Imaging based metrics for performance assessment in laser phonomicrosurgery

State-of-the-art laser phonomicrosurgery (LP) used for the treatment of laryngeal abnormalities involves complex otolaryngological surgical techniques. It relies heavily on surgeon dexterity, requiring significant psychomotor skills. Equipment scale and size, laser operative distance, and the anatomically small nature of the vocal folds all combine to compound the surgical challenges. An objective measurement is therefore necessary to understand the impact of equipment design, its usability, surgeon skill, and learning, on performing LP effectively. This paper introduces imaging based feature extraction as a method to establish metrics to assess surgical performance in LP. Experimental analysis demonstrates the utility of these metrics in measuring surgical task execution vis-à-vis the task objectives. The metrics also provide for a combined rating scale giving a robust quantitative classification of the levels of surgical performance.

[1]  Dominiek Reynaerts,et al.  Evaluation of an intuitive writing interface in robot-aided laser laparoscopic surgery , 2006, Computer aided surgery : official journal of the International Society for Computer Aided Surgery.

[2]  R. Reznick,et al.  Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents , 1997, The British journal of surgery.

[3]  Darwin G. Caldwell,et al.  Next-generation micromanipulator for computer-assisted laser phonomicrosurgery , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[4]  Morgan Quigley,et al.  ROS: an open-source Robot Operating System , 2009, ICRA 2009.

[5]  D Oleynikov,et al.  Robotic surgery training and performance: identifying objective variables for quantifying the extent of proficiency. , 2006, Surgical endoscopy.

[6]  M. Remacle,et al.  Current State of Scanning Micromanipulator Applications with the Carbon Dioxide Laser , 2008, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[7]  M. Strome,et al.  Transoral Robot‐Assisted CO2 Laser Supraglottic Laryngectomy: Experimental and Clinical Data , 2007, The Laryngoscope.

[8]  Giulio Dagnino,et al.  A virtual scalpel system for computer-assisted laser microsurgery , 2011, 2011 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[9]  D. Hershberger,et al.  The surgical system , 2001 .

[10]  Michael T. Orchard,et al.  A fast direct Fourier-based algorithm for subpixel registration of images , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[11]  E. Genden,et al.  Transoral Robotic Surgery Using a Carbon Dioxide Flexible Laser for Tumors of the Upper Aerodigestive Tract , 2008, The Laryngoscope.

[12]  Henry C. Lin,et al.  Review of methods for objective surgical skill evaluation , 2011, Surgical Endoscopy.

[13]  Brandon Burr,et al.  VACA: a tool for qualitative video analysis , 2006, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[14]  J. B. Brooke,et al.  SUS: A 'Quick and Dirty' Usability Scale , 1996 .

[15]  Rangachar Kasturi,et al.  Machine vision , 1995 .

[16]  Dominique L. Scapin,et al.  Evaluating a user interface with ergonomic criteria , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[17]  A. Darzi,et al.  Qualitative and quantitative analysis of the learning curve of a simulated surgical task on the da Vinci system , 2004, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[18]  Ming-Kuei Hu,et al.  Visual pattern recognition by moment invariants , 1962, IRE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[19]  Ulrich Matern,et al.  Safety, hazards and ergonomics in the operating room , 2007, Surgical Endoscopy.

[20]  Giulio Dagnino,et al.  New software tools for enhanced precision in robot-assisted laser phonomicrosurgery , 2012, 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.