Relationships Between Laboratory Measured Characteristics of HMA and Field Compactability (With Discussion)

Field compaction has become a greater challenge since the increased use of polymer modified binders and introduction of Superpave designed mixtures. Compacting difficulty has been cited for many Superpave designed mixes, meaning that to achieve acceptable density levels, a greater compactive effort is required. Laboratory measured mixture parameters have been proposed as HMA compactability indicators by several asphalt researchers. However, actual field studies have not validated most of these measured. In this study, laboratory parameters used as mix compactability measures are compaction slope, locking point, and Bailey Method ratios, number of gyrations to reach 92% of G sub mm (N sub 92), percentage of G sub mm at N sub ini, and Compaction Energy Index, whereas in the field, mix compactability is quantified by the Accumulated Compaction Pressure. Results show that many factors affecting field compaction complicate finding a simple laboratory and field compactability relationship, and thus the relationship between laboratory compactability and field compactability could not be described by a single correlation. However, a relationship was established through multiple regression analysis.

[1]  Brian D Prowell,et al.  NCAT TEST TRACK DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, AND PERFORMANCE , 2002 .

[2]  Richard A. Johnson,et al.  Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1983 .

[3]  Samuel H Carpenter,et al.  Calculating Air Voids at Specified Number of Gyrations in Superpave Gyratory Compactor , 1998 .

[4]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences , 2004, Technometrics.

[5]  Aurilio,et al.  Bailey Method - Achieving Volumetrics and HMA Compactability , 2005 .

[6]  Thomas Harman,et al.  TARGET AND TOLERANCE STUDY FOR THE ANGLE OF GYRATION USED IN THE SUPERPAVE GYRATORY COMPACTOR (SGC) By , 2002 .

[7]  D Decker,et al.  SUPERPAVE CONSTRUCTION ISSUES AND EARLY PERFORMANCE EVALUATION , 1999 .

[8]  Henderikus Lodewikus ter Huerne,et al.  Compaction of asphalt road pavements : using finite elements and critical state theory , 2004 .

[9]  G Huber,et al.  THE BAILEY METHOD OF GRADATION EVALUATION : A TOOL FOR MIX DESIGN AND QUALITY CONTROL , 2004 .

[10]  Hussain U Bahia,et al.  OPTIMIZATION OF CONSTRUCTIBILITY AND RESISTANCE TO TRAFFIC: A NEW DESIGN APPROACH FOR HMA USING THE SUPERPAVE COMPACTOR , 1998 .

[11]  M Acott,et al.  HOT MIX ASPHALT PRODUCTION, PLACEMENT, AND COMPACTION RELATED TO PAVEMENT PERFORMANCE (WITH DISCUSSION) , 1989 .

[12]  Hussain U Bahia,et al.  Evaluation and Selection of Aggregate Gradations for Asphalt Mixtures Using Superpave , 1997 .

[13]  Brian Prowell Verification of the Superpave Gyratory Ndesign Compaction Levels , 2006 .