A Multi-Fidelity Approach for Aerodynamic Performance Computations of Formation Flight

This paper introduces a multi-fidelity computational framework for the analysis of aerodynamic performance of flight formation. The Vortex Lattice and Reynolds Averaged Navier–Stokes methods form the basis of the framework, as low- and high-fidelity, respectively. Initially, the computational framework is validated for an isolated wing, and then two rectangular NACA23012 wings are considered for assessing the aerodynamic performance of this formation; the optimal relative position is through the multi-fidelity framework based on the total drag reduction. The performance estimates are in good agreement with experimental measurements of the same configuration. Total aerodynamic performance of formation flight is also assessed with respect to attitude variations of the lifting bodies involved. The framework is also employed to determine the optimal position of blended-wing-body unmanned aerial vehicles in tandem formation flight.

[1]  K. Ghia,et al.  Editorial Policy Statement on the Control of Numerical Accuracy , 1986 .

[2]  Iztok Lebar Bajec,et al.  Organized flight in birds , 2009, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  F. Hainsworth.  Precision and Dynamics of Positioning by Canada Geese Flying in Formation , 1987 .

[4]  Robert Konrath,et al.  Formation Flight of Low-Aspect-Ratio Wings at Low Reynolds Number , 2017 .

[5]  Mochammad Agoes Moelyadi,et al.  Effects of Leaders Position and Shape on Aerodynamic Performances of V Flight Formation , 2008, ArXiv.

[6]  P. Lissaman,et al.  Formation Flight of Birds , 1970, Science.

[7]  Ilan Kroo,et al.  Aerodynamic Performance of Extended Formation Flight , 2010 .

[8]  Jeffrey P. Slotnick,et al.  Computational Aerodynamic Analysis for the Formation Flight for Aerodynamic Benefit Program , 2014 .

[9]  D. Wilcox.  Formulation of the k-w Turbulence Model Revisited , 2008 .

[10]  H. Weimerskirch,et al.  Energy saving in flight formation , 2001, Nature.

[11]  F. Menter.  Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications , 1994 .

[12]  David C. Wilcox,et al.  Formulation of the k-omega Turbulence Model Revisited , 2007 .

[13]  William H. Mason,et al.  Optimum spanloads in formation flight , 2002 .

[14]  Derek A. Paley,et al.  Wake Estimation and Optimal Control for Autonomous Aircraft in Formation Flight , 2013 .

[15]  Max F. Platzer,et al.  Computational prediction of airfoil dynamic stall , 1998 .

[16]  Haibin Duan,et al.  Multiple UAV distributed close formation control based on in-flight leadership hierarchies of pigeon flocks , 2017 .

[17]  B. Maskew,et al.  Formation flying benefits based on vortex lattice calculations , 1977 .

[18]  Masahito Asai,et al.  Detailed Observations of Interactions of Wingtip Vortices in Close-Formation Flight , 2012 .

[19]  M Gunasekaran,et al.  Behaviour of trailing wing(s) in echelon formation due to wing twist and aspect ratio , 2017 .

[20]  William B. Blake,et al.  Comparison of Predicted and Measured Formation Flight Interference Effects , 2001 .

[21]  K. Chien,et al.  Predictions of Channel and Boundary-Layer Flows with a Low-Reynolds-Number Turbulence Model , 1982 .

[22]  Antonios Tsourdos,et al.  Parametric Study on Formation Flying Effectiveness for a Blended-Wing UAV , 2019, J. Intell. Robotic Syst..