Development and Benchmarking of Multivariate Statistical Process Control Tools for a Semiconductor ETCH Process: Impact of Measurement Selection and Data Treatment on Sensitivity

Abstract Multivariate Statistical Process Control (MSPC) tools have been developed for monitoring a Lam 9600 TCP Metal Etcher at Texas Instruments. These tools are used to determine if the etch process is operating normally or if a system fault has occurred. Application of these methods is complicated because the etch process data exhibits a large amount of normal systematic variation. Variations due to faults of process concern can be relatively minor in comparison. The Lam 9600 used in this study is equipped with several sensor systems including engineering variables (e.g. pressure, gas flow rates and power), spatially resolved Optical Emission Spectroscopy (OES) of the plasma and a Radio Frequency Monitoring (RFM) system to monitor the power and phase relationships of the plasma generator. A variety of analysis methods and data preprocessing techniques have been tested for their sensitivity to specific system faults. These methods have been applied to data from each of the sensor systems separately and in combination. The performance of the methods on a set of benchmark fault detection problems will be presented and the strengths and weaknesses of the methods will be discussed, along with the relative advantages of each of the sensor systems.

[1]  S. Wold,et al.  Multi‐way principal components‐and PLS‐analysis , 1987 .

[2]  J. Edward Jackson,et al.  A User's Guide to Principal Components. , 1991 .

[3]  G. Dunteman.  Principal Components Analysis , 1989 .

[4]  J. A. López del Val,et al.  Principal Components Analysis , 2018, Applied Univariate, Bivariate, and Multivariate Statistics Using Python.

[5]  B. Kowalski,et al.  Tensorial resolution: A direct trilinear decomposition , 1990 .

[6]  J.F. MacGregor,et al.  Multi-way PCA applied to an industrial batch process , 1994, Proceedings of 1994 American Control Conference - ACC '94.

[7]  Barry M. Wise,et al.  Application of multi-way principal components analysis to nuclear waste storage tank monitoring , 1996 .

[8]  Barry M. Wise,et al.  A Theoretical Basis for the use of Principal Component Models for Monitoring Multivariate Processes , 1990 .

[9]  Paul Geladi,et al.  Principal Component Analysis , 1987, Comprehensive Chemometrics.

[10]  J. Macgregor,et al.  Monitoring batch processes using multiway principal component analysis , 1994 .

[11]  Age K. Smilde,et al.  Three‐way methods for the calibration of chromatographic systems: Comparing PARAFAC and three‐way PLS , 1991 .

[12]  Barry M. Wise,et al.  The process chemometrics approach to process monitoring and fault detection , 1995 .

[13]  Paul Geladi,et al.  Analysis of multi-way (multi-mode) data , 1989 .

[14]  Thomas E. Marlin,et al.  Multivariate statistical monitoring of process operating performance , 1991 .

[15]  Barry M. Wise,et al.  Development and Benchmarking of Multivariate Statistical Process Control Tools for a Semiconductor Etch Process: Improving Robustness through Model Updating , 1997 .

[16]  B. Kowalski,et al.  Theory of medium‐rank second‐order calibration with restricted‐Tucker models , 1994 .

[17]  John F. MacGregor,et al.  Multivariate SPC charts for monitoring batch processes , 1995 .