Temporal Contiguity Training Influences Behavioral and Neural Measures of Viewpoint Tolerance.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Stefan R Schweinberger,et al. Dominance of texture over shape in facial identity processing is modulated by individual abilities , 2017, British journal of psychology.
[2] H. Bülthoff,et al. A shape-based account for holistic face processing. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[3] J. S. Guntupalli,et al. Disentangling the Representation of Identity from Head View Along the Human Face Processing Pathway , 2016, bioRxiv.
[4] Johan Wagemans,et al. How learning might strengthen existing visual object representations in human object-selective cortex , 2016, NeuroImage.
[5] Edward A. Wasserman,et al. Promoting rotational-invariance in object recognition despite experience with only a single view , 2016, Behavioural Processes.
[6] Galit Yovel,et al. A Revised Neural Framework for Face Processing. , 2015, Annual review of vision science.
[7] Kalanit Grill-Spector,et al. Spatiotemporal information during unsupervised learning enhances viewpoint invariant object recognition. , 2015, Journal of vision.
[8] Keiji Tanaka,et al. Neural Substrates of View-Invariant Object Recognition Developed without Experiencing Rotations of the Objects , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[9] Bozana Meinhardt-Injac,et al. Holistic Face Processing is Induced by Shape and Texture , 2013, Perception.
[10] H. P. Op de Beeck,et al. Representations of Facial Identity Information in the Ventral Visual Stream Investigated with Multivoxel Pattern Analyses , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[11] Jonathan R. Folstein,et al. Category learning increases discriminability of relevant object dimensions in visual cortex. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.
[12] Jonathan R. Folstein,et al. How category learning affects object representations: not all morphspaces stretch alike. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[13] J. DiCarlo,et al. Neuronal Learning of Invariant Object Representation in the Ventral Visual Stream Is Not Dependent on Reward , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[14] Nancy Kanwisher,et al. An algorithmic method for functionally defining regions of interest in the ventral visual pathway , 2012, NeuroImage.
[15] Daniel D. Dilks,et al. Mirror-Image Sensitivity and Invariance in Object and Scene Processing Pathways , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[16] Marlene Behrmann,et al. Unraveling the distributed neural code of facial identity through spatiotemporal pattern analysis , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[17] I. Biederman,et al. Loci of the release from fMRI adaptation for changes in facial expression, identity, and viewpoint. , 2010, Journal of vision.
[18] J. DiCarlo,et al. Unsupervised Natural Visual Experience Rapidly Reshapes Size-Invariant Object Representation in Inferior Temporal Cortex , 2010, Neuron.
[19] Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al. Face-identity change activation outside the face system: "release from adaptation" may not always indicate neuronal selectivity. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.
[20] Keiji Tanaka,et al. View‐invariant object recognition ability develops after discrimination, not mere exposure, at several viewing angles , 2010, The European journal of neuroscience.
[21] Jiye G. Kim,et al. Adaptation in the fusiform face area (FFA): Image or person? , 2009, Vision Research.
[22] Bruno Rossion,et al. Recognizing an individual face: 3D shape contributes earlier than 2D surface reflectance information , 2009, NeuroImage.
[23] G. Pourtois,et al. Object representations for multiple visual categories overlap in lateral occipital and medial fusiform cortex. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.
[24] Guy Wallis,et al. Learning Illumination-and Orientation-invariant Representations of Objects through Temporal Association General Methods Experiment Ii , 2022 .
[25] Johan Wagemans,et al. Subordinate Categorization Enhances the Neural Selectivity in Human Object-selective Cortex for Fine Shape Differences , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[26] A. Kleinschmidt,et al. Graded size sensitivity of object-exemplar-evoked activity patterns within human LOC subregions. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.
[27] James J. DiCarlo,et al. Unsupervised Natural Experience Rapidly Alters Invariant Object Representation in Visual Cortex , 2008, Science.
[28] Johan Wagemans,et al. The representation of subordinate shape similarity in human occipitotemporal cortex. , 2008, Journal of vision.
[29] Timothy J. Andrews,et al. Differential sensitivity for viewpoint between familiar and unfamiliar faces in human visual cortex , 2008, NeuroImage.
[30] Raymond J. Dolan,et al. fMRI Activity Patterns in Human LOC Carry Information about Object Exemplars within Category , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[31] R. Goebel,et al. Individual faces elicit distinct response patterns in human anterior temporal cortex , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[32] F. Fang,et al. Duration-dependent FMRI adaptation and distributed viewer-centered face representation in human visual cortex. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.
[33] M. Riesenhuber,et al. Categorization Training Results in Shape- and Category-Selective Human Neural Plasticity , 2007, Neuron.
[34] K. Nakayama,et al. The Cambridge Face Memory Test: Results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants , 2006, Neuropsychologia.
[35] Sean M. Polyn,et al. Beyond mind-reading: multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[36] A. O'Toole,et al. Probing the Visual Representation of Faces With Adaptation , 2006, Psychological science.
[37] G. Boynton,et al. Adaptation: from single cells to BOLD signals , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.
[38] M. Riesenhuber,et al. Evaluation of a Shape-Based Model of Human Face Discrimination Using fMRI and Behavioral Techniques , 2006, Neuron.
[39] K. Grill-Spector,et al. Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[40] E. Miller,et al. Experience-dependent sharpening of visual shape selectivity in inferior temporal cortex. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.
[41] Keiji Tanaka,et al. Prior experience of rotation is not required for recognizing objects seen from different angles , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.
[42] David D. Cox,et al. 'Breaking' position-invariant object recognition , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.
[43] Raymond J. Dolan,et al. Familiarity enhances invariance of face representations in human ventral visual cortex: fMRI evidence , 2005, NeuroImage.
[44] Gilles Pourtois,et al. Portraits or People? Distinct Representations of Face Identity in the Human Visual Cortex , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[45] Gilles Pourtois,et al. View-independent coding of face identity in frontal and temporal cortices is modulated by familiarity: an event-related fMRI study , 2005, NeuroImage.
[46] Timothy J. Andrews,et al. Distinct representations for facial identity and changeable aspects of faces in the human temporal lobe , 2004, NeuroImage.
[47] R. Dolan,et al. fMRI-adaptation reveals dissociable neural representations of identity and expression in face perception. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.
[48] M. Chee,et al. Stimulus repetition and hemodynamic response refractoriness in event‐related fMRI , 2003, Human brain mapping.
[49] M. Behrmann,et al. Impact of learning on representation of parts and wholes in monkey inferotemporal cortex , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.
[50] Z Kourtzi,et al. Representation of Perceived Object Shape by the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 2001, Science.
[51] H. Bülthoff,et al. Effects of temporal association on recognition memory , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[52] K. Grill-Spector,et al. fMR-adaptation: a tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons. , 2001, Acta psychologica.
[53] N. Kanwisher,et al. Cortical Regions Involved in Perceiving Object Shape , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[54] Nancy Kanwisher,et al. fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection , 1999, Nature.
[55] Thomas Vetter,et al. Three-dimensional shape and two-dimensional surface reflectance contributions to face recognition: an application of three-dimensional morphing , 1999, Vision Research.
[56] Keiji Tanaka,et al. Effects of shape-discrimination training on the selectivity of inferotemporal cells in adult monkeys. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.
[57] N. Kanwisher,et al. Covert visual attention modulates face-specific activity in the human fusiform gyrus: fMRI study. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.
[58] Robert L. Goldstone. Influences of categorization on perceptual discrimination. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[59] E T Rolls,et al. Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying face processing within and beyond the temporal cortical visual areas. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.
[60] Peter Földiák,et al. Learning Invariance from Transformation Sequences , 1991, Neural Comput..
[61] A. Mizuno,et al. A change of the leading player in flow Visualization technique , 2006, J. Vis..
[62] K. Fujii,et al. Visualization for the analysis of fluid motion , 2005, J. Vis..
[63] E. Wojciulik,et al. Attention increases neural selectivity in the human lateral occipital complex , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.
[64] D H Brainard,et al. The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.