Assessing Project Delivery for Sustainable, High-Performance Buildings Through Mixed Methods

Project delivery processes that describe contractual agreements among project participants, timing their activities and levels of involvement have long been subjects for construction management research. Dominated by quantitative methods, this research topic requires large sample sizes mainly due to the extensive number of potential variables arising from the project-based nature of construction. The recent and growing trend in the industry towards sustainable and high-performance building construction introduces added complexities in the project delivery process and challenges research due to the limited population of completed environmentally sustainable buildings. This study presents a combined use of quantitative and qualitative methods, also called mixed methods, as a useful way to respond to the research challenges. This research first quantitatively selects important variables of project delivery from a sample of sustainable, high-performance office buildings (N = 40) and then tests those variables with the analyses of selected case studies. The results of this exploratory study are important to expanding research in the delivery of sustainable and high-performance building projects and the methods required to expand the understanding, validity and reliability of this research.

[1]  Michael J. Horman,et al.  Key Processes in the Building Delivery of Green Hospitals , 2009 .

[2]  Liang Y Liu,et al.  Relationship between Project Interaction and Performance Indicators , 1996 .

[3]  David R. Riley,et al.  Lean Processes for Sustainable Project Delivery , 2006 .

[4]  David R. Riley,et al.  SUSTAINABLE METRICS : A DESIGN PROCESS MODEL FOR HIGH PERFORMANCE BUILDINGS , 2004 .

[5]  Robert F. Testa,et al.  Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application , 1979 .

[6]  Michael Pulaski The Alignment of Sustainability and Constructability: A Continuous Value Enhancement Process , 2005 .

[7]  Keith R. Molenaar,et al.  PUBLIC-SECTOR DESIGN/BUILD EVOLUTION AND PERFORMANCE , 1999 .

[8]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[9]  Elliot B. Gordon,et al.  Integrated design and building process: what research and methodologies are needed? , 2000 .

[10]  Sinem Korkmaz,et al.  PILOTING EVALUATION METRICS FOR HIGH PERFORMANCE GREEN BUILDING PROJECT DELIVERY , 2007 .

[11]  Leidy E. Klotz,et al.  Process transparency for sustainable building delivery , 2009 .

[12]  David R. Riley,et al.  Key attributes of a longitudinal study of green project delivery , 2009 .

[13]  Harvey Meyer,et al.  THE GREENING OF CORPORATE AMERICA , 2000 .

[14]  C. William Ibbs,et al.  Project delivery systems and project change: Quantitative analysis , 2003 .

[15]  David R. Riley,et al.  Piloting Evaluation Metrics for Sustainable High-Performance Building Project Delivery , 2010 .

[16]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[17]  John E. Taylor,et al.  CONSTRUCTING RESEARCH WITH CASE STUDIES , 2009 .

[18]  G. Edward Gibson,et al.  Empirical Comparison of Design/Build and Design/Bid/Build Project Delivery Methods , 2009 .

[19]  Yupeng Luo,et al.  Delivering green buildings: Process improvements for sustainable construction , 2006 .

[20]  John Messner,et al.  Comparing procurement methods for design-build projects , 2006 .

[21]  Mark Konchar,et al.  Comparison of U.S. Project Delivery Systems , 1998 .

[22]  Leidy E. Klotz,et al.  A Design Process Evaluation Method for Sustainable Buildings , 2009 .

[23]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[24]  Salwa Mamoun Beheiry,et al.  Examining the Business Impact of Owner Commitment to Sustainability , 2006 .