Reading Fictional Stories and Winning Delayed Prizes: The Surprising Emotional Impact of Distant Events

Hedonic experiences that involve real, immediate events (such as reading about a recent, real-life tragic event) naturally evoke strong affective reactions. When these events are instead fictional or removed in time, they should be perceived as more psychologically distant and evoke weaker affective reactions. The current research shows that, while consumers' intuitions are in line with this prediction, their actual emotional experiences are surprisingly insensitive to the distancing information. For instance, readers of a sad story overestimated how much their emotional reaction would be reduced by knowing that it described a fictional event. Similarly, game participants overestimated how much their excitement about winning a prize would be dampened by knowing that the prize would only be available later. We propose that actual readers and prize winners were too absorbed by the hedonic experience to incorporate the distancing information, resulting in surprisingly strong affective reactions to fictional stories and delayed prizes.

[1]  J. Ebert,et al.  The role of cognitive resources in the valuation of near and far future events. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[2]  Joel B. Cohen,et al.  On the Consumption of Negative Feelings , 2007 .

[3]  Jelle Jolles,et al.  The Stroop Color-Word Test , 2006, Assessment.

[4]  B. Mellers,et al.  Anticipated Emotions as Guides to Choice , 2001 .

[5]  Daniel M. Oppenheimer,et al.  Instructional Manipulation Checks: Detecting Satisficing to Increase Statistical Power , 2009 .

[6]  D. Gilbert,et al.  Focalism: a source of durability bias in affective forecasting. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[7]  Leaf Van Boven,et al.  Immediacy bias in emotion perception: current emotions seem more intense than previous emotions. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[8]  G. Loewenstein,et al.  Exploring the Cold-to-Hot Empathy Gap in Smokers , 2008, Psychological science.

[9]  R. Buehler,et al.  Intensity Bias in Affective Forecasting: The Role of Temporal Focus , 2001 .

[10]  Patrick S. Malone,et al.  You can't not believe everything you read. , 1993 .

[11]  O. Bratfisch,et al.  Subjective distance and emotional involvement. A psychological mechanism. , 1965, Acta psychologica.

[12]  Carey K. Morewedge,et al.  More intense experiences, less intense forecasts: why people overweight probability specifications in affective forecasts. , 2014, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  G. Loewenstein Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior , 1996 .

[14]  U. Lundberg,et al.  Emotional reaction to past and future events as a function of temporal distance. , 1971, Acta psychologica.

[15]  R. Larsen,et al.  Personality and susceptibility to positive and negative emotional states. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  Joel Huber,et al.  The Impact of Anticipating Satisfaction on Consumer Choice , 2000 .

[17]  T. Newcomb The acquaintance process , 1961 .

[18]  N. Epley,et al.  Perspective taking as egocentric anchoring and adjustment. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Immune neglect: a source of durability bias in affective forecasting. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  Timothy C. Brock,et al.  The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[21]  Kathleen D. Vohs,et al.  Out of Control , 2015 .

[22]  A. Jensen,et al.  The Stroop color-word test: a review. , 1966, Acta psychologica.

[23]  A Peter McGraw,et al.  Feeling close: emotional intensity reduces perceived psychological distance. , 2010, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Predicting a changing taste: Do people know what they will like? , 1992 .

[25]  B. Latané The psychology of social impact. , 1981 .

[26]  Eunkook M. Suh,et al.  Events and subjective well-being: Only recent events matter. , 1996 .

[27]  Jennifer J. Argo,et al.  Fact or Fiction: An Investigation of Empathy Differences in Response to Emotional Melodramatic Entertainment , 2008 .

[28]  Michel Tuan Pham Representativeness, Relevance, and the Use of Feelings in Decision Making , 1998 .

[29]  D. Derryberry Attentional consequences of outcome-related motivational states: Congruent, incongruent, and focusing effects , 1993 .

[30]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Prospection: Experiencing the Future , 2007, Science.

[31]  Nathan Novemsky,et al.  The Time Course and Impact of Consumers' Erroneous Beliefs about Hedonic Contrast Effects , 2003 .

[32]  Tobias Richter,et al.  You don't have to believe everything you read: background knowledge permits fast and efficient validation of information. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  Interrupted Consumption: Disrupting Adaptation to Hedonic Experiences , 2008 .

[34]  D. Gilbert,et al.  Decisions and revisions: the affective forecasting of changeable outcomes. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  L. Bartoshuk The Measurement of Pleasure and Pain , 2014, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

[36]  T. Meyvis,et al.  Why Don't We Learn to Accurately Forecast Feelings? How Misremembering Our Predictions Blinds Us to Past Forecasting Errors , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[37]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  The trouble with Vronsky: Impact bias in the forecasting of future affective states. , 2002 .

[38]  Carey K. Morewedge,et al.  Consuming experience: Why affective forecasters overestimate comparative value , 2010 .

[39]  A. Anderson Affective influences on the attentional dynamics supporting awareness. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.