Evaluation of Work Measurement Concepts for a Cellular Manufacturing Reference Line to Enable Low Cost Automation for Lean Machining

Abstract Cellular Manufacturing has been proven to be an economic, efficient and lean approach bringing flexibility into machining areas. Corresponding solutions use several basic machines that are adapted to the machining task in a right-sized equipment approach. However, the use of basic, low cost machinery providing just necessary functions results in a relatively high manual operation effort. The preferred approach in order to reduce manual work in production is automation. Traditional automation of man-machine systems – especially in western countries – tends to be comprehensive and thus often complex and expensive. A low cost, lean automation intelligently being adapted to the individual task, as well as a decision method for choosing the tasks worth being automated, is required. The first step on the road towards a scientifically sound low cost automation method for a Cellular Manufacturing line is identifying and quantifying the different manual tasks which could potentially be automated. Therefore, this paper starts with investigating existing analytical methods for measuring work. The different measuring concepts have been applied to the Cellular Manufacturing reference line at the Process Learning Factory CiP at TU Darmstadt. An adequate evaluation system considering reality, detail, variation and effort levels has been defined in order to assess the results’ suitability for evaluating manual work in a Cellular Manufacturing line, pointing out potentials and limits of the individual approaches. As the final outcome, a ranking of different work measurement concepts for the Cellular Manufacturing reference line is presented, verifying the applicability of the general approach and serving as a basis for further evaluation of other lines.

[1]  Bruno Lotter Die Primär-Sekundär-Analyse , 2006 .

[2]  Harold Bright Maynard,et al.  Industrial engineering handbook , 1956 .

[3]  Shigeyasu Sakamoto,et al.  Beyond World-Class Productivity , 2010 .

[4]  Taiichi Ohno,et al.  Toyota Production System : Beyond Large-Scale Production , 1988 .

[5]  E. Abele,et al.  Zukunft der Produktion , 2011 .

[6]  David Bennett Technology and operations management , 2006 .

[7]  M Bloom,et al.  Data acquisition , 1986 .

[8]  Sven Bechtloff Identifikation wirtschaftlicher Einsatzgebiete der Sequenzfertigung in der Bohr- und Fräsbearbeitung von Kleinserien , 2014 .

[9]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation , 1990 .

[10]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[11]  勝見 崇巨 多品種中量領域生産におけるLCIA(Low Cost Intelligent Automation)技術 (発刊550号記念特集 ファクトリーオペレーション未来予測) , 1999 .

[12]  Harold Bright Maynard,et al.  Methods-time measurement , 1948 .

[13]  Kjell B. Zandin,et al.  MOST® Work Measurement Systems , 1990 .

[14]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Handbook of industrial engineering , 2001 .

[15]  Joachim Metternich,et al.  Efficiency and Economic Evaluation of Cellular Manufacturing to Enable Lean Machining , 2013 .

[16]  Klaus Schlaich Genauigkeit vorbestimmter manueller Willkürbewegungen bei Montagearbeiten , 1967 .

[17]  REFA-Verband,et al.  Methodenlehre des Arbeitsstudiums , 1971 .

[18]  R. Barnes Motion and time study , 1950 .

[19]  P. Moran On the method of paired comparisons. , 1947, Biometrika.

[20]  Walther Poppelreuter Zeitstudie und Betriebsüberwachung im Arbeitsschaubild , 1929 .

[21]  Bengt Klefsjö,et al.  The machine that changed the world , 2008 .

[22]  John B. Kidd,et al.  Toyota Production System , 1993 .

[23]  Kurt Landau,et al.  Produktivitätsmanagement von Arbeitssystemen , 2006 .

[24]  Malcolm,et al.  Work-Factor Time Standards Measurement Of Manual And Mental Work , 1962 .

[25]  Aura C. Matias Work Measurement: Principles and Techniques , 2007 .