Development of morphological awareness in Chinese and English

The development of morphological awareness in Chinese and English was investigated in the current study involving 412 Taiwanese and 256 American students in second, fourth, and sixth grades. The results from both Chinese-speaking and English-speaking students indicate that the morphological awareness develops with grade level and is strongly related to reading ability. More proficient readers outperformed less proficient readers when asked to (1) recognize morphological relationships between words, (2) discriminate word parts having the same or different meanings, (3) select the best interpretations of low-frequency derivatives and compounds composed of high-frequency parts, and (4) judge the well-formedness of novel derivatives and compounds. Chinese students' acquisition of derivational morphology seems to lag behind that of compounding rules, which might reflect the nature of Chinese word formation in that there are far fewer derivatives than compounds in Chinese.

[1]  Peter Bryant,et al.  Learning to Read Chinese Beyond the Logographic Phase , 1997 .

[2]  S. Kuczaj The acquisition of regular and irregular past tense forms , 1977 .

[3]  Rumjahn Hoosain,et al.  Psycholinguistic Implications for Linguistic Relativity: A Case Study of Chinese , 1991 .

[4]  D. Mahony Using sensitivity to word structure to explain variance in high school and college level reading ability , 1994 .

[5]  V. Mann,et al.  Reading ability and sensitivity to morphological relations , 2000 .

[6]  C. Leong The effects of morphological structure on reading proficiency—A developmental study , 1989 .

[7]  Joanne F. Carlisle,et al.  Phonological and morphological awareness in first graders , 1993, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[8]  S Pinker,et al.  Overregularization in language acquisition. , 1992, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development.

[9]  Katherine Wysocki,et al.  Deriving Word Meanings through Morphological Generalization. , 1987 .

[10]  William E. Nagy,et al.  The acquisition of English derivational morphology , 1989 .

[11]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Facets of Metalinguistic Awareness that Contribute to Chinese Literacy , 2002 .

[12]  J. Carlisle Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading , 2000 .

[13]  J. Berko The Child's Learning of English Morphology , 1958 .

[14]  R. Sternberg Most vocabulary is learned from context. , 1987 .

[15]  Marcus Taft,et al.  The representation of bound morphemes in the lexicon: A Chinese study. , 1995 .

[16]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Phonetic awareness: Knowledge of orthography–phonology relationships in the character acquisition of Chinese children. , 2000 .

[17]  K. Forster,et al.  Lexical storage and retrieval of polymorphemic and polysyllabic words. , 1976 .

[18]  William E. Nagy,et al.  Morphological families in the internal lexicon , 1989 .

[19]  J. Packard The Morphology of Chinese: A Linguistic and Cognitive Approach , 2000 .

[20]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Reading comprehension and the assessment and acquisition of word knowledge , 1982 .

[21]  Joanne F. Carlisle,et al.  Knowledge of derivational morphology and spelling ability in fourth, sixth, and eighth graders , 1988, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[22]  E. Dale,et al.  Techniques of teaching vocabulary , 1971 .

[23]  Anne E. Fowler,et al.  The role of phonology and orthography in morphological awareness. , 1995 .

[24]  Dominiek Sandra,et al.  The morphology of the mental lexicon: Internal word structure viewed from a psycholinguistic perspective , 1994 .

[25]  Children's analysis of derivational suffix meanings. , 1996, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[26]  Eve V. Clark,et al.  Compound Nouns and Category Structure in Young Children. , 1985 .

[27]  P. David Pearson Handbook of reading research. , 1990 .

[28]  Joanne F. Carlisle,et al.  Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. , 1995 .

[29]  R. Burchfield Frequency Analysis of English Usage: Lexicon and Grammar. By W. Nelson Francis and Henry Kučera with the assistance of Andrew W. Mackie. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. 1982. x + 561 , 1985 .

[30]  Dominiek Sandra,et al.  On the Representation and Processing of Compound Words: Automatic Access to Constituent Morphemes Does Not Occur , 1990 .

[31]  Séverine Casalis,et al.  Morphological analysis, phonological analysis and learning to read French: a longitudinal study , 2000 .

[32]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  How Many Words are There in Printed School English , 1984 .

[33]  Sheida White,et al.  Morphological Analysis: Implications for Teaching and Understanding Vocabulary Growth. , 1989 .

[34]  Andrea Tyler,et al.  Use of derivational morphology during reading , 1990, Cognition.

[35]  R. Silvestri,et al.  A Developmental Analysis of the Acquisition of Compound Words. , 1977 .

[36]  J. M. Anglin Vocabulary Development: A Morphological Analysis , 1994 .

[37]  U. Goswami,et al.  Phonological and Lexical Processes , 2000 .

[38]  J. Baron,et al.  Individual differences in acquisition of derivational morphology , 1982 .

[39]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Incidental learning of word meanings while reading: a Chinese and American cross-cultural study , 1994 .

[40]  Danling Peng,et al.  Decomposed Storage in the Chinese Lexicon , 1992 .

[41]  Rumjahn Hoosain,et al.  Psychological Reality of the Word in Chinese , 1992 .

[42]  Virginia A. Mann,et al.  The relation between reading ability and morphological skills: Evidence from derivational suffixes , 2000 .