Integrating ecological perspectives into engineering practices – Perspectives and lessons from Japan

Abstract This article focuses on how ecosystem-based approaches could be mainstreamed in recovery and reconstruction after large scale, rare and infrequent coastal hazards. In doing so, this study reviews historical practices of disaster management in rivers and coasts as well as reconstruction process after the Great East Japan Earthquake (GEJE). It reveals how ecosystem approaches are integrated in river and coast works and highlights some of the relevant policies, technical guidance and guidelines and good practices on the ground. This study also documents how Eco-DRR policy evolved and implemented after the GEJE and addresses some of the challenges in its implementation. In order to draw additional insights, the reconstruction processes of Hurricane Sandy in the United States (US) was also reviewed as GEJE and Sandy shares some common features. Experience from Sandy suggests the importance of the participatory planning process rather than technical guidance or guidelines. Although it is too early to judge whether either reconstruction process was better or not, nor difficult to generalize the conclusion from only two samples, these two experiences suggest only technical guidance and guidelines is not sufficient to mainstream Eco-DRR/CCA in the reconstruction from large scale, rare and infrequent disasters. It is also suggested that the critical role of participatory planning process with cross-sector, cross-professional and interactive design approach may lead more innovative solutions.

[1]  Bregje K. van Wesenbeeck,et al.  How ecological engineering can serve in coastal protection , 2011 .

[2]  J. Watson,et al.  Intact ecosystems provide best defence against climate change , 2016 .

[3]  A. Koschinsky,et al.  An experimental study on the mixing behavior of Ti, Zr, V and Mo in the Elbe, Rhine and Weser estuaries , 2016 .

[4]  H. D. Vriend,et al.  Sustainable hydraulic engineering through building with nature , 2015 .

[5]  Jenny L. Davis,et al.  Living Shorelines: Coastal Resilience with a Blue Carbon Benefit , 2015, PloS one.

[6]  S. Temmerman,et al.  Coastal flood protection by a combined nature-based and engineering approach: modeling the effects of marsh geometry and surrounding dikes , 2016 .

[7]  Bregje K. van Wesenbeeck,et al.  Coastal adaptation with ecological engineering , 2013 .

[8]  F. Renaud,et al.  Developments and opportunities for ecosystem-based disaster risk reduction and climate change adaptation , 2016 .

[9]  N. Dudley,et al.  Protected Areas as Tools for Disaster Risk Reduction. A Handbook for Practitioners , 2015 .

[10]  F. Renaud,et al.  The Role of Ecosystems in Disaster Risk Reduction , 2013 .

[11]  Naoya Furuta,et al.  Progress and Gaps in Eco-DRR Policy and Implementation After the Great East Japan Earthquake , 2016 .

[12]  Kuniyoshi Takeuchi,et al.  A STUDY ON THE PRECEPT OF WATER MANAGEMENT FROM HISTORICAL FACILITIES: Shingen-embankment, Dujangyan and historical documents as lessons , 2005 .

[13]  Stijn Temmerman,et al.  Building land with a rising sea , 2015, Science.

[14]  E. Barbier,et al.  The present and future role of coastal wetland vegetation in protecting shorelines: answering recent challenges to the paradigm , 2011 .

[15]  S. Temmerman,et al.  Ecosystem-based coastal defence in the face of global change , 2013, Nature.

[16]  F. Micheli,et al.  The effectiveness of coral reefs for coastal hazard risk reduction and adaptation , 2014, Nature Communications.

[17]  F. Renaud,et al.  Defining New Pathways for Ecosystem-Based Disaster Risk Reduction and Adaptation in the Post-2015 Sustainable Development Agenda , 2016 .

[18]  Kateryna Wowk,et al.  Future of our coasts: The potential for natural and hybrid infrastructure to enhance the resilience of our coastal communities, economies and ecosystems , 2015 .