The impact of structure on cognitive complexity in air traffic control

Focused interviews with air traffic controllers and traffic management unit personnel, as well as analysis of traffic flow patterns based on Enhanced Traffic Management System (ETMS) data, suggest that controllers rely on underlying airspace structure to reduce the cognitive complexity of managing an air traffic control situation. To understand how structural elements reduce cognitive complexity, a framework has been developed relating structure, situation awareness, and a controller’s working mental model. It is hypothesized that structure forms the basis for abstractions which simplify a controller’s working mental model. The working mental model is used to support the key tasks of a controller identified by Pawlak (1996): planning, implementing, monitoring, and evaluating. Three examples of structure-based abstractions have been identified: standard flows, groupings, and critical points. This document is based on the thesis of Jonathan M. Histon submitted to the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Aeronautics and Astronautics.

[1]  Mark D. Rodgers,et al.  CONVERSION OF THE CTA, INC., EN ROUTE OPERATIONS CONCEPTS DATABASE INTO A FORMAL SENTENCE OUTLINE JOB TASK TAXONOMY , 1993 .

[2]  Laudeman,et al.  DYNAMIC DENSITY: AN AIR TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT METRIC , 1998 .

[3]  S. Puechmorel,et al.  AIR TRAFFIC COMPLEXITY : TOWARDS INTRINSIC METRICS , 2000 .

[4]  M. Endsley.  Situation Models: An Avenue to the Modeling of Mental Models , 2000 .

[5]  R. H. Mogford,et al.  APPLICATION OF RESEARCH TECHNIQUES FOR DOCUMENTING COGNITIVE PROCESSES IN AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL SECTOR COMPLEXITY AND DECISION MAKING. , 1994 .

[6]  William S. Pawlak,et al.  A FRAMEWORK FOR THE EVALUATION OF AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL COMPLEXITY , 1996 .

[7]  Banavar Sridhar,et al.  Airspace Complexity and its Application in Air Traffic Management , 1998 .

[8]  Barry Kirwan,et al.  Investigating complexity factors in UK air traffic management , 2001 .

[9]  Carol A. Manning,et al.  The Relationship Between Air Traffic Control Communication Events and Measures of Controller Taskload and Workload , 2002 .

[10]  Stuart Berg Flexner,et al.  The Random House dictionary , 1983 .

[11]  Christopher R. Brinton.  DYNAMIC RESECTORIZATION AND COORDINATION TECHNOLOGY: AN EVALUATION OF AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL COMPLEXITY , 1996 .

[12]  R. H. Mogford,et al.  The Complexity Construct in Air Traffic Control: A Review and Synthesis of the Literature. , 1995 .

[13]  J. Rassmusen,et al.  Information Processing and Human - Machine Interaction: An Approach to Cognitive Engineering , 1986 .

[14]  Sanjay S. Vakil,et al.  Analysis of Complexity Evolution Management and Human Performance Issues in Commercial Aircraft Automation Systems , 2000 .

[15]  Elizabeth D. Murphy,et al.  Using Knowledge Exploration Tools to Study Airspace Complexity in Air Traffic Control , 1994 .

[16]  Richard H. Mogford,et al.  Mental Models and Situation Awareness in Air Traffic Control , 1997 .