Meta-Analyses and Review of Research on Pull-Out Programs in Gifted Education

The purpose of this research was to evaluate the effectiveness of pull-out programs in gifted education. Nine experimental studies were located that dealt with pull-out programs for gifted students. The variables of self-concept, achievement, critical thinking, and creativity were quantified via meta-analysis. The results indicate that pull-out models in gifted education have significant positive effects for the variables of achievement, critical thinking, and creativity. However, gifted students' self-concepts were not affected by the pull-out programs.

[1]  J. Feldhusen Why the Public Schools will Continue to Neglect the Gifted , 1989 .

[2]  C. J. Mills,et al.  A Special Program for Highly Able Rural Youth in Grades Five and Six , 1989 .

[3]  J. W. Asher,et al.  Composition Research: Empirical Designs , 1988 .

[4]  J. Vantassel-Baska The Ineffectiveness of the Pull-Out Program Model in Gifted Education: A Minority Perspective , 1987 .

[5]  J. Renzulli The Positive Side of Pull-Out Programs , 1987 .

[6]  F. Belcastro Elementary pull‐out program for the intellectually gifted‐boon or bane? , 1987 .

[7]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  Effects of Ability Grouping on Student Achievement , 1987 .

[8]  K. Carter A Cognitive Outcomes Study to Evaluate Curriculum for the Gifted , 1986 .

[9]  J. Feldhusen,et al.  Creativity Instructional Materials: A Review of Research , 1986 .

[10]  J. Feldhusen,et al.  Guidelines for grade advancement of precocious children , 1986 .

[11]  Barbara Larose The Lighthouse Program: A Longitudinal Research Project , 1986 .

[12]  W. Asher Conducting Research with Meta-Analysis: A New Direction for Gifted Education , 1986 .

[13]  L. Hedges Chapter 11: Issues in Meta-Analysis , 1986 .

[14]  Larry V. Hedges,et al.  Issues in Meta-Analysis , 1986 .

[15]  K. Carter Evaluating the Consequences of Participating in a Gifted Pullout Program. , 1986 .

[16]  Howard H. Ebmeier,et al.  An Empirical Comparison of Two Program Models for Elementary Gifted Education , 1985 .

[17]  J. Feldhusen,et al.  The Effects of Enrichment on Self-Concept and Creative Thinking , 1984 .

[18]  Laura Hall Rose,et al.  A Meta‐Analysis of Long‐Term Creativity Training Programs , 1984 .

[19]  James A. Kulik,et al.  Synthesis of Research on Effects of Accelerated Instruction. , 1984 .

[20]  Ann Hammond Beckwith Use of the Ross Test as an Assessment Measure in Programs for the Gifted and a Comparison Study of the Ross Test to Individually Administered Intelligence Test , 1983 .

[21]  M. B. Kolloff THE EFFECTS OF AN ENRICHMENT PROGRAM ON THE SELF-CONCEPTS AND CREATIVE THINKING ABILITIES OF GIFTED AND CREATIVE ELEMENTARY STUDENTS , 1983 .

[22]  J. Coleman,et al.  Self-Concept and the Gifted Classroom: The Role of Social Comparisons , 1982 .

[23]  S. Reis,et al.  A Case for a Broadened Conception of Giftedness. , 1982 .

[24]  C. Maddux,et al.  Self-Concept and Social Distance in Gifted Children , 1982 .

[25]  J. Wherry,et al.  Self-Concepts of Gifted Students as Measured by the Piers-Harris Children's Self-Concept Scale , 1981 .

[26]  Me: A Self-Concept Scale for Gifted Students , 1981 .

[27]  J. Feldhusen,et al.  PACE (Program for Academic and Creative Enrichment): An Application of the Purdue Three Stage Model , 1981 .

[28]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  Effects of Ability Grouping on Secondary School Students: A Meta-analysis of Evaluation Findings , 1981 .

[29]  G. Glass,et al.  Meta-analysis in social research , 1981 .

[30]  RICHARD D. Campbell,et al.  Gifted Students: A 15-Year Longitudinal Study , 1980 .

[31]  D. Gingrich Educational Research and Evaluation Methods , 1979 .

[32]  H. Lyon Education of the Gifted and Talented , 1976, Exceptional children.

[33]  L. Bachtold Effects of learning environment on verbal creativity of gifted students , 1974 .

[34]  Ruth A. Martinson,et al.  The Effects of Ability Grouping , 1966 .

[35]  J. Wilson Some Results of an Enrichment Program for Gifted Ninth Graders , 1959 .