Performance and Usability of Smartglasses for Augmented Reality in Precision Livestock Farming Operations

In recent years, smartglasses for augmented reality are becoming increasingly popular in professional contexts. However, no commercial solutions are available for the agricultural field, despite the potential of this technology to help farmers. Many head-wearable devices in development possess a variety of features that may affect the smartglasses wearing experience. Over the last decades, dairy farms have adopted new technologies to improve their productivity and profit. However, there remains a gap in the literature as regards the application of augmented reality in livestock farms. Head-wearable devices may offer invaluable benefits to farmers, allowing real-time information monitoring of each animal during on-farm activities. The aim of this study was to expand the knowledge base on how augmented reality devices (smartglasses) interact with farming environments, focusing primarily on human perception and usability. Research has been conducted examining the GlassUp F4 smartglasses during animal selection process. Sixteen participants performed the identification and grouping trials in the milking parlor, reading different types of contents on the augmented reality device optical display. Two questionnaires were used to evaluate the perceived workload and usability of the device. Results showed that the information type could influence the perceived workload and the animal identification process. Smart glasses for augmented reality were a useful tool in the animal genetic improvement program offering promising opportunities for adoption in livestock operations in terms of assessing data consultation and information about animals.

[1]  Georgios Arsenos,et al.  Grouping strategies and lead factors for ration formulation in milking ewes of the Chios breed , 2005 .

[2]  Tsuyoshi Okayama,et al.  The “Smart Garden” System using Augmented Reality , 2013 .

[3]  Steven K. Feiner,et al.  A touring machine: Prototyping 3D mobile augmented reality systems for exploring the urban environment , 1997, Digest of Papers. First International Symposium on Wearable Computers.

[4]  James R. Lewis,et al.  IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: Psychometric evaluation and instructions for use , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[5]  Byron J. Pierce,et al.  Perceptual Issues in the Use of Head-Mounted Visual Displays , 2006, Hum. Factors.

[6]  Tiago M. Fernández-Caramés,et al.  A Review on Industrial Augmented Reality Systems for the Industry 4.0 Shipyard , 2018, IEEE Access.

[7]  M. Posner,et al.  Visual dominance: an information-processing account of its origins and significance. , 1976, Psychological review.

[8]  Bjorn Ekengren,et al.  Mobile Augmented Reality , 2010 .

[9]  Sunwook Kim,et al.  Influences of augmented reality head-worn display type and user interface design on performance and usability in simulated warehouse order picking. , 2019, Applied ergonomics.

[10]  Pankaj Doke,et al.  Augmented Reality in agriculture , 2011, 2011 IEEE 7th International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications (WiMob).

[11]  Ronald Azuma,et al.  Recent Advances in Augmented Reality , 2001, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[12]  Nicolas Antoine-Moussiaux,et al.  Stakeholder involvement in cattle-breeding program in developing countries: A Delphi survey , 2019, Livestock Science.

[13]  K. Lobeck-Luchterhand,et al.  Effect of prepartum grouping strategy on displacements from the feed bunk and feeding behavior of dairy cows. , 2014, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  Sandra G. Hart,et al.  Nasa-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX); 20 Years Later , 2006 .

[15]  Christoph M Friedrich,et al.  Augmented Reality in Medicine: Systematic and Bibliographic Review , 2019, JMIR mHealth and uHealth.

[16]  Káthia Marçal de Oliveira,et al.  Standardized Usability Questionnaires: Features and Quality Focus , 2016 .

[17]  Giuseppe Todde,et al.  Exploring Smart Glasses for Augmented Reality: A Valuable and Integrative Tool in Precision Livestock Farming , 2019, Animals : an open access journal from MDPI.

[18]  Sunwook Kim,et al.  Impacts of using a head-worn display on gait performance during level walking and obstacle crossing. , 2018, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[19]  Maria Carmela Caria,et al.  Influence of low vacuum levels on milking characteristics of sheep, goat and buffalo , 2013 .

[20]  Marcella Guarino,et al.  Smart Animal Agriculture: Application of Real-Time Sensors to Improve Animal Well-Being and Production. , 2019, Annual review of animal biosciences.

[21]  Maria Wurzinger,et al.  Stakeholder involvement and the management of animal genetic resources across the world , 2017 .

[22]  Timo Oksanen,et al.  Soil sampling with drones and augmented reality in precision agriculture , 2018, Comput. Electron. Agric..

[23]  Pan Hui,et al.  Interaction Methods for Smart Glasses: A Survey , 2017, IEEE Access.

[24]  Giuseppe Todde,et al.  A multivariate statistical analysis approach to characterize mechanization, structural and energy profile in Italian dairy farms , 2016 .

[25]  V E Cabrera,et al.  An income over feed cost nutritional grouping strategy. , 2019, Journal of dairy science.

[26]  T. P. Caudell,et al.  Augmented reality: an application of heads-up display technology to manual manufacturing processes , 1992, Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[27]  Anna Syberfeldt,et al.  Augmented Reality Smart Glasses in the Smart Factory: Product Evaluation Guidelines and Review of Available Products , 2017, IEEE Access.

[28]  Giuseppe Todde,et al.  Evaluation of automated in-line precision dairy farming technology implementation in three dairy farms in Italy , 2019, Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering.

[29]  Ronald Azuma,et al.  A Survey of Augmented Reality , 1997, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[30]  Filippo Gambella,et al.  Energy and Carbon Impact of Precision Livestock Farming Technologies Implementation in the Milk Chain: From Dairy Farm to Cheese Factory , 2017 .

[31]  Chao Cai,et al.  Location-Based Augmented Reality With Pervasive Smartphone Sensors: Inside and Beyond Pokemon Go! , 2017, IEEE Access.

[32]  Mao-Jiun J. Wang,et al.  Usability evaluation of an instructional application based on Google Glass for mobile phone disassembly tasks. , 2019, Applied ergonomics.

[33]  Francesco De Pace,et al.  Augmented Reality in Industry 4.0 , 2018 .

[34]  Pan Hui,et al.  Mobile Augmented Reality Survey: From Where We Are to Where We Go , 2017, IEEE Access.

[35]  Penelope M Sanderson,et al.  Monitoring with Head-Mounted Displays: Performance and Safety in a Full-Scale Simulator and Part-Task Trainer , 2009, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[36]  P. Milgram,et al.  A Taxonomy of Mixed Reality Visual Displays , 1994 .

[37]  Niels Henze,et al.  Reading on Smart Glasses: The Effect of Text Position, Presentation Type and Walking , 2018, CHI.

[38]  J. V. van Arendonk,et al.  Multiple criteria decision-making process to derive consensus desired genetic gains for a dairy cattle breeding objective for diverse production systems. , 2017, Journal of dairy science.

[39]  Thad Starner,et al.  Evaluation of graphical user-interfaces for order picking using head-mounted displays , 2011, ICMI '11.

[40]  Nallapaneni Manoj Kumar,et al.  Wearable Smart Glass: Features, Applications, Current Progress and Challenges , 2018, 2018 Second International Conference on Green Computing and Internet of Things (ICGCIoT).

[41]  Kyeong-Beom Park,et al.  User Interactions for Augmented Reality Smart Glasses: A Comparative Evaluation of Visual Contexts and Interaction Gestures , 2019, Applied Sciences.