A 3D biomimetic model of tissue stiffness interface for cancer drug testing.

Contrary to oversimplified preclinical drug screens that derive treatment responses of cancer cells grown on plastic cell culturing surfaces, the actual in vivo scenario for cancer cell invasion is confronted with a diversity of tissue stiffness. After all, the packing of organs and tissues in the body translates to the abundant presence of tissue stiffness interfaces. The invasive dissemination of cancer cells in vivo might be encouraged by favorable tissue stiffness gradients, likely explaining the preferential spread of cancer cells which is subjective to the cancer type and origin of the primary site. Yet these critical tumor microenvironmental influences cannot be recapitulated in 2D preclinical drug screens, hence omitting potentially invaluable in vivo patterns of drug responses that may support safer clinical dosage implementation of cancer drugs. Current attempts to study stiffness implications on cancer cells are largely confined to 2D surfaces of tunable stiffness. While these studies collectively show that cancer cells migrate better on a stiffer matrix, the generation of a biomimetic 3D tissue stiffness interface for cancer cell migration would clearly give a more definitive understanding on the probable push and pull influences of the 3D ECM. Herein, we developed a biomimetic platform which enables the precise placement of spheroids at tissue stiffness interfaces constructed with natural ECM collagen type I. This enables a standardized comparison of spheroid invasion under a 3D stiffness gradient influence. We found that cancer cells in 3D infiltrated more extensively into a softer matrix of 300 Pa while showing significantly reduced invasion into stiffer matrix of 1200 and 6000 Pa. These biomimetic spheroid cultures postinvasion were suitably subjected to paclitaxel treatment and subsequent daily live quantification of apoptotic cells to evaluate the implications of tissue stiffness on chemotherapeutic treatment. We importantly found that cancer cells which more extensively infiltrated the 300 Pa matrix also succumbed to paclitaxel induced apoptosis earlier than cells in stiffer matrices of 1200 and 6000 Pa respectively. This suggests that reduced invasion of cancer cells attributed to increased tissue stiffness barriers may favor their reduced apoptotic susceptibility to chemotherapeutic treatment.

[1]  M. Kuo,et al.  Cell cycle G2/M arrest and activation of cyclin-dependent kinases associated with low-dose paclitaxel-induced sub-G1 apoptosis , 2004, Apoptosis.

[2]  C. Lim,et al.  Thickness sensing of hMSCs on collagen gel directs stem cell fate. , 2010, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[3]  Richard Superfine,et al.  Mechanical stiffness grades metastatic potential in patient tumor cells and in cancer cell lines. , 2011, Cancer research.

[4]  Thomas R. Cox,et al.  Remodeling and homeostasis of the extracellular matrix: implications for fibrotic diseases and cancer , 2011, Disease Models & Mechanisms.

[5]  D. Radisky,et al.  Fibrosis and cancer: Do myofibroblasts come also from epithelial cells via EMT? , 2007, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[6]  C. Rueden,et al.  Bmc Medicine Collagen Density Promotes Mammary Tumor Initiation and Progression , 2022 .

[7]  Sanjay Kumar,et al.  The mechanical rigidity of the extracellular matrix regulates the structure, motility, and proliferation of glioma cells. , 2009, Cancer research.

[8]  R. Ehman,et al.  Liver stiffness is associated with risk of decompensation, liver cancer, and death in patients with chronic liver diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2013, Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association.

[9]  Daniel Gioeli,et al.  Matrix Rigidity Regulates Cancer Cell Growth and Cellular Phenotype , 2010, PloS one.

[10]  S. Eccles,et al.  Tumor spheroid-based migration assays for evaluation of therapeutic agents. , 2013, Methods in molecular biology.

[11]  S. Hajdu,et al.  A note from history: Landmarks in history of cancer, Part 6 , 2013, Cancer.

[12]  Jayanta Debnath,et al.  Modelling glandular epithelial cancers in three-dimensional cultures , 2005, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[13]  Marilena Loizidou,et al.  3D tumour models: novel in vitro approaches to cancer studies , 2011, Journal of Cell Communication and Signaling.

[14]  A. Kallioniemi,et al.  BMP4 inhibits the proliferation of breast cancer cells and induces an MMP-dependent migratory phenotype in MDA-MB-231 cells in 3D environment , 2013, BMC Cancer.

[15]  M. Pike,et al.  Mammographic density, MRI background parenchymal enhancement and breast cancer risk. , 2013, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[16]  Peter H Watson,et al.  Mammographic density is related to stroma and stromal proteoglycan expression , 2003, Breast Cancer Research.

[17]  F. Wen,et al.  A Bio‐inspired Platform to Modulate Myogenic Differentiation of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Through Focal Adhesion Regulation , 2013, Advanced healthcare materials.

[18]  O. Nanni,et al.  Cell proliferation as a predictor of response to chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer: A prospective study , 1997, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[19]  Fei Liu,et al.  A Multiwell Platform for Studying Stiffness-Dependent Cell Biology , 2011, PloS one.

[20]  Li V. Yang,et al.  In vitro cell migration and invasion assays. , 2014, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[21]  L. Kunz-Schughart,et al.  Multicellular tumor spheroids: an underestimated tool is catching up again. , 2010, Journal of biotechnology.

[22]  R. Shoemaker The NCI60 human tumour cell line anticancer drug screen , 2006, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[23]  D A Weitz,et al.  Glioma expansion in collagen I matrices: analyzing collagen concentration-dependent growth and motility patterns. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[24]  William R. Sellers,et al.  Advances in the preclinical testing of cancer therapeutic hypotheses , 2011, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[25]  V. Virador,et al.  In vitro three‐dimensional (3D) models in cancer research: An update , 2013, Molecular carcinogenesis.

[26]  M. Knight,et al.  Cell mechanics, structure, and function are regulated by the stiffness of the three-dimensional microenvironment. , 2012, Biophysical journal.

[27]  Timothy J. Mitchison,et al.  The proliferation rate paradox in antimitotic chemotherapy , 2012, Molecular biology of the cell.

[28]  L. P. Tan,et al.  Bio-inspired micropatterned platform to steer stem cell differentiation. , 2011, Small.

[29]  David B. Holiday,et al.  Taxol-induced cell cycle arrest and apoptosis: dose-response relationship in lung cancer cells of different wild-type p53 status and under isogenic condition. , 2001, Cancer letters.

[30]  S. Sen,et al.  Matrix Elasticity Directs Stem Cell Lineage Specification , 2006, Cell.

[31]  Steven I Hajdu,et al.  A note from history: Landmarks in history of cancer, part 2 , 2011, Cancer.

[32]  Helen Ladd Library Part 6 , 2001, Dimensions of Mystical Experiences.

[33]  C. V. van Blitterswijk,et al.  Spheroid culture as a tool for creating 3D complex tissues. , 2013, Trends in biotechnology.

[34]  C. Koh,et al.  Mitosis-targeted anti-cancer therapies: where they stand , 2012, Cell Death and Disease.

[35]  Mina J Bissell,et al.  Modeling tissue-specific signaling and organ function in three dimensions , 2003, Journal of Cell Science.

[36]  A. Rosenwald,et al.  Cancers as wounds that do not heal: differences and similarities between renal regeneration/repair and renal cell carcinoma. , 2006, Cancer research.

[37]  L. O’Driscoll,et al.  Three-dimensional cell culture: the missing link in drug discovery. , 2013, Drug discovery today.

[38]  Adam J. Engler,et al.  Matrix elasticity directs stem cell differentiation , 2006 .

[39]  Julia E. Sero,et al.  The forces of cancer , 2019, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.

[40]  Silviya Zustiak,et al.  Multiwell stiffness assay for the study of cell responsiveness to cytotoxic drugs , 2014, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[41]  Stephanie I. Fraley,et al.  A distinctive role for focal adhesion proteins in three-dimensional cell motility , 2010, Nature Cell Biology.