Representations of Use and Practice-Bound Imaginaries in Automating the Safety of the Elderly

The present paper examines how representations of prospective use became designed in a novel healthcare technology for elderly people. The case lends support to studies arguing that explicit investigations provide only a part of the representations of prospective use for technology design. It draws attention to a source of representations of use that is at once obvious and under-explored: the professional traditions of developers of technology. To examine this, the concept of practice-bound imaginary is introduced as an alternative to existing terms, such as technological frame. The concept enables better understanding of the interplay of multiple professional practices, the orientation of technology projects and the dynamics of how traditions affect the ideas about prospective use. These analytical possibilities were needed in the case-analysis, as the project was informed by several professional practices, each with their own sets of representations of use. Moreover, in many cases the representations of use were at once representations of viability, medical validity or manufacturability. They were often also inter-animated by adjoining representations from the same practice and compatible assumptions from other practices. Use was not only planned, configured or implicitly assumed, but also was inscribed by the models for conducting design, routine procedures and the messy interactions between people and materials. Designers themselves became aware of the implications of their solutions only after the artefact was reshaped by the resistance of the eventual users and refusers of the device.

[1]  Jerry Avorn Technology , 1929, Nature.

[2]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[3]  H. Blumer,et al.  Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method , 1988 .

[4]  F. Braudel The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II , 1974 .

[5]  Marx W. Wartofsky,et al.  Models: Representation And The Scientific Understanding , 1979 .

[6]  R. Merton,et al.  Genesis and development of a scientific fact , 1979 .

[7]  Edward W. Constant,et al.  The Origins of the Turbojet Revolution , 1982 .

[8]  Dan E. Beauchamp,et al.  The Social Transformation of American Medicine: The Rise of a Sovereign Profession and the Making of a Vast Industry , 1982 .

[9]  Stuart S. Blume,et al.  Insight and Industry: On the dynamics of technological change in Medicine Cambridge , 1991 .

[10]  T. Pinch,et al.  The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology might Benefit Each Other , 1984 .

[11]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication (Learning in Doing: Social, , 1987 .

[12]  A. Siegal,et al.  The Social Transformation of American Medicine: The Rise of a Sovereign Profession and the Making of a Vast Industry , 1987 .

[13]  C. Castoriadis,et al.  The Imaginary Institution of Society , 1987 .

[14]  Lucy Suchman Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication , 1987 .

[15]  T. P. Hughes,et al.  The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology , 1989 .

[16]  P. Gummett The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology , 1988 .

[17]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[18]  S. Woolgar Configuring the User: The Case of Usability Trials , 1990 .

[19]  Bob Johnstone,et al.  Business plan , 1990, Nature.

[20]  Madeleine Akrich,et al.  A Summary of a Convenient Vocabulary for the Semiotics of Human and Nonhuman Assemblies , 1992 .

[21]  S. Webb,et al.  Insight and industry: on the dynamics of technological change in medicine , 1992, Medical History.

[22]  Morten Kyng,et al.  Design at Work , 1992 .

[23]  A. Rainone,et al.  Kuhn Thomas S. , 1993 .

[24]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change ed. by Wiebe E. Bijker, John Law (review) , 1994, Technology and Culture.

[25]  Louis L. Bucciarelli,et al.  Designing Engineers , 1994 .

[26]  B. Asher The Professional Vision , 1994 .

[27]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Of Bicycles, Bakelites, and Bulbs: Toward a Theory of Sociotechnical Change , 1995 .

[28]  M. Vaarama Vanhusten hoivapalvelujen tuloksellisuus hyvinvoinnin tuotanto -näkökulmasta , 1995 .

[29]  Yrjö Engeström,et al.  Mundane tool or object of affection?: the rise and fall of the Postal Buddy , 1995 .

[30]  M. Akrich User Representations: Practices, Methods and Sociology , 1995 .

[31]  Thomas J. Misa,et al.  Managing technology in society: the approach of constructive technology assessment , 1997 .

[32]  Steve Woolgar,et al.  The Machine at Work: Technology, Work and Organization , 1997 .

[33]  Barend van der Meulen,et al.  Getting new technologies together: studies in making sociotechnical order , 1998 .

[34]  Helen Verran Re-imagining land ownership in Australia , 1998 .

[35]  Arie Rip,et al.  Expectations in Technological Developments: an Example of Prospective Structures to be Filled in by Agency , 1998 .

[36]  Reijo Miettinen,et al.  Object Construction and Networks in Research Work: , 1998 .

[37]  Marc Berg,et al.  Differences in Medicine: Unraveling Practices, Techniques, and Bodies , 1999 .

[38]  L. Suchman,et al.  Problematizing 'Innovation' as a Critical Project , 2000 .

[39]  Yrjö Engeström,et al.  Making Expansive Decisions: An Activity-Theoretical Study of Practitioners Building Collaborative Medical Care for Children , 2001 .

[40]  J. Gregory Sorcerer's apprentice : creating the electronic health record, re-inventing medical records and patient care , 2001 .

[41]  Wiebe E T. J. (Trevor J.) Bijker,et al.  SCOT Answers, Other Questions: A Reply to Nick Clayton , 2002 .

[42]  Marcel Stoetzler,et al.  Standpoint theory, situated knowledge and the situated imagination , 2002 .

[43]  E. Beck Meditation, Non-Participation, and Technology in Care Giving Work , 2002 .

[44]  H. Klein,et al.  The Social Construction of Technology: Structural Considerations , 2002 .

[45]  Lucy A. Suchman,et al.  Located Accountabilities in Technology Production , 2002, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[46]  S. Hyysalo Some Problems in the Traditional Approaches to Predicting the Use of a Technology-driven Invention , 2003 .

[47]  K. Seltman Marketing for management. , 2004, Marketing health services.

[48]  N. Oudshoorn,et al.  Configuring the User as Everybody: Gender and Design Cultures in Information and Communication Technologies , 2004 .

[49]  H. Rohracher User Involvement in Innovation Processes : Strategies and Limitations from a Socio-Technical Perspective , 2005 .

[50]  James Stewart,et al.  Social Learning in Technological Innovation: Experimenting with Information and Communication Technologies , 2005 .

[51]  Rjoè,et al.  Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work , 2005 .

[52]  V. Kaptelinin The Object of Activity: Making Sense of the Sense-Maker , 2005 .

[53]  Robin Williams,et al.  The Wrong Trousers? Beyond the Design Fallacy: Social Learning and the User , 2005 .