Explaining greater test use for selection: the role of HR professionals in a world of expanding regulation

In recent decades there has been a well-documented increase in organisations' use of formal tests for selection purposes. This article investigates whether tests' technical qualities and predictive validity are the critical determinants of take-up, or whether other organisational and contextual factors are more important. Case studies of organisations were used to identify the factors driving change and Workplace Employee Relations Survey data were analysed to determine the consistency of the findings with national data. The single most important factor appears to be the regulatory environment, with tests used as a precautionary measure to protect selection decisions from challenge. The growing formal professionalisation of HR departments is also important, and the influence of both factors is consistent with current theories of organisational decision-making. Continued growth in test use is likely, but the implications for efficiency in selection are less clear.

[1]  Peter Cappelli,et al.  UNDERSTANDING THE DETERMINANTS OF EMPLOYER USE OF SELECTION METHODS , 2003 .

[2]  I. Robertson,et al.  Work-sample tests of trainability: A meta-analysis. , 1989 .

[3]  Ivan T. Robertson,et al.  Personality and job competences: The criterion-related validity of some personality variables , 1993 .

[4]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[5]  David E. Terpstra,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP OF STAFFING PRACTICES TO ORGANIZATIONAL LEVEL MEASURES OF PERFORMANCE , 2006 .

[6]  B. Lupton Pouring the coffee at interviews , 2000 .

[7]  B. E. Becker,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF LABOR MARKETS ON HUMAN RESOURCES UTILITY ESTIMATES , 1989 .

[8]  Gary Johns,et al.  CONSTRAINTS ON THE ADOPTION OF PSYCHOLOGY‐BASED PERSONNEL PRACTICES: LESSONS FROM ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION , 1993 .

[9]  Neil Conway,et al.  Human Resource Management and Corporate Performance in the UK , 2003 .

[10]  Raymond Caldwell Champions, adapters, consultants and synergists: the new change agents in HRM , 2001 .

[11]  Ann Marie Ryan,et al.  AN INTERNATIONAL LOOK AT SELECTION PRACTICES: NATION AND CULTURE AS EXPLANATIONS FOR VARIABILITY IN PRACTICE , 1999 .

[12]  Zella King,et al.  Power, Innovation and Problem‐Solving: The Personnel Managers’ Three Steps to Heaven? , 2004 .

[13]  James S. Russell A Review of Fair Employment Cases in the Field of Training. , 1984 .

[14]  George C. Thornton,et al.  Meta-analysis of assessment center validity. , 1987 .

[15]  B. Townley Practical Reason and Performance Appraisal , 1999 .

[16]  P. Muchinsky WHEN THE PSYCHOMETRICS OF TEST DEVELOPMENT MEETS ORGANIZATIONAL REALITIES: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR ORGANIZATIONAL CHANGE, EXAMPLES, AND RECOMMENDATIONS , 2004 .

[17]  Kevin D. Carlson,et al.  The Staffing Cycles Framework: Viewing Staffing as a System of Decision Events , 2003 .

[18]  B. Gerhart,et al.  The Impact of Human Resource Management on Organizational Performance: Progress and Prospects , 1996 .

[19]  R. Faley,et al.  THE IMPLICATIONS OF PROFESSIONAL AND LEGAL GUIDELINES FOR COURT DECISIONS INVOLVING CRITERION-RELATED VALIDITY: A REVIEW AND ANALYSIS , 1985 .

[20]  Michael P. Kirsch,et al.  METAANALYSES OF VALIDITY STUDIES PUBLISHED BETWEEN 1964 AND 1982 AND THE INVESTIGATION OF STUDY CHARACTERISTICS , 1984 .

[21]  Sue Newell,et al.  Management selection: A comparative survey of methods used in top British and French companies , 1991 .

[22]  Harry Scarbrough,et al.  Evaluating human capital: An exploratory study of management practice. , 2004 .

[23]  S. Blinkhorn,et al.  The insignificance of personality testing , 1990, Nature.

[24]  D. Bartram,et al.  The recruitment and selection of young people by small businesses , 1995 .

[25]  D. Bartram,et al.  Assessment in Organisations , 2004 .

[26]  K. Hoque,et al.  Counting angels: a comparison of personnel and HR specialists , 2001 .

[27]  Luis Aramburu-Zabala Higuera,et al.  Adverse Impact in Personnel Selection: The Legal Framework and Test Bias , 2001 .

[28]  S. Fox,et al.  ENTRY‐LEVEL POLICE CANDIDATE ASSESSMENT CENTER: AN EFFICIENT TOOL OR A HAMMER TO KILL A FLY? , 2002 .

[29]  M. Moran,et al.  The British Regulatory State: High Modernism and Hyper-Innovation , 2003 .

[30]  Why Do Employers Use Selection Tests? Evidence from British Workplaces , 2002 .

[31]  F. Schmidt,et al.  The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. , 1998 .