependence in the valuation of objects , 1994 .

[30]  J. Payne,et al.  How People Respond to Contingent Valuation Questions: A Verbal Protocol Analysis of Willingness to Pay for an Environmental Regulation , 1994 .

[31]  T. Gilovich,et al.  Heuristics and Biases: When Less Is More: Counterfactual Thinking and Satisfaction among Olympic Medalists , 2002 .

[32]  Dan Ariely,et al.  Seeking Subjective Dominance in Multidimensional Space: An Explanation of the Asymmetric Dominance Effect , 1995 .

[33]  T. Gilovich,et al.  When Less Is More: Counterfactual Thinking and Satisfaction Among Olympic Medalists , 1995 .

[34]  P. M. West.  Predicting Preferences: An Examination of Agent Learning , 1996 .

[35]  Stephen J. Hoch,et al.  Consumption Vocabulary and Preference Formation , 1996 .

[36]  Mark Perlman,et al.  The Rational Foundations of Economic Behaviour , 1996 .

[37]  Deborah Roedder John,et al.  Consumer learning by analogy , 1997 .

[38]  Jonathan Baron,et al.  Regular ArticleProtected Values , 1997 .

[39]  Baron,et al.  Protected Values , 1997, Virology.

[40]  Deborah Roedder John,et al.  Consumer Learning by Analogy: A Model of Internal Knowledge Transfer , 1997 .