Exploring the potential impact of serious games on social learning and stakeholder collaborations for transboundary watershed management of the St. Lawrence River Basin

The meaningful participation of stakeholders in decision-making is now widely recognized as a crucial element of effective water resource management, particularly with regards to adapting to climate and environmental change. Social learning is increasingly being cited as an important component of engagement if meaningful participation is to be achieved. The exact definition of social learning is still a matter under debate, but is taken to be a process in which individuals experience a change in understanding that is brought about by social interaction. Social learning has been identified as particularly important in transboundary contexts, where it is necessary to reframe problems from a local to a basin-wide perspective. In this study, social learning is explored in the context of transboundary water resource management in the St. Lawrence River Basin. The overarching goal of this paper is to explore the potential role of serious games to improve social learning in the St. Lawrence River. To achieve this end, a two-pronged approach is followed: (1) Assessing whether social learning is currently occurring and identifying what the barriers to social learning are through interviews with the region's water resource managers; (2) Undertaking a literature review to understand the mechanisms through which serious games enhance social learning to understand which barriers serious games can break down. Interview questions were designed to explore the relevance of social learning in the St. Lawrence River basin context, and to identify the practices currently employed that impact on social learning. While examples of social learning that is occurring have been identified, preliminary results suggest that these examples are exceptions rather than the rule, and that on the whole, social learning is not occurring to its full potential. The literature review of serious games offers an assessment of such collaborative mechanisms in terms of design principles, modes of play, and their potential impact on social learning for transboundary watershed management. Serious game simulations provide new opportunities for multidirectional collaborative processes by bringing diverse stakeholders to the table, providing more equal access to a virtual negotiation or learning space to develop and share knowledge, integrating different knowledge domains, and providing opportunities to test and analyze the outcomes of novel management solutions. This paper concludes with a discussion of how serious games can address specific barriers and weaknesses to social learning in the transboundary watershed context of the St. Lawrence River Basin.

[1]  M. Reed Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review , 2008 .

[2]  Carel Dieperink,et al.  Conceptualising joint knowledge production in regional climate change adaptation projects: success conditions and levers for action , 2012 .

[3]  M. Keen,et al.  Social Learning: A new approach to environmental management , 2005 .

[4]  Jan Adamowski,et al.  Multi-Loop Social Learning for Sustainable Land and Water Governance: Towards a Research Agenda on the Potential of Virtual Learning Platforms , 2014 .

[5]  Jackie Robinson,et al.  Relationships Between Perceived Coastal Waterway Condition and Social Aspects of Quality of Life , 2006 .

[6]  François Bousquet,et al.  Companion Modeling, Conflict Resolution, and Institution Building: Sharing Irrigation Water in the Lingmuteychu Watershed, Bhutan , 2006 .

[7]  M. Schijven,et al.  Systematic review of serious games for medical education and surgical skills training , 2012, The British journal of surgery.

[8]  M. S. Reed,et al.  Five principles for the practice of knowledge exchange in environmental management. , 2014, Journal of environmental management.

[9]  Polly J. Ericksen,et al.  What Is the Vulnerability of a Food System to Global Environmental Change , 2008 .

[10]  S. Arnstein,et al.  Ladder of Citizen Participation , 2020 .

[11]  Igor S. Mayer,et al.  The Gaming of Policy and the Politics of Gaming: A Review , 2009 .

[12]  J. Norberg,et al.  ADAPTIVE GOVERNANCE OF SOCIAL-ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS , 2005 .

[13]  Jannes Slomp,et al.  Why do games work? - In search of the active substance , 2008 .

[14]  B. Crona,et al.  The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference? , 2009 .

[15]  M. Merialdi,et al.  Learning in a Virtual World: Experience With Using Second Life for Medical Education , 2010, Journal of medical Internet research.

[16]  Pieter J. Beers,et al.  Social learning in regional innovation networks: trust, commitment and reframing as emergent properties of interaction , 2013 .

[17]  I. Mayer,et al.  Perspectives on Policy Analysis: A Framework for Understanding and Design , 2004 .

[19]  Karen Bakker,et al.  Eau Canada: The Future of Canada's Water , 2006 .

[20]  R. Freeman Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[21]  M. Scheffer,et al.  Adaptive Management of the Great Barrier Reef and the Grand Canyon World Heritage Areas , 2007, Ambio.

[22]  Andrew C. Inkpen,et al.  Social Capital, Networks, and Knowledge Transfer , 2005 .

[23]  A. Klaphake Kooperation an internationalen Flüssen aus ökonomischer Perspektive: das Konzept des Benefit Sharing , 2005 .

[24]  E. Norman Governing Transboundary Waters: Canada, the United States, and Indigenous Communities , 2014 .

[25]  K Shea,et al.  Management of populations in conservation, harvesting and control. , 1998, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[26]  Klaas Schwartz,et al.  Water management simulation games and the construction of knowledge , 2012 .

[27]  Igor S Mayer,et al.  Collaborative Decisionmaking for Sustainable Urban Renewal Projects: A Simulation – Gaming Approach , 2005 .

[28]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes , 2009 .

[29]  D. Roux,et al.  Bridging the Science-Management Divide: Moving from Unidirectional Knowledge Transfer to Knowledge Interfacing and Sharing , 2006 .

[30]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Social learning: the key to integrated water resources management? , 2008 .

[31]  Christopher J. Orr,et al.  Towards sustainable water governance: Examining water governance issues in Québec through the lens of multi-loop social learning , 2015 .

[32]  Jesper Juul Half-Real: Video Games between Real Rules and Fictional Worlds , 2005 .

[33]  Paul Jeffrey,et al.  Time to Talk? How the Structure of Dialog Processes Shapes Stakeholder Learning in Participatory Water Resources Management , 2012 .

[34]  B. Crona,et al.  Learning in Support of Governance: Theories, Methods, and a Framework to Assess How Bridging Organizations Contribute to Adaptive Resource Governance , 2012 .

[35]  J. Timmerman,et al.  Adaptation to Climate Change: Challenges for Transboundary Water Management , 2011 .

[36]  C. S. Holling Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management , 2005 .

[37]  T. Webler,et al.  Public Participation in Impact Assess-ment: A Social Learning Perspective , 1995 .

[38]  Pascal Perez,et al.  Who wants to terminate the game? The role of vested interests and metaplayers in the ATOLLGAME experience , 2007 .

[39]  Rob Nadolski,et al.  Scripted collaboration in serious gaming for complex learning: Effects of multiple perspectives when acquiring water management skills , 2011, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[40]  Geertje Bekebrede,et al.  The research and evaluation of serious games: Toward a comprehensive methodology , 2014, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[41]  J. Uitto,et al.  Management of transboundary water resources: lessons from international cooperation for conflict prevention , 2002 .

[42]  C. Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on Social Learning in Water Resources Management Social Learning in European River-Basin Management: Barriers and Fostering Mechanisms from 10 River Basins , 2007 .

[43]  A. Wals Reviews , 2007 .

[44]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Insight, part of a Special Feature on Exploring Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems Shooting the Rapids: Navigating Transitions to Adaptive Governance of Social-Ecological Systems , 2006 .

[45]  Gerard P. Learmonth,et al.  A practical approach to the complex problem of environmental sustainability: The UVa Bay Game , 2011 .

[46]  G. Cundill,et al.  Learning in Adaptive Management: Insights from Published Practice , 2014 .

[47]  S.C.L. Prins,et al.  Boundary Dynamics in Natural Resource Management: The Ambiguity of Stakeholder Inclusion , 2017 .

[48]  K. Bakker,et al.  Water Governance in Canada: Innovation and Fragmentation , 2011 .

[49]  A. Hendriks,et al.  Games to Create Awareness and Design Policies for Transboundary Cooperation in River Basins: Lessons from the Shariva Game of the Mekong River Commission , 2014, Water Resources Management.

[50]  Jos G. Timmerman,et al.  Research, part of a Special Feature on New Methods for Adaptive Water Management Assessing Management Regimes in Transboundary River Basins: Do They Support Adaptive Management? , 2008 .

[51]  Igor S. Mayer,et al.  Games in a World of Infrastructures , 2003 .

[52]  Daniel J. Decker,et al.  Public Participation in Wildlife Management: What Do Stakeholders Want? , 2004 .

[53]  Julia C. Lo,et al.  Integrated , Ecosystem-based Marine Spatial Planning: First Results from International Simulation-Ga , 2012 .

[54]  T. Bruce Lauber,et al.  Citizen Participation in Natural Resource Management: A Synthesis of HDRU Research , 2000 .

[55]  Claudia Pahl-Wostl,et al.  Adaptive Water Governance: Assessing the Institutional Prescriptions of Adaptive (Co-)Management from a Governance Perspective and Defining a Research Agenda , 2009 .

[56]  P. Vermeulen,et al.  Policy gaming for strategy and change , 2007 .

[57]  A. Maas Water, Governance and Sustainability: A Case Study of Water Allocation in Whiteman's Creek, Ontario , 2011 .

[58]  Colin Robson,et al.  Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-Researchers , 1993 .

[59]  Ivo Wenzler,et al.  Learning through games? Evaluating the learning effect of a policy exercise on European climate policy , 2011 .

[60]  Linda Argote,et al.  Managing Knowledge in Organizations: An Integrative Framework and Review of Emerging Themes , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[61]  Jan Seibert,et al.  Irrigania - a web-based game about sharing water resources , 2012 .

[62]  Christophe Le Page,et al.  Co-constructing with stakeholders a role-playing game to initiate collective management of erosive runoff risks at the watershed scale , 2010, Environ. Model. Softw..

[63]  C. Sadoff,et al.  Beyond the river: the benefits of cooperation on international rivers. , 2003, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[64]  Maria E. Fernandez-Gimenez,et al.  Adaptive Management and Social Learning in Collaborative and Community-Based Monitoring: a Study of Five Community-Based Forestry Organizations in the western USA , 2008 .

[65]  Tharsi Taillieu,et al.  Multi‐party collaboration as social learning for interdependence: developing relational knowing for sustainable natural resource management , 2004 .

[66]  Qiqi Zhou The Princess in the Castle: Challenging Serious Game Play for Integrated Policy Analysis and Planning , 2014 .

[67]  Jurian Edelenbos,et al.  Co-producing knowledge: joint knowledge production between experts, bureaucrats and stakeholders in Dutch water management projects , 2011 .

[68]  Arjen Ysbert Hoekstra,et al.  Computer-supported games and role plays in teaching water management , 2012 .

[69]  D. Decker,et al.  Social Learning for Collaborative Natural Resource Management , 2003 .

[70]  Robert Dyball,et al.  Learning based change for sustainability: perspectives and pathways , 2007 .

[71]  W. Medema Integrated Water Resources Management and Adaptive Management: Shaping Science and Practice , 2008 .

[72]  R. Kasperson,et al.  Barriers in the science-policy-practice interface: Toward a knowledge-action-system in global environmental change research , 2010 .

[73]  K. Bakker,et al.  Transgressing Scales: Water Governance Across the Canada–U.S. Borderland , 2009 .

[74]  Bradley D. Parrish,et al.  What is social learning , 2010 .

[75]  C. Prell,et al.  Unpacking “Participation” in the Adaptive Management of Social–ecological Systems: a Critical Review , 2006 .

[76]  Geertje Bekebrede,et al.  Understanding complex adaptive systems by playing games , 2010, Informatics Educ..

[77]  Klaus Eisenack,et al.  Climate Change Gaming on Board and Screen , 2013 .

[78]  M. Lamers,et al.  Beyond dry feet? Experiences from a participatory water-management planning case in The Netherlands. , 2010 .