Hypotensive patients with blunt abdominal trauma: performance of screening US.

PURPOSE To determine retrospectively the accuracy of screening ultrasonography (US) in patients with hypotension (systolic blood pressure <or= 90 mm Hg) after blunt abdominal trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS The investigational review board approved the study and waived informed consent. The study group consisted of 128 hypotensive patients with blunt abdominal trauma who underwent screening US over a 9-year period. Abdomens were scanned for free fluid and for parenchymal heterogeneity in visceral organs; scans that depicted these were considered positive. Prospective reports were used to calculate diagnostic performance. Patients were retrospectively given a fluid score according to the number of fluid pockets visualized (0, 1, or > or =2) (consensus by three readers) and were assigned to a low- or high-risk group according to the presence of hematuria and/or axial fracture on radiographs. Screening US results were compared with findings with the best available reference standard (computed tomography [CT]), repeat US, other diagnostic test, laparotomy, autopsy, clinical course). Data were compared by using chi(2) or Fisher exact test, depending on expected frequencies, with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Continuous variables were compared by using unpaired Student t test or Mann-Whitney U test, depending on data distribution. RESULTS The study included 77 male and 51 female patients (mean age, 42 years). Sensitivity was 85% (44 of 52) for detection of any injuries, 97% (30 of 31) for surgical injuries (ie, injuries requiring surgery), and 100% (10 of 10) for fatal injuries. Specificity was 96% (73 of 76), 82% (80 of 97), and 69% (81 of 118), and accuracy was 91% (117 of 128), 86% (110 of 128), and 71% (91 of 128), for respective injury categories. One nonfatal surgical injury was missed in a high-risk patient. For each injury category, frequency of injury in patients with a fluid score of 2 or more was nine times that in patients with a score of 0 (P < .001 for all comparisons). Frequency of false-negative US findings in high-risk patients was eight times that in low-risk patients (P < .01). CONCLUSION In patients who are hypotensive after blunt abdominal trauma and not hemodynamically stable enough to undergo diagnostic CT, negative US findings virtually exclude surgical injury, while positive US findings indicate surgical injury in 64% of cases.

[1]  M. Rothmund,et al.  Sonography versus peritoneal lavage in blunt abdominal trauma. , 1989, The Journal of trauma.

[2]  H. Champion,et al.  The Major Trauma Outcome Study: establishing national norms for trauma care. , 1990, The Journal of trauma.

[3]  G. Regel,et al.  Blunt abdominal trauma in cases of multiple trauma evaluated by ultrasonography: a prospective analysis of 291 patients. , 1992, The Journal of trauma.

[4]  H. Karamanoukian,et al.  Emergency department ultrasound in the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma. , 1993, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[5]  D. Candinas,et al.  Ultrasound in blunt abdominal and thoracic trauma. , 1993, The Journal of trauma.

[6]  D. Nunez,et al.  Can ultrasound replace diagnostic peritoneal lavage in the assessment of blunt trauma? , 1994, The Journal of trauma.

[7]  T. P. Davis,et al.  A prospective study of surgeon-performed ultrasound as the primary adjuvant modality for injured patient assessment. , 1995, The Journal of trauma.

[8]  G. Casola,et al.  A prospective evaluation of abdominal ultrasound in blunt trauma: is it useful? , 1996, The Journal of trauma.

[9]  D. Nunez,et al.  1,000 consecutive ultrasounds for blunt abdominal trauma. , 1996, The Journal of trauma.

[10]  J. McGahan,et al.  Use of ultrasonography in the patient with acute abdominal trauma. , 1997, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[11]  Perry Mj,et al.  Limitations of ultrasound evaluation in acute closed renal trauma , 1997 .

[12]  W. Chiu,et al.  Abdominal injuries without hemoperitoneum: a potential limitation of focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) , 1997, The Journal of trauma.

[13]  N. Aikawa,et al.  Usefulness and limitations of ultrasonography in the initial evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma. , 1997 .

[14]  D. Nunez,et al.  Sonography as the primary screening technique for blunt abdominal trauma: experience with 899 patients. , 1998, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[15]  N. Maklad,et al.  Free echogenic pelvic fluid: correlation with hemoperitoneum. , 1998, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[16]  E. Gallagher,et al.  Clinical utility of likelihood ratios. , 1998, Annals of emergency medicine.

[17]  G. Rozycki,et al.  Surgeon-performed ultrasound for the assessment of truncal injuries: lessons learned from 1540 patients. , 1998, Annals of surgery.

[18]  B. Hekimoğlu,et al.  Intraaortic growth of hydatid cysts causing occlusion of the aorta and of both iliac arteries: case report. , 1999, Radiology.

[19]  A. V. van Vugt,et al.  Sonography in a clinical algorithm for early evaluation of 1671 patients with blunt abdominal trauma. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  J. McGahan,et al.  Blunt abdominal trauma: the role of emergent sonography and a review of the literature. , 1999, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  K. McKenney Ultrasound of blunt abdominal trauma. , 1998, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[22]  W. Chiu,et al.  Hemoperitoneum as the sole indicator of abdominal visceral injuries: a potential limitation of screening abdominal US for trauma. , 1999, Radiology.

[23]  K. Nagy,et al.  Experience with over 2500 diagnostic peritoneal lavages. , 2000, Injury.

[24]  G. Casola,et al.  Importance of evaluating organ parenchyma during screening abdominal ultrasonography after blunt trauma. , 2001, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[25]  G. Casola,et al.  Blunt abdominal trauma: screening us in 2,693 patients. , 2001, Radiology.

[26]  G. Casola,et al.  Us of blunt abdominal trauma: importance of free pelvic fluid in women of reproductive age. , 2001, Radiology.

[27]  G. Casola,et al.  Quantification of fluid on screening ultrasonography for blunt abdominal trauma: a simple scoring system to predict severity of injury. , 2001, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[28]  J. McGahan,et al.  Sonographic assessment of blunt abdominal trauma: A 4‐year prospective study , 2002, Journal of clinical ultrasound : JCU.

[29]  G. Casola,et al.  Screening US for blunt abdominal trauma: objective predictors of false-negative findings and missed injuries. , 2003, Radiology.

[30]  G. Casola,et al.  Blunt abdominal trauma: clinical value of negative screening US scans. , 2004, Radiology.