The EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index: psychometric results of a cross-cultural field study.

BACKGROUND Survey research including multiple health indicators requires brief indices for use in cross-cultural studies, which have, however, rarely been tested in terms of their psychometric quality. Recently, the EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index was developed as an adaptation of the WHOQOL-100 and the WHOQOL-BREF. The aim of the current study was to test the psychometric properties of the EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index. METHODS In a survey on 4849 European adults, the EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index was assessed across 10 countries, with equal samples adjusted for selected sociodemographic data. Participants were also investigated with a chronic condition checklist, measures on general health perception, mental health, health-care utilization and social support. RESULTS Findings indicated good internal consistencies across a range of countries, showing acceptable convergent validity with physical and mental health measures, and the measure discriminates well between individuals that report having a longstanding condition and healthy individuals across all countries. Differential item functioning was less frequently observed in those countries that were geographically and culturally closer to the UK, but acceptable across all countries. A universal one-factor structure with a good fit in structural equation modelling analyses (SEM) was identified with, however, limitations in model fit for specific countires. CONCLUSIONS The short EUROHIS-QOL 8-item index showed good cross-cultural field study performance and a satisfactory convergent and discriminant validity, and can therefore be recommended for use in public health research. In future studies the measure should also be tested in multinational clinical studies, particularly in order to test its sensitivity.

[1]  S. Skevington,et al.  The World Health Organization's WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: Psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A Report from the WHOQOL Group , 2004, Quality of Life Research.

[2]  M. Kosinski,et al.  Calibration of an item pool for assessing the burden of headaches: An application of item response theory to the Headache Impact Test (HIT™) , 2003, Quality of Life Research.

[3]  P. Fayers,et al.  Use of differential item functioning analysis to assess the equivalence of translations of a questionnaire , 2003, Quality of Life Research.

[4]  H. Rumpf,et al.  Screening for mental health: validity of the MHI-5 using DSM-IV Axis I psychiatric disorders as gold standard , 2001, Psychiatry Research.

[5]  A. Coulter,et al.  An assessment of the construct validity of the SF-12 summary scores across ethnic groups. , 2001, Journal of public health medicine.

[6]  J. Chipperfield,et al.  Perceived control in relation to socioeconomic and behavioral resources for health. , 2001, Social science & medicine.

[7]  Evan Wood,et al.  Population health: Concepts and methods , 2000 .

[8]  Kristen G. Anderson,et al.  On the sins of short-form development. , 2000, Psychological assessment.

[9]  J. Ware,et al.  Differential item functioning in the Danish translation of the SF-36. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[10]  M Sullivan,et al.  The factor structure of the SF-36 Health Survey in 10 countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[11]  M Sullivan,et al.  The equivalence of SF-36 summary health scores estimated using standard and country-specific algorithms in 10 countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[12]  M. Power,et al.  Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF Quality of Life Assessment , 1998, Psychological Medicine.

[13]  D. Revicki,et al.  SF-36 summary scores: are physical and mental health truly distinct? , 1998, Medical care.

[14]  Y. Benyamini,et al.  Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. , 1997, Journal of health and social behavior.

[15]  Crispin Jenkinson,et al.  Development and Testing of the UK SF-12 , 1997 .

[16]  M. Baldereschi,et al.  The Italian Longitudinal Study on Aging (ILSA): Design and methods , 1994, Aging.

[17]  A. Aromaa,et al.  Reliability and validity of interview data on chronic diseases. The Mini-Finland Health Survey. , 1993, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[18]  J. Bennett,et al.  The Structure of Self-Reported Physical Health Among the Aged in the United States and Japan , 1991, Medical care.

[19]  Frank M. Andrews,et al.  Social Indicators of Well-Being: Americans' Perceptions of Life Quality , 1976 .

[20]  M. Bullinger,et al.  The conceptual relationship between health indicators and quality of life: results from the cross-cultural analysis of the EUROHIS field study , 2005 .

[21]  J. Chipperfield,et al.  Two views of self-rated general health status. , 2003, Social science & medicine.

[22]  K. Schermelleh-Engel,et al.  Evaluating the Fit of Structural Equation Models: Tests of Significance and Descriptive Goodness-of-Fit Measures. , 2003 .

[23]  B. Zumbo A Handbook on the Theory and Methods of Differential Item Functioning (DIF) LOGISTIC REGRESSION MODELING AS A UNITARY FRAMEWORK FOR BINARY AND LIKERT-TYPE (ORDINAL) ITEM SCORES , 1999 .

[24]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[25]  S. Saxena,et al.  The World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties. , 1998, Social science & medicine.

[26]  C. Hupkens COVERAGE OF HEALTH TOPICS BY SURVEYS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION , 1998 .

[27]  D. Trent,et al.  Promotion of mental health , 1996 .

[28]  L. Doyal,et al.  A Theory of Human Need , 1991 .

[29]  John E. Ware,et al.  SF-36 Health Survey. , 1990 .

[30]  Frank M. Andrews,et al.  Social Indicators of Well-Being , 1976 .