Tissue characterization using a phantom to validate four-dimensional tissue deformation.

PURPOSE This project proposes using a real tissue phantom for 4D tissue deformation reconstruction (4DTDR) and 4D deformable image registration (DIR) validation, which allows for the complete verification of the motion path rather than limited end-point to end-point of motion. METHODS Three electro-magnetic-tracking (EMT) fiducials were implanted into fresh porcine liver that was subsequently animated in a clinically realistic phantom. The animation was previously shown to be similar to organ motion, including hysteresis, when driven using a real patient's breathing pattern. For this experiment, 4DCTs and EMT traces were acquired when the phantom was animated using both sinusoidal and recorded patient-breathing traces. Fiducial were masked prior to 4DTDR for reconstruction. The original 4DCT data (with fiducials) were sampled into 20 CT phase sets and fiducials' coordinates were recorded, resulting in time-resolved fiducial motion paths. Measured values of fiducial location were compared to EMT measured traces and the result calculated by 4DTDR. RESULTS For the sinusoidal breathing trace, 95% of EMT measured locations were within 1.2 mm of the measured 4DCT motion path, allowing for repeatable accurate motion characterization. The 4DTDR traces matched 95% of the EMT trace within 1.6 mm. Using the more irregular (in amplitude and frequency) patient trace, 95% of the EMT trace points fitted both 4DCT and 4DTDR motion path within 4.5 mm. The average match of the 4DTDR estimation of the tissue hysteresis over all CT phases was 0.9 mm using a sinusoidal signal for animation and 1.0 mm using the patient trace. CONCLUSIONS The real tissue phantom is a tool which can be used to accurately characterize tissue deformation, helping to validate or evaluate a DIR or 4DTDR algorithm over a complete motion path. The phantom is capable of validating, evaluating, and quantifying tissue hysteresis, thereby allowing for full motion path validation.

[1]  E. W. Shrigley.  Medical Physics , 1944, British medical journal.

[2]  H. Kubo,et al.  Respiration gated radiotherapy treatment: a technical study. , 1996, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  H. Mostafavi,et al.  Breathing-synchronized radiotherapy program at the University of California Davis Cancer Center. , 2000, Medical physics.

[4]  Torsten Rohlfing,et al.  Modeling liver motion and deformation during the respiratory cycle using intensity-based free-form registration of gated MR images , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[5]  R. Mohan,et al.  Quantifying the predictability of diaphragm motion during respiration with a noninvasive external marker. , 2003, Medical physics.

[6]  W. O'Dell,et al.  Modeling liver motion and deformation during the respiratory cycle using intensity-based nonrigid registration of gated MR images. , 2004, Medical physics.

[7]  John Wong,et al.  Accuracy of a wireless localization system for radiotherapy. , 2005, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  L. Kochian.  Author to whom correspondence should be addressed , 2006 .

[9]  Steve B. Jiang,et al.  Estimation of the delivered patient dose in lung IMRT treatment based on deformable registration of 4D-CT data and Monte Carlo simulations , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  C. Ling,et al.  Evaluation of an automated deformable image matching method for quantifying lung motion in respiration-correlated CT images. , 2006, Medical physics.

[11]  George T. Y. Chen,et al.  Deformable registration of 4D computed tomography data. , 2006, Medical physics.

[12]  Y D Mutaf,et al.  The impact of temporal inaccuracies on 4DCT image quality. , 2007, Medical physics.

[13]  L Dong,et al.  Quantification of accuracy of the automated nonlinear image matching and anatomical labeling (ANIMAL) nonlinear registration algorithm for 4D CT images of lung. , 2007, Medical physics.

[14]  J. Biederer,et al.  Four-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging for the determination of tumour movement and its evaluation using a dynamic porcine lung phantom , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  Steve B. Jiang,et al.  4D-CT lung motion estimation with deformable registration: quantification of motion nonlinearity and hysteresis. , 2008, Medical physics.

[16]  Geoffrey G. Zhang,et al.  Dose mapping: Validation in 4D dosimetry with measurements and application in radiotherapy follow-up evaluation , 2008, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[17]  P. Thomas Fletcher,et al.  4D MAP Image Reconstruction Incorporating Organ Motion , 2009, IPMI.

[18]  P J Keall,et al.  Accuracy in the localization of thoracic and abdominal tumors using respiratory displacement, velocity, and phase. , 2009, Medical physics.

[19]  K. Brock.  Results of a multi-institution deformable registration accuracy study (MIDRAS). , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  P Rassiah-Szegedi,et al.  A proto-type design of a real-tissue phantom for the validation of deformation algorithms and 4D dose calculations. , 2010, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  Robert Michael Kirby,et al.  Quantifying variability in radiation dose due to respiratory-induced tumor motion , 2011, Medical Image Anal..