Improving PEEK bioactivity for craniofacial reconstruction using a 3D printed scaffold embedded with mesenchymal stem cells

Objective Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) is a bioinert thermoplastic that has been investigated for its potential use in craniofacial reconstruction; however, its use in clinical practice is limited by a poor integration with adjacent bone upon implantation. To improve the bone–implant interface, two strategies have been employed: to modify its surface or to impregnate PEEK with bioactive materials. This study attempts to combine and improve upon the two approaches by modifying the internal structure into a trabecular network and to impregnate PEEK with mesenchymal stem cells. Furthermore, we compare the newly designed PEEK scaffolds' interactions with both bone-derived (BMSC) and adipose (ADSC) stem cells. Design Customized PEEK scaffolds were designed to incorporate a trabecular microstructure using a computer-aided design program and then printed via selective laser sintering (SLS), a 3D-printing process with exceptional accuracy. The scaffold structure was evaluated using microCT. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to evaluate scaffold morphology with and without mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Adipose and bone marrow mesenchymal cells were isolated from rats and cultured on scaffolds. Cell proliferation and differentiation were assessed using alamarBlue and alkaline phosphatase assays, respectively. Cell morphology after one week of co-culturing cells with PEEK scaffolds was evaluated using SEM. Results SLS 3D printing fabricated scaffolds with a porosity of 36.38% ± 6.66 and density of 1.309 g/cm2. Cell morphology resembled viable fibroblasts attaching to the surface and micropores of the scaffold. PEEK scaffolds maintained the viability of both ADSCs and BMSCs; however, ADSCs demonstrated higher osteodifferentiation than BMSCs (p < 0.05). Conclusions This study demonstrates for the first time that SLS 3D printing can be used to fabricate customized porous PEEK scaffolds that maintain the viability of adipose and bone marrow-derived MSCs and induce the osteodifferentiation of the adipose-derived MSCs. The combination of 3D printed PEEK scaffolds with MSCs could overcome some of the limitations using PEEK biopolymers for load-bearing bone regeneration in craniofacial reconstruction.

[1]  M. Longaker,et al.  Isolation and enrichment of human adipose-derived stromal cells for enhanced osteogenesis. , 2015, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[2]  T. He,et al.  Biomimetic approaches to complex craniofacial defects , 2015, Annals of maxillofacial surgery.

[3]  T. Komori,et al.  Efficient Cell-seeding into Scaffolds Improves Bone Formation , 2010, Journal of dental research.

[4]  C. Maniatopoulos,et al.  Bone formation in vitro by stromal cells obtained from bone marrow of young adult rats , 1988, Cell and Tissue Research.

[5]  A. Uitterlinden,et al.  The activin A‐follistatin system: potent regulator of human extracellular matrix mineralization , 2007, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[6]  W. Walsh,et al.  Plasma-sprayed titanium coating to polyetheretherketone improves the bone-implant interface. , 2015, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[7]  A. Brush,et al.  Peek , 2020, Community eye health.

[8]  Yuki Funauchi,et al.  Massive bone reconstruction with heat‐treated bone graft loaded autologous bone marrow‐derived stromal cells and β‐tricalcium phosphate composites in canine models , 2013, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[9]  G. Balian,et al.  A novel strategy of spine defect repair with a degradable bioactive scaffold preloaded with adipose-derived stromal cells. , 2014, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[10]  H. Skinner,et al.  Composite technology for total hip arthroplasty. , 1988, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  Shinn-Zong Lin,et al.  Efficacy of anterior cervical fusion: Comparison of titanium cages, polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages and autogenous bone grafts , 2008, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience.

[12]  Paolo Giannoni,et al.  A tissue engineering approach to bone repair in large animal models and in clinical practice. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[13]  David F. Williams,et al.  Polyetheretherketone for long-term implantable devices. , 2008, Medical device technology.

[14]  Patrick J Byrne,et al.  Use of customized polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implants in the reconstruction of complex maxillofacial defects. , 2009, Archives of facial plastic surgery.

[15]  Fire -safe polymers and polymer composites , 2003 .

[16]  M. Grant,et al.  In vitro biocompatibility testing of polymers for orthopaedic implants using cultured fibroblasts and osteoblasts. , 1995, Biomaterials.

[17]  Bindiya Patel,et al.  Adipose-derived stem cells: isolation, expansion and differentiation. , 2008, Methods.

[18]  R. Rao,et al.  Biomechanical comparison of supplemental posterior fixations for two-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion , 2013, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[19]  A. Turner,et al.  Polyetheretherketone as a biomaterial for spinal applications. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[20]  Bert Müller,et al.  Differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells on plasma-treated polyetheretherketone , 2014, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine.

[21]  Sabine Neuss,et al.  Assessment of stem cell/biomaterial combinations for stem cell-based tissue engineering. , 2008, Biomaterials.

[22]  C K Chua,et al.  Fabrication and characterization of three-dimensional poly(ether-ether-ketone)/-hydroxyapatite biocomposite scaffolds using laser sintering , 2005, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[23]  V. Sikavitsas,et al.  Mechanical and in Vitro Investigation of a Porous PEEK Foam for Medical Device Implants , 2013, Journal of applied biomaterials & functional materials.

[24]  Richard Tuli,et al.  Adult mesenchymal stem cells and cell-based tissue engineering , 2002, Arthritis research & therapy.

[25]  K. Liao,et al.  Tensile properties, tension-tension fatigue and biological response of polyetheretherketone-hydroxyapatite composites for load-bearing orthopedic implants. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[26]  Miqin Zhang,et al.  Chitosan-alginate hybrid scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[27]  S. Kurtz,et al.  PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[28]  M. Eijken,et al.  Basic techniques in human mesenchymal stem cell cultures: differentiation into osteogenic and adipogenic lineages, genetic perturbations, and phenotypic analyses. , 2011, Current protocols in stem cell biology.

[29]  Xuebin B. Yang,et al.  Bone tissue engineering by using a combination of polymer/Bioglass composites with human adipose-derived stem cells , 2014, Cell and Tissue Research.

[30]  A. Boccaccini,et al.  Biodegradable and bioactive porous polymer/inorganic composite scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[31]  J. Hua,et al.  Osseointegration of acellular and cellularized osteoconductive scaffolds: is tissue engineering using mesenchymal stem cells necessary for implant fixation? , 2015, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.