The technology for localization of surgical tools with respect to the patient's reference coordinate system in three to six degrees of freedom is one of the key components in computer aided surgery. Several tracking methods are available, of which optical tracking is the most widespread in clinical use. Optical tracking technology has proven to be a reliable method for intra-operative position and orientation acquisition in many clinical applications; however, the accuracy of such localizers is still a topic of discussion. In this paper, the accuracy of three optical localizer systems, the NDI Polaris P4, the NDI Polaris Spectra (in active and passive mode) and the Stryker Navigation System II camera, is assessed and compared critically. Static tests revealed that only the Polaris P4 shows significant warm-up behavior, with a significant shift of accuracy being observed within 42 minutes of being switched on. Furthermore, the intrinsic localizer accuracy was determined for single markers as well as for tools using a volumetric measurement protocol on a coordinate measurement machine. To determine the relative distance error within the measurement volume, the Length Measurement Error (LME) was determined at 35 test lengths. As accuracy depends strongly on the marker configuration employed, the error to be expected in typical clinical setups was estimated in a simulation for different tool configurations. The two active localizer systems, the Stryker Navigation System II camera and the Polaris Spectra (active mode), showed the best results, with trueness values (mean ± standard deviation) of 0.058 ± 0.033 mm and 0.089 ± 0.061 mm, respectively. The Polaris Spectra (passive mode) showed a trueness of 0.170 ± 0.090 mm, and the Polaris P4 showed the lowest trueness at 0.272 ± 0.394 mm with a higher number of outliers than for the other cameras. The simulation of the different tool configurations in a typical clinical setup revealed that the tracking error can be estimated to be 1.02 mm for the Polaris P4, 0.64 mm for the Polaris Spectra in passive mode, 0.33 mm for the Polaris Spectra in active mode, and 0.22 mm for the Stryker Navigation System II camera.
[1]
Jay B. West,et al.
The distribution of target registration error in rigid-body point-based registration
,
2001,
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.
[2]
Jay B. West,et al.
Designing optically tracked instruments for image-guided surgery
,
2004,
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.
[3]
E P Wilkinson,et al.
Comparative tracking error analysis of five different optical tracking systems.
,
2000,
Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.
[4]
Andrew D. Wiles,et al.
Accuracy assessment and interpretation for optical tracking systems
,
2004,
Medical Imaging: Image-Guided Procedures.
[5]
Fabrice Chassat,et al.
Experimental Protocol for Accuracy Evaluation of 6-d Localizers for Computer-Integrated Surgery: Application to Four Optical Localizers
,
1998,
MICCAI.
[6]
Jay B. West,et al.
Fiducial Point Placement and the Accuracy of Point-based, Rigid Body Registration
,
2001,
Neurosurgery.
[7]
S. Schmerber,et al.
Accuracy evaluation of a CAS system: laboratory protocol and results with 6D localizers, and clinical experiences in otorhinolaryngology.
,
2001,
Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.
[8]
Lena Maier-Hein,et al.
Comparative assessment of optical tracking systems for soft tissue navigation with fiducial needles
,
2008,
SPIE Medical Imaging.