Video Messages: A Tool to Improve Surrogate Decision Making

Advance directives (ADs) offer the opportunity for patients to express their desires regarding medical care in advance of any form of incapacitation. However, the efficacy of ADs in achieving care that aligns with patients’ preferences is the subject of intense ethical debate. Current instructional AD formats may not allow for expression of the reasoning or values behind a patient’s care preferences, limiting their utility and efficacy. Here, we review written AD formats and their limitations, and discuss video messages, as a supplement to written ADs, as a potential improvement. While video messages have limitations of their own, their potential use as a tool for better understanding patients’ wishes and values suggests a need for further research and consideration of their application and integration into standard clinical practice.

[1]  R. Santulli,et al.  The Dartmouth Dementia Directive: Experience with a Community-Based Workshop Pilot of a Novel Dementia-Specific Advance Directive , 2020, The Journal of Clinical Ethics.

[2]  M. Ahluwalia,et al.  Improving residents’ skills and confidence on advance directive discussion: a quality improvement project , 2019, Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives.

[3]  R. Tunney,et al.  On the Likelihood of Surrogates Conforming to the Substituted Judgment Standard When Making End-of-Life Decisions for Their Partner , 2019, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[4]  M. Paasche-Orlow,et al.  Feasibility and Patient Perceptions of Video Declarations Regarding End-of-Life Decisions by Hospitalized Patients. , 2018, Journal of palliative medicine.

[5]  S. Harman,et al.  TRIAD VIII: Nationwide Multicenter Evaluation to Determine Whether Patient Video Testimonials Can Safely Help Ensure Appropriate Critical Versus End-of-Life Care , 2017, Journal of patient safety.

[6]  T. Cooney,et al.  TRIAD IV: Nationwide Survey of Medical Students’ Understanding of Living Wills and DNR Orders , 2016, Journal of patient safety.

[7]  B. Elger,et al.  The utility of standardized advance directives: the general practitioners’ perspective , 2016, Medicine, health care, and philosophy.

[8]  D. Wendler,et al.  Can We Improve Treatment Decision-Making for Incapacitated Patients? , 2010, The Hastings Center report.

[9]  Liana Fraenkel,et al.  Inconsistency Over Time in the Preferences of Older Persons with Advanced Illness for Life‐Sustaining Treatment , 2007, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[10]  J. Danks,et al.  Context Changes Choices: A Prospective Study of the Effects of Hospitalization on Life-Sustaining Treatment Preferences , 2006, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[11]  D. Wendler,et al.  The accuracy of surrogate decision makers: a systematic review. , 2006, Archives of internal medicine.

[12]  R. Houts,et al.  Advance directives as acts of communication: a randomized controlled trial. , 2001, Archives of internal medicine.

[13]  S. Terman Will to live in the terminally ill , 1999, The Lancet.

[14]  T. Preston Will to live in the terminally ill , 1999, The Lancet.

[15]  Rid Schulz-Baldes Can we improve Treatment Decision-Making for incapacitated Patients ? , 2010 .

[16]  Cindy Toraya Evaluation of advance directives video education for patients. , 2014, Journal of palliative medicine.