Estimating Physical Activity in Children Aged 8–11 Years Using Accelerometry: Contributions From Fundamental Movement Skills and Different Accelerometer Placements

Accelerometers are widely used to assess physical activity, but it is unclear how effective accelerometers are in capturing fundamental movement skills in children. This study examined the energy expenditure during different physical activities (PA) and calibrated triaxial accelerometry, worn at the wrist, waist and ankle, during children’s PA with attention to object control movement skills and cycling. Thirty children (14 girls) aged 8 to 11 years wore a GENEActiv accelerometer on their non-dominant wrist, dominant wrist, waist and ankle. Children undertook eight, 5-min bouts of activity comprising being lay supine, playing with Lego, slow walking, medium walking, medium paced running, overarm throwing and catching, instep passing a football and cycling at 35 W. VO2 was assessed concurrently using indirect calorimetry. Indirect calorimetry indicated that being lay supine and playing with Lego were classified as sedentary in nature (<1.5 METs), slow paced walking, medium placed walking and throwing and catching were classified as light (1.51–2.99 METs) and running, cycling and instep passing were classified as moderate intensity (>3 METs). ROC curve analysis indicated that discrimination of sedentary activity was excellent for all placements although the ankle performed better than other locations. This pattern was replicated for moderate physical activity (MPA) where the ankle performed better than other locations. Data were reanalyzed removing cycling from the data set. When this analysis was undertaken discrimination of sedentary activity remained excellent for all locations. For MPA discrimination of activity was considered good for waist and ankle placement and fair for placement on either wrist. The current study is the first to quantify energy expenditure in object control fundamental movement skills via indirect calorimetry in children aged 8–11 years whilst also calibrating GENEActiv accelerometers worn at four body locations. Results suggest throwing and catching is categorized as light intensity and instep kicking a football moderate intensity, resulting in energy expenditure equivalent to slow or medium paced walking or cycling and running, respectively. Ankle worn accelerometry appears to provide the most suitable wear location to quantify MPA including ambulatory activity, object control skills and cycling, in children aged 8–11 years.

[1]  Roger G. Eston,et al.  Children's physical activity assessed with wrist- and hip-worn accelerometers. , 2014, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[2]  Gregory J Welk,et al.  Development of new criterion-referenced fitness standards in the FITNESSGRAM® program: rationale and conceptual overview. , 2011, American journal of preventive medicine.

[3]  Stewart G Trost,et al.  Conducting accelerometer-based activity assessments in field-based research. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[4]  J. Staudenmayer,et al.  Classification accuracy of the wrist-worn gravity estimator of normal everyday activity accelerometer. , 2013, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[5]  A. Okely,et al.  Fundamental Movement Skill Interventions in Youth: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis , 2013, Pediatrics.

[6]  Michael J. Duncan,et al.  Validation of the Phillips et al. GENEActiv accelerometer wrist cut-points in children aged 5–8 years old , 2016, European Journal of Pediatrics.

[7]  D. Heil Predicting Activity Energy Expenditure Using the Actical® Activity Monitor , 2006, Research quarterly for exercise and sport.

[8]  S. Blair,et al.  Validation of the actical activity monitor in middle-aged and older adults. , 2011, Journal of physical activity & health.

[9]  Gregory J Welk,et al.  Principles of design and analyses for the calibration of accelerometry-based activity monitors. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[10]  Emma Fortune,et al.  Validity of using tri-axial accelerometers to measure human movement - Part I: Posture and movement detection. , 2014, Medical engineering & physics.

[11]  David F Stodden,et al.  New insight for activity intensity relativity, metabolic expenditure during object projection skill performance , 2018, Journal of sports sciences.

[12]  V. Stiles,et al.  Accelerometer counts and raw acceleration output in relation to mechanical loading. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  Scott E Crouter,et al.  Estimating Energy Expenditure with ActiGraph GT9X Inertial Measurement Unit , 2017, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[14]  N. Perkins,et al.  The inconsistency of "optimal" cutpoints obtained using two criteria based on the receiver operating characteristic curve. , 2006, American journal of epidemiology.

[15]  Shrikant I Bangdiwala,et al.  Energy costs of physical activities in children and adolescents. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[16]  Tom Baranowski,et al.  Decision boundaries and receiver operating characteristic curves: New methods for determining accelerometer cutpoints , 2007, Journal of sports sciences.

[17]  Vincent Onywera,et al.  Improving wear time compliance with a 24-hour waist-worn accelerometer protocol in the International Study of Childhood Obesity, Lifestyle and the Environment (ISCOLE) , 2015, International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity.

[18]  Andrea Mannini,et al.  Activity recognition using a single accelerometer placed at the wrist or ankle. , 2013, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[19]  I-Min Lee,et al.  Definition, measurement, and health risks associated with sedentary behavior. , 2015, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[20]  Michael Catt,et al.  Validation of the GENEA Accelerometer. , 2011, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[21]  B. Holfelder,et al.  Relationship of fundamental movement skills and physical activity in children and adolescents: A systematic review , 2014 .

[22]  Rebecca W. Moore,et al.  Reporting accelerometer methods in physical activity intervention studies: a systematic review and recommendations for authors , 2016, British Journal of Sports Medicine.

[23]  Michael J Duncan,et al.  Step based physical activity guidelines for preschool-aged children. , 2015, Preventive medicine.

[24]  John Gormley,et al.  An evaluation of energy expenditure estimation by three activity monitors , 2013, European journal of sport science.

[25]  C. Metz Basic principles of ROC analysis. , 1978, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[26]  Michael J. Duncan,et al.  Calibration of GENEActiv accelerometer wrist cut-points for the assessment of physical activity intensity of preschool aged children , 2017, European Journal of Pediatrics.

[27]  Gaynor Parfitt,et al.  Calibration of the GENEA accelerometer for assessment of physical activity intensity in children. , 2013, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[28]  Rae-Woong Park,et al.  Different Location of Triaxial Accelerometer and Different Energy Expenditures , 2014, Yonsei medical journal.

[29]  M. Murphy,et al.  Individual calibration of accelerometers in children and their health-related implications , 2018, Journal of sports sciences.

[30]  Scott E Crouter,et al.  Estimating physical activity in youth using an ankle accelerometer , 2018, Journal of sports sciences.

[31]  Derek M. Peters,et al.  Discrepancies in accelerometer-measured physical activity in children due to cut-point non-equivalence and placement site , 2012, Journal of sports sciences.

[32]  Nicola D. Ridgers,et al.  A Calibration Protocol for Population-Specific Accelerometer Cut-Points in Children , 2012, PloS one.

[33]  M. Puyau,et al.  Validation and calibration of physical activity monitors in children. , 2002, Obesity research.

[34]  Ann V Rowlands,et al.  The Measurement and Interpretation of Children's Physical Activity. , 2007, Journal of sports science & medicine.

[35]  Marjolein M. A. Engels,et al.  Identification of children's activity type with accelerometer-based neural networks. , 2011, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.