Chemical process research and development in the 21st century: challenges, strategies, and solutions from a pharmaceutical industry perspective.

In process research and development (PR&D), the generation and manipulation of small-molecule drugs ranges from bench-scale (laboratory) chemistry to pilot plant manufacture to commercial production. A broad range of disciplines, including process chemistry (organic synthesis), analytical chemistry, process engineering (mass and heat transfer, unit operations), process safety (chemical risk assessment), regulatory compliance, and plant operation, must be effectively applied. In the critical handover between medicinal chemistry and PR&D, compound production is typically scaled up from a few hundred grams to several kilograms. Can the methodologies applied to the former also satisfy the technical, safety, and scalability aspects that come into play in the latter? Occasionally, the transition might occur smoothly, but more often the situation is the opposite: much work and resources must be invested to design a process that is feasible for manufacturing on pilot scale and, eventually, for commercial production. Authentic examples provide enlightening illustrations of dos and don'ts for developing syntheses designed for round-flask operation into production-scale processes. Factors that are easily underestimated or even neglected in the laboratory, such as method robustness, chemical hazards, safety concerns, environmental impact, availability of starting materials and building blocks in bulk quantities, intellectual property (IP) issues, and the final cost of the product, will come into play and need to be addressed appropriately. The decision on which route will be the best for further development is a crucial event and should come into focus early on the R&D timeline. In addition to scientific and technical concerns, the parameter of speed has come to the forefront in the pharmaceutical arena. Although historically the drug industry has tolerated a total time investment of far more than 10 years from idea to market, the current worldwide paradigm requires a reduction to under 10 years for the specific segment covering preclinical development through launch. This change puts enormous pressure on the entire organization, and the implication for PR&D is that the time allowed for conducting route design and scale-up has shrunk accordingly. Furthermore, molecular complexity has become extremely challenging in many instances, and demand steadily grows for process understanding and knowledge generation about low-level byproduct, which often must be controlled even at trace concentrations to meet regulatory specifications (especially in the case of potentially genotoxic impurities). In this Account, we paint a broad picture of the technical challenges the PR&D community is grappling with today, focusing on what measures have been taken over the years to create more efficiency and effectiveness.

[1]  Hans-Jürgen Federsel,et al.  An Innovative Asymmetric Sulfide Oxidation: The Process Development History behind the New Antiulcer Agent Esomeprazole , 2004 .

[2]  Paul Watts,et al.  Continuous Flow Reactors, a Tool for the Modern Synthetic Chemist , 2008 .

[3]  P. T. Anastas,et al.  Chapter 2 The twelve principles of green engineering as a foundation for sustainability , 2006 .

[4]  Hans-Jürgen Federsel,et al.  A guide to drug discovery: Logistics of process R&D: transforming laboratory methods to manufacturing scale , 2003, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[5]  Hans-Jürgen Federsel,et al.  Searching for scalable processes: addressing the challenges in times of increasing complexity. , 2003, Current opinion in drug discovery & development.

[6]  Hans-Jürgen Federsel Development of a Process for a Chiral Aminochroman Antidepressant: A Case Story† , 2000 .

[7]  H.-J. Federsel,et al.  Chiral Drug Discovery and Development – From Concept Stage to Market Launch , 2007 .

[8]  Hans-Jürgen Federsel The integration of process R&D in drug discovery--challenges and opportunities. , 2006, Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening.

[9]  Hans-Jürgen Federsel Stereoselective Synthesis of Drugs – An Industrial Perspective , 2006 .

[10]  J. S. Carey,et al.  Analysis of the reactions used for the preparation of drug candidate molecules. , 2006, Organic & biomolecular chemistry.

[11]  Hans-Jürgen Federsel,et al.  Mechanism of the Asymmetric Sulfoxidation in the Esomeprazole Process : Effects of the Imidazole Backbone for the Enantioselection , 2009 .

[12]  H -J. Federsel Drug discoverers -you need us! , 2001, Drug discovery today.

[13]  Hans-Ulrich Blaser,et al.  The Chiral Switch of Metolachlor. The Development of a Large-Scale Enantioselective Catalytic Process , 1999 .

[14]  H. Federsel,et al.  DRUG CHIRALITY-SCALE-UP, MANUFACTURING, AND CONTROL , 1993 .

[15]  Paul T Anastas,et al.  Origins, current status, and future challenges of green chemistry. , 2002, Accounts of chemical research.

[16]  Hans-Jürgen Federsel The role of process R&D in drug discovery: Evolution of an interface , 2004 .

[17]  Hans-Jürgen Federsel,et al.  Factors influencing the selectivity in asymmetric oxidation of sulfides attached to nitrogen containing heterocycles. , 2007, Chemical communications.

[18]  Hans-Jürgen Federsel,et al.  To Overcome the Hurdles: Coping with the Synthesis of Robalzotan a Complex Chroman Antidepressant* , 2007 .

[19]  Hans-Ulrich Blaser,et al.  Enantioselective catalysis in fine chemicals production. , 2001, Chemical communications.

[20]  Andreas Sewing,et al.  Helping science to succeed: improving processes in R&D. , 2008, Drug discovery today.

[21]  B. Trost,et al.  The atom economy--a search for synthetic efficiency. , 1991, Science.

[22]  Hans-Jürgen Federsel,et al.  In search of sustainability: process R&D in light of current pharmaceutical industry challenges. , 2006, Drug discovery today.

[23]  David S. Ennis,et al.  Rapid Development of an Enantioselective Synthesis of (R)-1-Hydroxy-7-methoxy-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalene-1-carboxylic Acid , 2003 .

[24]  Bernard McGarvey,et al.  The Use of Routine Process Capability for the Determination of Process Parameter Criticality in Small-molecule API Synthesis , 2008, Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation.

[25]  Hans-Ulrich Blaser The Chiral Switch of (S)‐Metolachlor: A Personal Account of an Industrial Odyssey in Asymmetric Catalysis , 2002 .

[26]  Ivan Marziano,et al.  Critical assessment of pharmaceutical processes--A rationale for changing the synthetic route. , 2006, Chemical reviews.

[27]  Hans-Jürgen Federsel,et al.  Asymmetry on large scale: the roadmap to stereoselective processes , 2005, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[28]  Janet Woodcock,et al.  The FDA critical path initiative and its influence on new drug development. , 2008, Annual review of medicine.

[29]  Hans-Jürgen Federsel Start small, think big — the art of process R&D , 2002, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[30]  Marian Mours SusChem: from vision to action. , 2008, ChemSusChem.

[31]  B. Trost,et al.  On inventing reactions for atom economy. , 2002, Accounts of chemical research.

[32]  Bernhard Hauer,et al.  Industrial methods for the production of optically active intermediates. , 2004, Angewandte Chemie.

[33]  Hans-Jürgen Federsel,et al.  Facing chirality in the 21st century: Approaching the challenges in the pharmaceutical industry. , 2003, Chirality.

[34]  Philip L. Fuchs Increase in Intricacy — A Tool for Evaluating Organic Syntheses , 2001 .

[35]  John Potoski,et al.  Timely synthetic support for medicinal chemists. , 2005, Drug discovery today.

[36]  P. Grubb Patents for Chemicals, Pharmaceuticals and Biotechnology: Fundamentals of Global Law, Practice and Strategy , 1999 .

[37]  H. Federsel,et al.  Handing over the baton: connecting medicinal chemistry with process R&D. , 2008, Drug news & perspectives.