Discipline and promote: Building infrastructure and managing algorithms in a “structured journalism” project by professional fact-checking groups

News organizations have adapted in various ways to a digital media environment dominated by algorithmic gatekeepers such as search engines and social networks. This article dissects a campaign to actively shape that environment led by professional fact-checking organizations. We trace the development of the Share the Facts “widget,” a device designed to give fact-checks greater purchase in algorithmically governed media networks by driving adoption of a new data standard called ClaimReview. We show how “structured journalism” gave journalists a language for the social and technical challenges involved, and how this infrastructural technology mediates between fact-checkers, audiences, and platform companies. We argue that this standard-setting initiative exhibits both promotional and disciplining facets, offering greater distribution and impact to journalists while also defining their work in specific ways. Crucially, in this case, this disciplining influence reflects internal professional-institutional agendas in an emerging subfield of journalism as much as the demands of platform companies.

[1]  C. Anderson Apostles of Certainty , 2018, Oxford Scholarship Online.

[2]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[3]  Andreas Anastasiou Journalistic authority: Legitimating news in the digital era , 2018 .

[4]  R. Kitchin,et al.  Thinking critically about and researching algorithms , 2014, The Social Power of Algorithms.

[5]  Mike Ananny,et al.  Mike Ananny, Networked Press Freedom: Creating Infrastructures for a Public Right to Hear , 2018, European Journal of Communication.

[6]  T. Gieryn Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional , 1983 .

[7]  Rachel E. Moran Deciding what’s true: The rise of political fact-checking in American journalism , 2018, New Media Soc..

[8]  C. W. Anderson Apostles of Certainty: Data Journalism and the Politics of Doubt , 2018 .

[9]  Gabrielle Durepos Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor‐Network‐Theory , 2008 .

[10]  Mehmet Fatih Çömlekçi Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions that Shape Social Media , 2019 .

[11]  Caitlin Petre Engineering Consent , 2018, Measurable Journalism.

[12]  Lucas Graves,et al.  Boundaries Not Drawn , 2016 .

[13]  Pablo J. Boczkowski,et al.  The Relevance of Algorithms , 2013 .

[14]  Black Boxes as Capacities for and Constraints on Action: Electoral Politics, Journalism, and Devices of Representation , 2013 .

[15]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[16]  David Zeitlyn,et al.  Review of 'Bowker, G. and S.L. Star. 1999. Sorting things out. Classification and its consequences (Inside Technology)' , 2001 .

[17]  S. L. Star,et al.  This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept , 2010 .

[18]  Sofia Ranchordás The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information by Pasquale Frank Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2015 , 2016, European Journal of Risk Regulation.

[19]  Rodrigo Zamith Quantified Audiences in News Production , 2018, Measurable Journalism.

[20]  Pablo J. Boczkowski,et al.  Digitizing the News: Innovation in Online Newspapers , 2004 .

[21]  D. Boyd,et al.  Isomorphism through algorithms: Institutional dependencies in the case of Facebook , 2018 .

[22]  Mark Coddington Clarifying Journalism’s Quantitative Turn , 2015 .

[23]  Frank A. Pasquale The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information , 2015 .

[24]  J. Sinclair If … Then: Algorithmic Power and Politics , 2019, Journal of Communication.

[25]  Angèle Christin Algorithms in practice: Comparing web journalism and criminal justice , 2017 .