Against Formal Phonology

Chomsky and Halle (1968) and many formal linguists rely on the notion of a universally available phonetic space defined in discrete time. This assumption plays a central role in phonological theory. Discreteness at the phonetic level guarantees the discreteness of all other levels of language. But decades of phonetics research demonstrate that there exists no universal inventory of phonetic objects. We discuss three kinds of evidence: first, phonologies differ incommensurably. Second, some phonetic characteristics of languages depend on intrinsically temporal patterns, and, third, some linguistic sound categories within a language are different from each other despite a high degree of overlap that precludes distinctness. Linguistics has mistakenly presumed that speech can always be spelled with letter-like tokens. A variety of implications of these conclusions for research in phonology are discussed.

[1]  E. Fischer‐Jorgensen,et al.  On the definition of phoneme categories on a distributional basis , 1952 .

[2]  A. Liberman,et al.  Tempo of frequency change as a cue for distinguishing classes of speech sounds. , 1956, Journal of experimental psychology.

[3]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Duration of Syllable Nuclei in English , 1960 .

[4]  M. Halle,et al.  Preliminaries to Speech Analysis: The Distinctive Features and Their Correlates , 1961 .

[5]  William Gamwell Moulton,et al.  The sounds of English and German. , 1962 .

[6]  W. Labov.  The social motivation of a sound change , 1963 .

[7]  Noam Chomsky.  Current Issues in Linguistic Theory , 1964 .

[8]  L. Lisker,et al.  A Cross-Language Study of Voicing in Initial Stops: Acoustical Measurements , 1964 .

[9]  J. Fodor,et al.  The Structure of Language: Readings in the Philosophy of Language , 1966 .

[10]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .

[11]  P. Lieberman.  On the Acoustic Basis of the Perception of Intonation by Linguists , 1965 .

[12]  Bengt Sigurd,et al.  Phonotactic structures in Swedish , 1965 .

[13]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[14]  L. Lisker,et al.  Some Effects of Context On Voice Onset Time in English Stops , 1967, Language and speech.

[15]  A M Liberman,et al.  Perception of the speech code. , 1967, Psychological review.

[16]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  The Sound Pattern of English , 1968 .

[17]  Peter Ladefoged.  A phonetic study of West African languages: An auditory-instrumental survey , 1968 .

[18]  Matthew Y. Chen.  Vowel Length Variation as a Function of the Voicing of the Consonant Environment , 1970 .

[19]  Arthur S. Abramson,et al.  DISTINCTIVE FEATURES AND LARYNGEAL CONTROL , 1971 .

[20]  P. D. Eimas,et al.  Speech Perception in Infants , 1971, Science.

[21]  D. Dinnsen,et al.  The three degrees of vowel length in German , 1971 .

[22]  Kenneth N. Stevens,et al.  On the quantal nature of speech , 1972 .

[23]  Geoffrey Sampson,et al.  IS THERE A UNIVERSAL PHONETIC ALPHABET , 1974 .

[24]  J. Fodor,et al.  The Language of Thought , 1980 .

[25]  Allen Newell,et al.  Computer science as empirical inquiry: symbols and search , 1976, CACM.

[26]  D. Klatt.  Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: acoustic and perceptual evidence. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  Robert A. Fox,et al.  Dental flaps, vowel duration and rule ordering in American English , 1977 .

[28]  V. Zue,et al.  Acoustic study of medial /t,d/ in American English , 1979 .

[29]  Mark Liberman,et al.  The intonational system of English , 1979 .

[30]  R. Port,et al.  Relation between voice-onset time and vowel duration. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  Robert F. Port,et al.  Temporal Compensation and Universal Phonetics , 1980 .

[32]  P. Ladefoged.  WHAT ARE LINGUISTIC SOUNDS MADE OF , 1980 .

[33]  R. Port.  Linguistic timing factors in combination. , 1981, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  Robert F. Port,et al.  On the structure of the phonetic space with special reference to speech timing , 1981 .

[35]  R. Port,et al.  Consonant/vowel ratio as a cue for voicing in English , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[36]  Robert F. Port,et al.  Segmental features and implementation in acquisition of English by Arabic speakers , 1983 .

[37]  S. F. Disner.  Vowel quality : the relation between universal and language specific factors , 1983 .

[38]  J. Werker,et al.  Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life , 1984 .

[39]  P. Keating.  PHONETIC AND PHONOLOGICAL REPRESENTATION OF STOP CONSONANT VOICING , 1984 .

[40]  Betty S. Phillips,et al.  Word Frequency and the Actuation of Sound Change , 1984 .

[41]  M. Fourakis,et al.  On the ‘Incomplete Neutralization’ of German Final Obstruents , 1984 .

[42]  John Haugeland,et al.  Artificial intelligence - the very idea , 1987 .

[43]  P. Ladefoged,et al.  Phonetic linguistics : essays in honor of Peter Ladefoged , 1987 .

[44]  Louisa M. Slowiaczek,et al.  On the neutralizing status of Polish word-final devoicing , 1985 .

[45]  R. Port,et al.  Neutralization of syllable-final voicing in German , 1985 .

[46]  Douglas L. Hintzman,et al.  "Schema Abstraction" in a Multiple-Trace Memory Model , 1986 .

[47]  J Hillenbrand,et al.  Differential use of temporal cues to the /s/-/z/ contrast by native and non-native speakers of English. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[48]  R. Nosofsky.  Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[49]  L. Lisker.  “Voicing” in English: A Catalogue of Acoustic Features Signaling /b/ Versus /p/ in Trochees , 1986, Language and speech.

[50]  R. Nosofsky.  Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. , 1986 .

[51]  R. Port,et al.  Evidence for mora timing in Japanese. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[52]  John Kingston,et al.  Papers in Laboratory Phonology: Index of names , 1990 .

[53]  B. Lindblom,et al.  On the Notion "Possible Speech Sound , 1990 .

[54]  Robert F. Port,et al.  Representation and Recognition of Temporal Patterns , 1990 .

[55]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  On attributing grammars to dynamical systems , 1990 .

[56]  L. Shriberg,et al.  Reliability studies in broad and narrow phonetic transcription , 1991 .

[57]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: a first report. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[58]  C. Browman,et al.  Articulatory Phonology: An Overview , 1992, Phonetica.

[59]  J. Flege,et al.  Production of the word-final English /t/-/d/ contrast by native speakers of English, Mandarin, and Spanish. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[60]  J. Kruschke,et al.  ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. , 1992, Psychological review.

[61]  Christoph Draxler,et al.  Consistency of judgements in manual labelling of phonetic segments: the distinction between clear and unclear cases , 1992, ICSLP.

[62]  Susan D. Lima,et al.  The linguistics of literacy , 1992 .

[63]  Zenon W. Pylyshyn,et al.  Connectionism and cognitive architecture , 1993 .

[64]  J. Flege.  Production and perception of a novel, second-language phonetic contrast. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[65]  Hiroko Hagiwara,et al.  Linguistics and Brain Science , 1994 .

[66]  Mieko S. Han,et al.  Acoustic manifestations of mora timing in Japanese , 1994 .

[67]  Jörgen Pind,et al.  Speaking rate, VOT, and quantity: The search for higher‐order invariants for two Icelandic speech cues , 1994 .

[68]  Robert L. Goldstone.  The role of similarity in categorization: providing a groundwork , 1994, Cognition.

[69]  B. Hayes.  Metrical Stress Theory: Principles and Case Studies , 1995 .

[70]  W. Strange.  Speech perception and linguistic experience : issues in cross-language research , 1995 .

[71]  A. Bradlow,et al.  A comparative acoustic study of English and Spanish vowels. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[72]  T. Gelder,et al.  Mind as Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition , 1995 .

[73]  J. Pind,et al.  Speaking rate, voice-onset time, and quantity: The search for higher-order invariants for two Icelandic speech cues , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[74]  A. Opstal.  Dynamic Patterns: The Self-Organization of Brain and Behavior , 1995 .

[75]  P. Kuhl,et al.  Linguistic experience and the "perceptual magnet effect." , 1995 .

[76]  A. Clark.  Being There: Putting Brain, Body, and World Together Again , 1996 .

[77]  F. Guenther,et al.  The perceptual magnet effect as an emergent property of neural map formation. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[78]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Paradigm Uniformity and the Phonetics-Phonology Boundary , 1996 .

[79]  P. Ladefoged,et al.  The sounds of the world's languages , 1996 .

[80]  Elliot Saltzman,et al.  Dynamics and coordinate systems in skilled sensorimotor activity , 1996 .

[81]  Robert F. Port,et al.  The discreteness of phonetic elements and formal linguistics: response to A. Manaster Ramer , 1996 .

[82]  A. M. Ramer.  A letter from an incompletely neutral phonologist , 1996 .

[83]  Robert F. Port,et al.  Naive time, temporal patterns, and human audition , 1996 .

[84]  Gavan Lintern,et al.  Dynamic patterns: The self-organization of brain and behavior , 1997, Complex.

[85]  Robert F. Port,et al.  Effects of temporal correction on intelligibility of foreign-accented English , 1997 .

[86]  J. Mullennix,et al.  Talker Variability in Speech Processing , 1997 .

[87]  Jan P. H. van Santen,et al.  Segmental Duration and Speech Timing , 1997, Computing Prosody.

[88]  Yoshinori Sagisaka,et al.  Computing Prosody, Computational Models for Processing Spontaneous Speech , 2011 .

[89]  S. Goldinger.  Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. , 1998, Psychological review.

[90]  Robert F. Port,et al.  Rhythmic constraints on stress timing in English , 1998 .

[91]  S. Grossberg.  How does the cerebral cortex work? Learning, attention, and grouping by the laminar circuits of visual cortex. , 1999, Spatial vision.

[92]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Philosophy in the flesh : the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought , 1999 .

[93]  J. Pierrehumbert.  What people know about sounds of language , 1999 .

[94]  Taehong Cho,et al.  Variation and universals in VOT: evidence from 18 languages , 1999 .

[95]  E. Large,et al.  The dynamics of attending: How people track time-varying events. , 1999 .

[96]  A. Marantz,et al.  Image, language, brain : papers from the First Mind Articulation Project Symposium , 2000 .

[97]  N. Chater,et al.  Rational models of cognition , 1998 .

[98]  James H. Fetzer.  Computers and Cognition: Why Minds are not Machines , 2000 .

[99]  S. Grossberg,et al.  The resonant dynamics of speech perception: interword integration and duration-dependent backward effects. , 2000 .

[100]  J. Pierrehumbert.  The phonetic grounding of phonology , 2000 .

[101]  E. Vajda.  Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: A Guide to the Use of the International Phonetic Alphabet , 2000 .

[102]  Nick Rowe,et al.  Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Dramatherapy , 2000 .

[103]  S. Grossberg,et al.  The resonant dynamics of speech perception: interword integration and duration-dependent backward effects. , 2000, Psychological review.

[104]  Janet B. Pierrehumbert,et al.  Word-specific phonetics , 2001 .

[105]  Joan L. Bybee,et al.  Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure , 2001 .

[106]  John J. McCarthy,et al.  A Thematic Guide to Optimality Theory , 2001 .

[107]  Carlos Gussenhoven,et al.  Laboratory Phonology 7 , 2002 .

[108]  Edward Flemming,et al.  Auditory Representations in Phonology , 2002 .

[109]  R. Jackendoff.  Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution , 2002 .

[110]  Ian Maddieson.  Vowel spacing in four‐vowel systems , 2003 .

[111]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Phonetics and Phonology in Language Comprehension and Production: Differences and Similarities , 2003, Phonetica.

[112]  A. Clark,et al.  Books , 2004, INTR.

[113]  John Local,et al.  Variable domains and variable relevance: interpreting phonetic exponents , 2003, J. Phonetics.

[114]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  Resonant neural dynamics of speech perception , 2003, J. Phonetics.

[115]  K. Stevens,et al.  A Note on Laryngeal Features , 2003 .

[116]  L. Goldstein,et al.  Articulatory Phonology: A phonology for public language use , 2003 .

[117]  Sarah Hawkins,et al.  Roles and representations of systematic fine phonetic detail in speech understanding , 2003, J. Phonetics.

[118]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Concepts and Categorization , 2003 .

[119]  Robert F. Port,et al.  Meter and speech , 2003, J. Phonetics.

[120]  James Hillenbrand,et al.  Quality of American English front vowels before /r/ , 2003, Journal of the International Phonetic Association.

[121]  Matthias Scheutz,et al.  When Physical Systems Realize Functions... , 1999, Minds and Machines.

[122]  Robert F. Port,et al.  Speech Rhythm in English and Japanese , 2014 .

[123]  Allard Jongman,et al.  Incomplete neutralization and other sub-phonemic durational differences in production and perception: evidence from Dutch , 2004, J. Phonetics.

[124]  Grover Hudson,et al.  PHONOLOGY AND LANGUAGE USE , 2004 .

[125]  Leslie Marsh.  Natural-Born Cyborgs: Minds, Technologies, and the Future of Human Intelligence , 2009 .

[126]  Jean Christophe Verstraeh.  Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure , 2005 .