PUBLIC POLICY NETWORKS AND ‘WICKED PROBLEMS’: A NASCENT SOLUTION?

The last two decades have seen a shift in public services organizations from hierarchies to networks. Network forms are seen as particularly suited to handling ‘wicked problems'. We make an assessment of the nature and impact of this shift. Using recent evidence from the United Kingdom (UK) National Health Service (NHS), we explore the nature and functioning of eight different public policy networks. We are also interested in whether there has been a radical transition – or not – from hierarchical to network forms.

[1]  M. Alvesson Knowledge Work And Knowledge-Intensive Firms , 2004 .

[2]  Andrew Pettigrew,et al.  Managing Through Networks: Some Issues and Implications for the NHS , 1996 .

[3]  T. Reay,et al.  Managing the Rivalry of Competing Institutional Logics , 2009 .

[4]  E. Ferlie,et al.  Networks, Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management: NHS Cancer Networks , 2006 .

[5]  Janet Newman,et al.  Enter the Transformational Leader , 2005 .

[6]  C. Pollitt BUREAUCRACIES REMEMBER, POST‐BUREAUCRATIC ORGANIZATIONS FORGET? , 2009 .

[7]  P. Miller Governing the present , 2008 .

[8]  R. Yin Enhancing the quality of case studies in health services research. , 1999, Health services research.

[9]  Shoshana Zuboff In the Age of the Smart Machine , 1988 .

[10]  A. Pettigrew,et al.  Studying Organizational Change and Development: Challenges for Future Research , 2001 .

[11]  A. Langley,et al.  The Dynamics of Collective Leadership and Strategic Change in Pluralistic Organizations , 2001 .

[12]  E. Ferlie,et al.  Networks in health care : a comparative study of their management, impact & performance , 2010 .

[13]  A. Langley Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[14]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[15]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[16]  Graham P. Martin,et al.  Leadership, Service Reform, and Public-Service Networks: The Case of Cancer-Genetics Pilots in the English NHS , 2009 .

[17]  M. Castells The Network Society , 2004 .

[18]  Leading and Learning , 2006 .

[19]  W. Eggers,et al.  Governing by Network: The New Shape of the Public Sector , 2004 .

[20]  J. Burgoyne,et al.  Politics and organisational learning , 2000 .

[21]  G. Currie,et al.  Transformational Leadership within Secondary Schools in England. A Panacea for Organizational Ills , 2005 .

[22]  Chris Skelcher,et al.  Working Across Boundaries: Collaboration in Public Services , 2002 .

[23]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[24]  Patrick Dunleavy,et al.  Digital Era Governance , 2006 .

[25]  B. Jessop Post‐Fordism and the State , 1996 .

[26]  Jean-Louis Denis,et al.  Leadership and Strategic Change under Ambiguity , 1996 .

[27]  Lyndsay Rashman,et al.  Leading and learning? Knowledge transfer in the Beacon Council Scheme , 2002 .

[28]  Michael Humphreys,et al.  ENTREPRENEURIAL LEADERSHIP IN THE ENGLISH PUBLIC SECTOR: PARADOX OR POSSIBILITY? , 2008 .

[29]  Tony Bovaird,et al.  Developing local governance networks in Europe , 2002 .

[30]  J. Burgoyne,et al.  Politics and Organizational Learning , 2000 .

[31]  Brian P. Bloomfield,et al.  Power and Organizational Transformation through Technology: Hybrids of Electronic Government , 2009 .

[32]  Rosamond Rhodes,et al.  From Marketisation To Diplomacy: It's the Mix that Matters , 1997 .

[33]  G. Currie,et al.  The Impact of Institutional Forces Upon Knowledge Sharing in the UK NHS: The Triumph of Professional Power and the Inconsistency of Policy , 2006 .

[34]  David A. Buchanan,et al.  Nobody in charge: Distributed change agency in healthcare , 2007 .

[35]  E. Ferlie,et al.  Process Transformation: Limitations to Radical Organizational Change within Public Service Organizations , 2004 .

[36]  M. Reed,et al.  'LEADERISM': AN EVOLUTION OF MANAGERIALISM IN UK PUBLIC SERVICE REFORM , 2010 .