Morphological convexity measures for terrestrial basins derived from digital elevation models

Abstract Geophysical basins of terrestrial surfaces have been quantitatively characterized through a host of indices such as topological quantities (e.g. channel bifurcation and length ratios), allometric scaling exponents (e.g. fractal dimensions), and other geomorphometric parameters (channel density, Hack's and Hurst exponents). Channel density, estimated by taking the ratio between the length of channel network ( L ) and the area of basin ( A ) in planar form, provides a quantitative index that has hitherto been related to various geomorphologically significant processes. This index, computed by taking the planar forms of channel network and its corresponding basin, is a kind of convexity measure in the two-dimensional case. Such a measure – estimated in general as a function of basin area and channel network length, where the important elevation values of the topological region within a basin and channel network are ignored – fails to capture the spatial variability between homotopic basins possessing different altitude-ranges. Two types of convexity measures that have potential to capture the terrain elevation variability are defined as the ratio of (i) length of channel network function and area of basin function and (ii) areas of basin and its convex hull functions. These two convexity measures are estimated in three data sets that include (a) synthetic basin functions, (b) fractal basin functions, and (c) realistic digital elevation models (DEMs) of two regions of peninsular Malaysia. It is proven that the proposed convexity measures are altitude-dependent and that they could capture the spatial variability across the homotopic basins of different altitudes. It is also demonstrated on terrestrial DEMs that these convexity measures possess relationships with other quantitative indexes such as fractal dimensions and complexity measures (roughness indexes).

[1]  B. S. Daya Sagar,et al.  Granulometric analyses of basin‐wise DEMs: a comparative study , 2007 .

[2]  B. S. Daya Sagar,et al.  Morphological operators to extract channel networks from digital elevation models , 2000 .

[3]  J. Brickmann.  B. Mandelbrot: The Fractal Geometry of Nature, Freeman and Co., San Francisco 1982. 460 Seiten, Preis: £ 22,75. , 1985 .

[4]  B. S. Daya Sagar,et al.  Cloud field segmentation via multiscale convexity analysis , 2008 .

[5]  Andrea Rinaldo,et al.  On the drainage density of tidal networks , 2001 .

[6]  Mike Kirkby,et al.  Process models and theoretical geomorphology , 1994 .

[7]  K. Beven,et al.  Channel network hydrology , 1993 .

[8]  Tay Lea Tien,et al.  Allometric power‐law relationships in a Hortonian fractal digital elevation model , 2004 .

[9]  John B. Lindsay,et al.  The Terrain Analysis System: a tool for hydro‐geomorphic applications , 2005 .

[10]  Gregory E. Tucker,et al.  Hillslope processes, drainage density, and landscape morphology , 1998 .

[11]  David G. Tarboton,et al.  On the extraction of channel networks from digital elevation data , 1991 .

[12]  D. Tarboton.  A new method for the determination of flow directions and upslope areas in grid digital elevation models , 1997 .

[13]  L. E. Band,et al.  Extraction of channel networks and topographic parameters from digital elevation data , 1993 .

[14]  Benoit B. Mandelbrot,et al.  Fractal Geometry of Nature , 1984 .

[15]  D. Montgomery,et al.  Source areas, drainage density, and channel initiation , 1989 .

[16]  Donald Robert Coates,et al.  Thresholds in Geomorphology , 2020 .

[17]  Pierre Soille,et al.  Grey scale convex hulls: definition, implementation and application , 1998 .

[18]  S. K. Jenson,et al.  Extracting topographic structure from digital elevation data for geographic information-system analysis , 1988 .

[19]  Filippo Catani,et al.  Statistical analysis of drainage density from digital terrain data , 2001 .

[20]  B. S. Daya Sagar,et al.  Morphometry of network and nonnetwork space of basins , 2005 .

[21]  Jean Serra,et al.  Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology , 1983 .

[22]  Stanley A. Schumm,et al.  Experimental fluvial geomorphology , 1987 .

[23]  A. N. Strahler.  Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basin and channel networks , 1964 .

[24]  R. Horton.  EROSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF STREAMS AND THEIR DRAINAGE BASINS; HYDROPHYSICAL APPROACH TO QUANTITATIVE MORPHOLOGY , 1945 .

[25]  Alan D. Howard,et al.  BADLAND MORPHOLOGY AND EVOLUTION: INTERPRETATION USING A SIMULATION MODEL , 1997 .

[26]  David G. Tarboton,et al.  A Physical Basis for Drainage Density , 1992 .

[27]  Petros Maragos,et al.  Pattern Spectrum and Multiscale Shape Representation , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[28]  B. S. Daya Sagar,et al.  FRACTAL-SKELETAL BASED CHANNEL NETWORK (F-SCN) IN A TRIANGULAR INITIATOR-BASIN , 2001 .

[29]  R. David,et al.  Landscape dissection and drainage area-slope thresholds , 1994 .

[30]  D. Tarboton,et al.  Advances in the mapping of flow networks from digital elevation data , 2001 .

[31]  John F. O'Callaghan,et al.  The extraction of drainage networks from digital elevation data , 1984, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..