Place utility and migration.

The development of behavioral movement models has been hindered by definitional and operational problems. Notwithstanding this fact, almost all migration researchers acknowledge the importance of site and situational attributes in the formulation and testing of behavioral explanations for the migration decision process. Through the use of comple- mentary behavioral methods specifically designed to uncover the relevant attributes of potential migration destinations that are of importance to decision makers, four main variables were found to best characterize the evaluative features of potential destinations: Nearness to and Size of a Major City, Nearness to and Type of Fresh Air Recreational Opportunity, Nearness to Close Relatives, and General Economic Condi- tions. These attributes were stable across a variety of job- constrained choice situations for a sample of young and well- educated migrants. The validation procedure for the variables uncovered by the Grid-Sorting Technique and the Semantic Differential Technique involved the calibration of preferance functions for the individuals and the derivation of predictions for the destinations chosen by the migrants. For sixty-three percent of the sample, preference functions correctly predict- ed locational choice and the predictive fit of the functions could have been improved had response errors by the decision makers been eliminated.

[1]  Risa Palm,et al.  FACTOR LABELLING IN FACTORIAL ECOLOGY , 1972 .

[2]  W. Sewell,et al.  Specialists, laymen and the process of environmental appraisal , 1973 .

[3]  George L. Peterson,et al.  A MODEL OF PREFERENCE: QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE PERCEPTION OF THE VISUAL APPEARANCE OF RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS , 1967 .

[4]  J. Wolpert BEHAVIORAL ASPECTS OF THE DECISION TO MIGRATE , 1965 .

[5]  G. Rushton ANALYSIS OF SPATIAL BEHAVIOR BY REVEALED SPACE PREFERENCE , 1969 .

[6]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[8]  P. Gould ACQUIRING SPATIAL INFORMATION , 1975 .

[9]  W. S. Robinson Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. , 1950, International journal of epidemiology.

[10]  Philip Sarre,et al.  Personal Construct Theory I N the Measurement of Environmental Images , 1975 .

[11]  R. Hudson Images of the Retailing Environment , 1974 .

[12]  G. Iversen Recovering Individual Data in the Presence of Group and Individual Effects , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[13]  E. B. Andersen,et al.  Modern factor analysis , 1961 .

[14]  C. Osgood,et al.  The Measurement of Meaning , 1958 .

[15]  Philip Sarre,et al.  Personal Construct Theory in the Measurement of Environmental Images: Problems and Methods. , 1971 .

[16]  L. A. Brown,et al.  The Intra-Urban Migration Process: a Perspective , 1970 .