Offline and online adaptation in prosocial games

Personalization and maintenance of high levels of engagement still remain two of the main challenges in the design of serious games. Towards this end, in this paper we propose a novel adaptation approach for both online and offline adaptation in prosocial games. In this paper, we describe the implementation of an artificial intelligence driven adaptation manager, whose purpose is to direct players towards game content the players are most likely to enjoy (measured in their engagement responses). As a consequence, we demonstrate how the adaptation manager can be used to increase the chances of players attaining the game's specific prosocial learning objectives. Each mechanism (offline and online) processes different information about the player and concerns different types of factors affecting engagement and prosocial behavior. More specifically, the online mechanism maintains a player engagement profile for game elements related to the provision of Corrective Feedback and Positive Reinforcement, in order to adapt existing game content in real time. On the other hand, off-line adaptation matches players to game scenarios according to the players' prosocial ability and the game scenarios' ranking. The efficiency of the proposed adaptation manger as a tool for enhancing students' prosocial skills development is demonstrated through a small scale experiment, under real-conditions in a school environment, using the prosocial game of Path of Trust.

[1]  Netta Weinstein,et al.  When helping helps: autonomous motivation for prosocial behavior and its influence on well-being for the helper and recipient. , 2010, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[2]  Eric N. Wiebe,et al.  Investigating Real-time Predictors of Engagement: Implications for Adaptive Videogames and Online Training , 2015, Int. J. Gaming Comput. Mediat. Simulations.

[3]  Hiroyuki Iida,et al.  An Application of Game-Refinement Theory to Mah Jong , 2004, ICEC.

[4]  Karim Sehaba,et al.  Consistency Verification of Learner Profiles in Adaptive Serious Games , 2016, EC-TEL.

[5]  Alessandro De Gloria,et al.  > Replace This Line with Your Paper Identification Number (double-click Here to Edit) < , 2022 .

[6]  Pieter Spronck,et al.  Dynamic formations in real-time strategy games , 2008, 2008 IEEE Symposium On Computational Intelligence and Games.

[7]  Davide Marocco,et al.  Bio-inspired Computational Algorithms in Educational and Serious Games: Some Examples , 2016, EC-TEL.

[8]  Petros Daras,et al.  Body Motion Analysis for Emotion Recognition in Serious Games , 2016, HCI.

[9]  Petros Daras,et al.  Path of Trust: A Prosocial Co-op Game for Building up Trustworthiness and Teamwork , 2015, GALA.

[10]  Tom Minka,et al.  TrueSkill Through Time: Revisiting the History of Chess , 2007, NIPS.

[11]  Petros Daras,et al.  Exploring the prosociality domains of trust and cooperation, through single and cooperative digital gameplay in Path of Trust , 2016, Int. J. Serious Games.

[12]  A. Elo The rating of chessplayers, past and present , 1978 .

[13]  Julian Togelius,et al.  Digging Deeper into Platform Game Level Design: Session Size and Sequential Features , 2012, EvoApplications.

[14]  Jenova Chen,et al.  Flow in games (and everything else) , 2007, CACM.

[15]  Robin Hunicke,et al.  The case for dynamic difficulty adjustment in games , 2005, ACE '05.

[16]  Georgios N. Yannakakis,et al.  TOWARDS OPTIMIZING ENTERTAINMENT IN COMPUTER GAMES , 2007, Appl. Artif. Intell..

[17]  Petros Daras,et al.  Multimodal affective state recognition in serious games applications , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Imaging Systems and Techniques (IST).

[18]  Shawn Y. Holmes,et al.  Assessing twenty‐first century skills through a teacher created video game for high school biology students , 2010 .

[19]  Pedro Miguel Moreira,et al.  Serious games for rehabilitation: A survey and a classification towards a taxonomy , 2010, 5th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies.