Systematically designating conservation areas for protecting habitat quality and multiple ecosystem services

Habitat quality and ecosystem supply are important factors when identifying conservation areas. Traditionally, conservation planning approaches focus solely on habitat. In this study we calculated habitat quality and five other ecosystem service values through the Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Tradeoffs (InVEST) and also identified hotspots for each ecosystem service value through the Local Indicator of Spatial Association (LISA). Conservation areas that protect habitat quality and ecosystem services were simulated using the Zonation software with three scenarios of ecosystem service distribution. Four Boundary Length Penalties were also tested in terms of how well they produce suitable reserve sites. Finally, we developed the LISA-Zonation program which performs systematic conservation planning based on InVEST outputs. The ecosystem services hotspots represent spatial autocorrelations among neighboring cells and ecosystem service values, yielding conservation strategies which balance ecosystem service values with spatial connectivity. Our novel approach finds spatial autocorrelation of ecosystem services to identify conservation areas that provide potential benefits to people. We use the InVEST model to calculate habitat quality and five ecosystem services values.We consider spatial autocorrelation and identify hotspots of ecosystem services.We simulate reserve areas that protect ecosystem services by the Zonation software.We developed the LISA-Zonation program for designating reserve areas.

[1]  Neville D. Crossman,et al.  Systematic landscape restoration using integer programming , 2006 .

[2]  E. Oteros‐Rozas,et al.  Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level , 2013 .

[3]  A. Troy,et al.  Mapping ecosystem services: Practical challenges and opportunities in linking GIS and value transfer , 2006 .

[4]  D. Richardson,et al.  Identifying priority areas for ecosystem service management in South African grasslands. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[5]  Yang Bai,et al.  Spatial characteristics between biodiversity and ecosystem services in a human-dominated watershed , 2011 .

[6]  Neville D. Crossman,et al.  Mapping and modelling ecosystem services for science, policy and practice , 2013 .

[7]  Lu Zhang,et al.  Response of mean annual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale , 2001 .

[8]  T. Brooks,et al.  Global Biodiversity Conservation Priorities , 2006, Science.

[9]  R. D. Groot,et al.  Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making , 2010 .

[10]  K. Gaston,et al.  Balancing alternative land uses in conservation prioritization. , 2011, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[11]  Yu-Pin Lin,et al.  Simulation of ecosystem service responses to multiple disturbances from an earthquake and several typhoons , 2014 .

[12]  K. Gaston,et al.  Reconciling biodiversity and carbon conservation. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[13]  Neville D. Crossman,et al.  Land science contributions to ecosystem services , 2013 .

[14]  J. Nash,et al.  River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles☆ , 1970 .

[15]  Wei-Chih Lin,et al.  Assessing and Mapping Spatial Associations among Oral Cancer Mortality Rates, Concentrations of Heavy Metals in Soil, and Land Use Types Based on Multiple Scale Data , 2014, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[16]  D. Richardson,et al.  Safeguarding Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in the Little Karoo, South Africa , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[17]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Landscape Zonation, benefit functions and target-based planning: Unifying reserve selection strategies , 2007 .

[18]  Peter S. Nelson,et al.  The Effects of Aging on the Molecular and Cellular Composition of the Prostate Microenvironment , 2010, PloS one.

[19]  K. Gaston,et al.  Spatial covariance between biodiversity and other ecosystem service priorities , 2009 .

[20]  Andre Botequilha Leitão,et al.  Measuring Landscapes: A Planner's Handbook , 2006 .

[21]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Methods and workflow for spatial conservation prioritization using Zonation , 2013, Environ. Model. Softw..

[22]  Louise Willemen,et al.  A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services , 2013 .

[23]  Shiliang Su,et al.  Spatially non-stationary response of ecosystem service value changes to urbanization in Shanghai, China , 2014 .

[24]  N. H. Ravindranath,et al.  2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories , 2006 .

[25]  L. Anselin.  Local Indicators of Spatial Association—LISA , 2010 .

[26]  N. Crossman,et al.  Identifying cost-effective hotspots for restoring natural capital and enhancing landscape multifunctionality , 2009 .

[27]  Mathieu Rouget,et al.  Integrating ecosystem services into conservation assessments: a review. , 2007 .

[28]  Kris A. Johnson,et al.  The Impact of Land-Use Change on Ecosystem Services, Biodiversity and Returns to Landowners: A Case Study in the State of Minnesota , 2011 .

[29]  Richard S. Ostfeld,et al.  Human health impacts of ecosystem alteration , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  Grazia Zulian,et al.  Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe , 2012 .

[31]  Gretchen C Daily,et al.  Conservation Planning for Ecosystem Services , 2006, PLoS biology.

[32]  P. Goovaerts.  Medical Geography: A Promising Field of Application for Geostatistics , 2009, Mathematical geology.

[33]  G. Daily,et al.  Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Garry D. Peterson,et al.  Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[35]  M. Conte,et al.  Ecosystem services reinforce Sumatran tiger conservation in land use plans , 2014 .

[36]  G. Daily,et al.  Ecosystem Services in Decision Making: Time to Deliver , 2009 .

[37]  G. Daily,et al.  Notes from the field: Lessons learned from using ecosystem service approaches to inform real-world decisions , 2015 .

[38]  W. H. Wischmeier,et al.  Predicting rainfall erosion losses : a guide to conservation planning , 1978 .

[39]  Richard M Cowling,et al.  An Operational Model for Implementing Conservation Action , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[40]  Perrine Hamel.  Uncertainty Analysis of the InVEST 3 . 0 Nutrient Model : Case Study of the Cape Fear Catchment , NC March 2014 , 2014 .

[41]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Zonation: Spatial conservation planning framework and software version 3.0 user manual , 2011 .

[42]  Kai M. A. Chan,et al.  Ecosystem Services in Conservation Planning: Targeted Benefits vs. Co-Benefits or Costs? , 2011, PloS one.

[43]  L. Anselin.  Local Indicators of Spatial Association—LISA , 2010 .

[44]  G. Daily,et al.  Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales , 2009 .

[45]  S. Polasky,et al.  Projecting Global Land-Use Change and Its Effect on Ecosystem Service Provision and Biodiversity with Simple Models , 2010, PloS one.

[46]  Lijie Pu,et al.  The spatial-temporal changes of the ecosystem service value by land use and land cover change in Circum-Taihu Lake region , 2010, Geoinformatics.

[47]  Gary R. Clay Bla and Mla and.  Measuring Landscapes: A Planner's Handbook , 2008 .

[48]  Jarrett E. K. Byrnes,et al.  Linking Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Current Uncertainties and the Necessary Next Steps , 2014 .