Accident Prediction Models With and Without Trend: Application of the Generalized Estimating Equations Procedure

Accident prediction models (APMs) are useful tools for estimating the expected number of accidents on entities such as intersections and road sections. These estimates typically are used in the identification of sites for possible safety treatment and in the evaluation of such treatments. An APM is, in essence, a mathematical equation that expresses the average accident frequency of a site as a function of traffic flow and other site characteristics. The reliability of an APM estimate is enhanced if the APM is based on data for as many years as possible, especially if data for those same years are used in the safety analysis of a site. With many years of data, however, it is necessary to account for the year-to-year variation, or trend, in accident counts because of the influence of factors that change every year. To capture this variation, the count for each year is treated as a separate observation. Unfortunately, the disaggregation of the data in this manner creates a temporal correlation that presents difficulties for traditional model calibration procedures. An application is presented of a generalized estimating equations (GEE) procedure to develop an APM that incorporates trend in accident data. Data for the application pertain to a sample of four-legged signalized intersections in Toronto, Canada, for the years 1990 through 1995. The GEE model incorporating the time trend is shown to be superior to models that do not accommodate trend and/or the temporal correlation in accident data.

[1]  R Kulmala,et al.  SAFETY AT RURAL THREE- AND FOUR-ARM JUNCTIONS. DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATION OF ACCIDENT PREDICTION MODELS. , 1995 .

[2]  P. Green.  Iteratively reweighted least squares for maximum likelihood estimation , 1984 .

[3]  Anthony C. Atkinson,et al.  Plots, transformations, and regression : an introduction to graphical methods of diagnostic regression analysis , 1987 .

[4]  E. Hauer,et al.  ESTIMATION OF SAFETY AT SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS (WITH DISCUSSION AND CLOSURE) , 1988 .

[5]  Ezra Hauer,et al.  EFFECT OF RESURFACING ON SAFETY OF TWO-LANE RURAL ROADS IN NEW YORK STATE , 1994 .

[6]  G. Guo.  Negative Multinomial Regression Models for Clustered Event Counts , 1996 .

[7]  R. H. Myers.  Classical and modern regression with applications , 1986 .

[8]  K Y Liang,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. , 1986, Biometrics.

[9]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1992 .

[10]  Ezra Hauer,et al.  Estimation of safety at signalized intersections , 1988 .

[11]  L Mountain,et al.  The influence of trend on estimates of accidents at junctions. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  Dorothy D. Dunlop,et al.  Regression for Longitudinal Data: A Bridge from Least Squares Regression , 1994 .

[13]  S. Zeger,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models , 1986 .

[14]  P. Diggle.  Analysis of Longitudinal Data , 1995 .

[15]  M J Maher,et al.  A comprehensive methodology for the fitting of predictive accident models. , 1996, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  Gwilym M. Jenkins,et al.  Time series analysis, forecasting and control , 1972 .

[17]  R. B. Albin,et al.  Evaluating Median Crossover Likelihoods with Clustered Accident Counts: An Empirical Inquiry Using the Random Effects Negative Binomial Model , 1998 .

[18]  S-P Miaou,et al.  MEASURING THE GOODNESS-OF-FIT OF ACCIDENT PREDICTION MODELS , 1996 .

[19]  Ezra Hauer,et al.  OBSERVATIONAL BEFORE-AFTER STUDIES IN ROAD SAFETY -- ESTIMATING THE EFFECT OF HIGHWAY AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING MEASURES ON ROAD SAFETY , 1997 .

[20]  L Lord,et al.  APPLICATION DE DEUX NOUVELLES METHODES POUR EXAMINER LA RELATION ENTRE LES ACCIDENTS ET LES VARIABLES EXPLICATIVES , 1999 .

[21]  A. Nicholson,et al.  ESTIMATING ACCIDENTS IN A ROAD NETWORK , 1996 .