Biofilm formation in Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough is dependent upon protein filaments.

Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough is a Gram-negative sulfate-reducing bacterium (SRB), and the physiology of SRBs can impact many anaerobic environments including radionuclide waste sites, oil reservoirs and metal pipelines. In an attempt to understand D. vulgaris as a population that can adhere to surfaces, D. vulgaris cultures were grown in a defined medium and analysed for carbohydrate production, motility and biofilm formation. Desulfovibrio vulgaris wild-type cells had increasing amounts of carbohydrate into stationary phase and approximately half of the carbohydrate remained internal. In comparison, a mutant that lacked the 200 kb megaplasmid, strain DeltaMP, produced less carbohydrate and the majority of carbohydrate remained internal of the cell proper. To assess the possibility of carbohydrate re-allocation, biofilm formation was investigated. Wild-type cells produced approximately threefold more biofilm on glass slides compared with DeltaMP; however, wild-type biofilm did not contain significant levels of exopolysaccharide. In addition, stains specific for extracellular carbohydrate did not reveal polysaccharide material within the biofilm. Desulfovibrio vulgaris wild-type biofilms contained long filaments as observed with scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and the biofilm-deficient DeltaMP strain was also deficient in motility. Biofilms grown directly on silica oxide transmission electron microscopy (TEM) grids did not contain significant levels of an exopolysaccharide matrix when viewed with TEM and SEM, and samples stained with ammonium molybdate also showed long filaments that resembled flagella. Biofilms subjected to protease treatments were degraded, and different proteases that were added at the time of inoculation inhibited biofilm formation. The data indicated that D. vulgaris did not produce an extensive exopolysaccharide matrix, used protein filaments to form biofilm between cells and silica oxide surfaces, and the filaments appeared to be flagella. It is likely that D. vulgaris used flagella for more than a means of locomotion to a surface, but also used flagella, or modified flagella, to establish and/or maintain biofilm structure.

[1]  H. Liu,et al.  Specification of sulfate reducing bacteria biofilms accumulation effects on corrosion initiation , 2007 .

[2]  R. Wirth,et al.  Flagella of Pyrococcus furiosus: Multifunctional Organelles, Made for Swimming, Adhesion to Various Surfaces, and Cell-Cell Contacts , 2006, Journal of bacteriology.

[3]  Rajbir Singh,et al.  Biofilms: implications in bioremediation. , 2006, Trends in microbiology.

[4]  D. Cantero,et al.  Toxic effects of dissolved heavy metals on Desulfovibrio vulgaris and Desulfovibrio sp. strains. , 2006, Journal of hazardous materials.

[5]  John Kelly,et al.  Proteomic Analysis of Campylobacter jejuni 11168 Biofilms Reveals a Role for the Motility Complex in Biofilm Formation , 2006, Journal of bacteriology.

[6]  F. Ramírez,et al.  Characterization of bacterial community associated to biofilms of corroded oil pipelines from the southeast of Mexico. , 2006, Anaerobe.

[7]  T. Wood,et al.  Motility influences biofilm architecture in Escherichia coli , 2006, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[8]  M. Bruschi,et al.  Cr(VI) detoxification by Desulfovibrio vulgaris strain Hildenborough: microbe–metal interactions studies , 2005, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[9]  Kelly J. Wright,et al.  Uropathogenic Escherichia coli Flagella Aid in Efficient Urinary Tract Colonization , 2005, Infection and Immunity.

[10]  Katherine H. Huang,et al.  Temporal Transcriptomic Analysis as Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough Transitions into Stationary Phase during Electron Donor Depletion , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[11]  A. Filloux,et al.  The pel genes of the Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAK strain are involved at early and late stages of biofilm formation. , 2005, Microbiology.

[12]  Lian-Hui Zhang,et al.  MorA Defines a New Class of Regulators Affecting Flagellar Development and Biofilm Formation in Diverse Pseudomonas Species , 2004, Journal of bacteriology.

[13]  G. Geesey,et al.  Combining in Situ Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Optical Microscopy, and X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy to Investigate Mineral Surface-Associated Microbial Activities , 2004, Microbial Ecology.

[14]  Z. Lewandowski,et al.  Dynamics of lead immobilization in sulfate reducing biofilms. , 2004, Water research.

[15]  Jan Sunner,et al.  Biocorrosion: towards understanding interactions between biofilms and metals. , 2004, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[16]  Rekha Seshadri,et al.  The genome sequence of the anaerobic, sulfate-reducing bacterium Desulfovibrio vulgaris Hildenborough , 2004, Nature Biotechnology.

[17]  S. Le Borgne,et al.  Phylogenetic characterization of a corrosive consortium isolated from a sour gas pipeline , 2004, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[18]  S. M. Kirov,et al.  Aeromonas Flagella (Polar and Lateral) Are Enterocyte Adhesins That Contribute to Biofilm Formation on Surfaces , 2004, Infection and Immunity.

[19]  J. Banfield,et al.  Sulfate-Reducing Bacteria-Dominated Biofilms That Precipitate ZnS in a Subsurface Circumneutral-pH Mine Drainage System , 2004, Microbial Ecology.

[20]  Geoffrey M. Gadd,et al.  Linked Redox Precipitation of Sulfur and Selenium under Anaerobic Conditions by Sulfate-Reducing Bacterial Biofilms , 2003, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[21]  R. Harshey,et al.  Bacterial motility on a surface: many ways to a common goal. , 2003, Annual review of microbiology.

[22]  J. Kilbane,et al.  Characterization of Microbial Communities in Gas Industry Pipelines , 2003, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[23]  J. Lloyd Microbial reduction of metals and radionuclides. , 2003, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[24]  S. Molin,et al.  Biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa wild type, flagella and type IV pili mutants , 2003, Molecular microbiology.

[25]  P Stoodley,et al.  The influence of fluid shear on the structure and material properties of sulphate-reducing bacterial biofilms , 2002, Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[26]  M. Bruschi,et al.  Bioremediation of chromate: thermodynamic analysis of the effects of Cr(VI) on sulfate-reducing bacteria , 2002, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[27]  M. Martinez,et al.  Characterization of Flagella Produced by Clinical Strains of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia , 2002, Emerging infectious diseases.

[28]  A. Torres,et al.  The flagella of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli mediate adherence to epithelial cells , 2002, Molecular microbiology.

[29]  A. Zehnder,et al.  The Global Regulatory hns Gene Negatively Affects Adhesion to Solid Surfaces by Anaerobically Grown Escherichia coli by Modulating Expression of Flagellar Genes and Lipopolysaccharide Production , 2002, Journal of bacteriology.

[30]  Kwong‐Yu Chan,et al.  Anaerobic electrochemical corrosion of mild steel in the presence of extracellular polymeric substances produced by a culture enriched in sulfate-reducing bacteria. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[31]  J. Costerton,et al.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa Displays Multiple Phenotypes during Development as a Biofilm , 2002, Journal of bacteriology.

[32]  I. Sutherland,et al.  The biofilm matrix--an immobilized but dynamic microbial environment. , 2001, Trends in microbiology.

[33]  R. Kolter,et al.  The outer membrane protein, Antigen 43, mediates cell‐to‐cell interactions within Escherichia coli biofilms , 2000, Molecular microbiology.

[34]  W. Waites,et al.  Effect of Flagella on Initial Attachment of Listeria monocytogenes to Stainless Steel , 2000, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[35]  R. Kolter,et al.  Flagellar and twitching motility are necessary for Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development , 1998, Molecular microbiology.

[36]  R. Kolter,et al.  Genetic analysis of Escherichia coli biofilm formation: roles of flagella, motility, chemotaxis and type I pili , 1998, Molecular microbiology.

[37]  T. Ferdelman,et al.  Structural and Functional Dynamics of Sulfate-Reducing Populations in Bacterial Biofilms , 1998, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[38]  Derek R. Lovley,et al.  Reduction of Chromate by Desulfovibrio vulgaris and Its c3 Cytochrome , 1994, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[39]  D. Lovley,et al.  Reduction of uranium by cytochrome c3 of Desulfovibrio vulgaris , 1993, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[40]  Oliver H. Lowry,et al.  Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. , 1951, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[41]  R. Kolter Surfacing views of biofilm biology. , 2005, Trends in microbiology.

[42]  Roberto Kolter,et al.  Biofilms: the matrix revisited. , 2005, Trends in microbiology.

[43]  R. Kolter,et al.  Biofilm formation as microbial development. , 2000, Annual review of microbiology.

[44]  P. Bishop,et al.  Comparison of extraction methods for quantifying extracellular polymers in biofilms , 1999 .

[45]  I. Beech,et al.  Interactions of exopolymers produced by sulphate-reducing bacteria with metal ions , 1995 .