Magnetoencephalographic Activity Related to Conscious Perception Is Stable within Individuals across Years but Not between Individuals

Studies indicate that conscious perception is related to changes in neural activity within a time window that varies between 130 and 320 msec after stimulus presentation, yet it is not known whether such neural correlates of conscious perception are stable across time. Here, we examined the generalization across time within individuals and across different individuals. We trained classification algorithms to decode conscious perception from neural activity recorded during binocular rivalry using magnetoencephalography (MEG). The classifiers were then used to predict the perception of the same participants during different recording sessions either days or years later as well as between different participants. No drop in decoding accuracy was observed when decoding across years compared with days, whereas a large drop in decoding accuracy was found for between-participant decoding. Furthermore, underlying percept-specific MEG signals remained stable in terms of latency, amplitude, and sources within participants across years, whereas differences were found in all of these domains between individuals. Our findings demonstrate that the neural correlates of conscious perception are stable across years for adults, but differ across individuals. Moreover, the study validates decoding based on MEG data as a method for further studies of correlations between individual differences in perceptual contents and between-participant decoding accuracies.

[1]  Karl J. Friston Ten ironic rules for non-statistical reviewers , 2012, NeuroImage.

[2]  C. Olivia,et al.  Onset rivalry: Brief presentation isolates an early independent phase of perceptual competition. , 2012 .

[3]  David A. Leopold,et al.  Stable perception of visually ambiguous patterns , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  Roger B. H. Tootell,et al.  The advantage of combining MEG and EEG: Comparison to fMRI in focally stimulated visual cortex , 2007, NeuroImage.

[5]  Michael Bach,et al.  Early neural activity in Necker-cube reversal: evidence for low-level processing of a gestalt phenomenon. , 2004, Psychophysiology.

[6]  Anna Weinberg,et al.  Longer term test-retest reliability of error-related brain activity. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[7]  Marc Wildi,et al.  Test–retest reliability of EEG spectra during a working memory task , 2008, NeuroImage.

[8]  B. Oken,et al.  Normal temporal variability of the P100. , 1987, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[9]  Michael Bach,et al.  The Necker cube—an ambiguous figure disambiguated in early visual processing , 2005, Vision Research.

[10]  Victor A. F. Lamme,et al.  GABAA Agonist Reduces Visual Awareness: A Masking–EEG Experiment , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  J. Changeux,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.10 No.5 May 2006 Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: a testable taxonomy , 2022 .

[12]  V. Lamme How neuroscience will change our view on consciousness , 2010, Cognitive neuroscience.

[13]  M Rappaport,et al.  Peak identification in visual evoked potentials. , 1973, Psychophysiology.

[14]  Johannes J. Fahrenfort,et al.  Masking Disrupts Reentrant Processing in Human Visual Cortex , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  Johannes Sarnthein,et al.  High test–retest reliability of checkerboard reversal visual evoked potentials (VEP) over 8 months , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[16]  M. Koivisto,et al.  An ERP study of change detection, change blindness, and visual awareness. , 2003, Psychophysiology.

[17]  M. Kerszberg,et al.  A Neuronal Model of a Global Workspace in Effortful Cognitive Tasks , 2001 .

[18]  T. Gasser,et al.  The intra-individual reproducibility of flash-evoked potentials in a sample of children. , 1987, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[19]  Mika Koivisto,et al.  Event-related brain potential correlates of visual awareness , 2010, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[20]  Marc Wildi,et al.  Test–retest reliability of resting EEG spectra validates a statistical signature of persons , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[21]  Lau M. Andersen,et al.  Using multivariate decoding to go beyond contrastive analyses in consciousness research , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[22]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Timing of the brain events underlying access to consciousness during the attentional blink , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  C. Tallon-Baudry,et al.  Activity in the lateral occipital cortex between 200 and 300 ms distinguishes between physically identical seen and unseen stimuli , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[24]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Neural processes underlying conscious perception: Experimental findings and a global neuronal workspace framework , 2004, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[25]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Bayesian decoding of brain images , 2008, NeuroImage.

[26]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Early Visual Responses Predict Conscious Face Perception within and between Subjects during Binocular Rivalry , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  R. Hari,et al.  Visual awareness of objects correlates with activity of right occipital cortex , 1996, Neuroreport.

[28]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Multiple sparse priors for the M/EEG inverse problem , 2008, NeuroImage.