Imaging as a Surrogate for the Early Prediction and Assessment of Treatment Response through the Analysis of 4-D Texture Ensembles (ISEPARATE)

In order to facilitate the use of imaging as a surrogate endpoint for the early prediction and assessment of treatment response, we present a quantitative image analysis system to process the anatomical and functional images acquired over the course of treatment. The key features of our system are deformable registration, texture analysis via texton histograms, feature selection using the minimal-redundancy-maximal-relevance method, and classification using support vector machines. The objective of the proposed image analysis and machine learning methods in our system is to permit the identification of multi-parametric imaging phenotypic properties that have superior diagnostic and prognostic value as compared to currently used morphometric measurements. We evaluate our system for predicting treatment response of breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy using a series of MRI acquisitions.

[1]  Fuhui Long,et al.  Feature selection based on mutual information criteria of max-dependency, max-relevance, and min-redundancy , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[2]  J. Gore,et al.  Quantitative pharmacokinetic analysis of DCE-MRI data without an arterial input function: a reference region model. , 2005, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[3]  B. S. Manjunath,et al.  Texture Features for Browsing and Retrieval of Image Data , 1996, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[4]  R. Edelman,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging (2) , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  Nasser M. Nasrabadi,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2006, Technometrics.

[6]  Benoit M Dawant,et al.  A nonrigid registration algorithm for longitudinal breast MR images and the analysis of breast tumor response. , 2009, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[7]  Colin Studholme,et al.  An overlap invariant entropy measure of 3D medical image alignment , 1999, Pattern Recognit..

[8]  Jyh-Horng Chen,et al.  Angiogenic response of locally advanced breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy evaluated with parametric histogram from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention - MICCAI 2007, 10th International Conference, Brisbane, Australia, October 29 - November 2, 2007, Proceedings, Part I , 2007, MICCAI.

[10]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines , 2011, TIST.

[11]  Lydia Ng,et al.  Quantitative image analysis: software systems in drug development trials. , 2003, Drug discovery today.

[12]  M. Knopp,et al.  Estimating kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast‐enhanced t1‐weighted MRI of a diffusable tracer: Standardized quantities and symbols , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[13]  Christopher M. Bishop,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning (Information Science and Statistics) , 2006 .

[14]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  Segmentation and Classification of Breast Tumor Using Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Images , 2007, MICCAI.

[15]  Andrew Zisserman,et al.  Classifying Images of Materials: Achieving Viewpoint and Illumination Independence , 2002, ECCV.

[16]  Cordelia Schmid,et al.  Local Features and Kernels for Classification of Texture and Object Categories: A Comprehensive Study , 2006, 2006 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop (CVPRW'06).

[17]  Chiara Zuiani,et al.  Assessment of breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: is volumetric MRI a reliable tool? , 2009, European journal of radiology.

[18]  Mads Nielsen,et al.  Computer Vision — ECCV 2002 , 2002, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.