Engineering streptococcal protein G for increased alkaline stability.

Most protein-based affinity chromatography media are very sensitive towards alkaline treatment, which is a preferred method for regeneration and removal of contaminants from the purification devices in industrial applications. In a previous study, we concluded that a simple and straightforward strategy consisting of replacing asparagine residues could improve the stability towards alkaline conditions. In this study, we have shown the potential of this rationale by stabilizing an IgG-binding domain of streptococcal protein G, i.e. the C2 domain. In order to analyze the contribution of the different amino acids to the alkaline sensitivity of the domain we used a single point mutation strategy. Amino acids known to be susceptible towards high pH, asparagine and glutamine, were substituted for less-alkali-susceptible residues. In addition, aspartic acid residues were mutated to evaluate if the stability could be further increased. The stability of the different C2 variants was subsequently analyzed by exposing them to NaOH. The obtained results reveal that the most sensitive amino acid towards alkaline conditions in the structure of C2 is Asn36. The double mutant, C2(N7,36A), was found to be the most stable mutant constructed. In addition to the increased alkaline stability and also very important for potential use as an affinity ligand, this mutated variant also retains the secondary structure, as well as the affinity to the Fc fragment of IgG.

[1]  C. A. Thomas,et al.  Molecular cloning. , 1977, Advances in pathobiology.

[2]  T. Atkinson,et al.  The secondary structure of protein G', a robust molecule. , 1991, The Biochemical journal.

[3]  G. Fassina,et al.  Protein a mimetic peptide ligand for affinity purification of antibodies , 1996, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[4]  R. Schowen,et al.  Secondary structure and protein deamidation. , 1999, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[5]  Michael C. Flickinger,et al.  Encyclopedia of bioprocess technology : fermentation, biocatalysis, and bioseparation , 1999 .

[6]  D. Wigley,et al.  The third IgG-binding domain from streptococcal protein G. An analysis by X-ray crystallography of the structure alone and in a complex with Fab. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  H W Hellinga,et al.  Dissection of the protein G B1 domain binding site for human IgG Fc fragment , 1999, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[8]  M. Uhlén,et al.  Protein engineering of an IgG-binding domain allows milder elution conditions during affinity chromatography. , 2000, Journal of biotechnology.

[9]  A. Fersht,et al.  Alpha-helix stability in proteins. II. Factors that influence stability at an internal position. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  M. Uhlén,et al.  Stability towards alkaline conditions can be engineered into a protein ligand. , 2000, Journal of biotechnology.

[11]  R. Saiki,et al.  A general method of in vitro preparation and specific mutagenesis of DNA fragments: study of protein and DNA interactions. , 1988, Nucleic acids research.

[12]  V. Schirch,et al.  Role of peptide conformation in the rate and mechanism of deamidation of asparaginyl residues. , 1988, Biochemistry.

[13]  F. Sanger,et al.  DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors. , 1977, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  C. Glatz,et al.  Fusion tails for the recovery and purification of recombinant proteins. , 1991, Protein expression and purification.

[15]  A. B. Robinson,et al.  Distribution of glutamine and asparagine residues and their near neighbors in peptides and proteins. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  C. Lowe,et al.  Design, synthesis, and application of a Protein A mimetic , 1998, Nature Biotechnology.

[17]  G L Gilliland,et al.  Two crystal structures of the B1 immunoglobulin-binding domain of streptococcal protein G and comparison with NMR. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[18]  D. Raleigh,et al.  Thermodynamic genetics of the folding of the B1 immunoglobulin‐binding domain from streptococcal protein G , 1995, Proteins.

[19]  L. Isaksson,et al.  Analysis of rpsD mutations in Escherichia coli. I. Comparison of mutants with various alterations in ribosomal protein S4. , 1979, Molecular & general genetics : MGG.

[20]  G. Montelione,et al.  High-level production of uniformly 15N-and 13C-enriched fusion proteins in Escherichia coli , 1996 .

[21]  M. Sutcliffe,et al.  Determination of the solution structures of domains II and III of protein G from Streptococcus by 1H nuclear magnetic resonance. , 1992, Journal of Molecular Biology.

[22]  R A Sayle,et al.  RASMOL: biomolecular graphics for all. , 1995, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[23]  D. Wetlaufer Protein structure. , 1986, Science.

[24]  D. Urry,et al.  Nonenzymatic deamidation of asparaginyl and glutaminyl residues in proteins. , 1991, Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology.

[25]  S. Hober,et al.  Charge engineering of a protein domain to allow efficient ion-exchange recovery. , 2000, Protein engineering.

[26]  C. Pace,et al.  Helix propensities are identical in proteins and peptides. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[27]  F. Young Biochemistry , 1955, The Indian Medical Gazette.

[28]  A. Kossiakoff,et al.  Tertiary structure is a principal determinant to protein deamidation. , 1988, Science.

[29]  G. Marius Clore,et al.  Improving the Packing and Accuracy of NMR Structures with a Pseudopotential for the Radius of Gyration , 1999 .

[30]  A. Gronenborn,et al.  A novel, highly stable fold of the immunoglobulin binding domain of streptococcal protein G. , 1993, Science.

[31]  N. Robinson,et al.  Molecular clocks. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  M. Saraste,et al.  FEBS Lett , 2000 .

[33]  P. Alexander,et al.  Kinetic analysis of folding and unfolding the 56 amino acid IgG-binding domain of streptococcal protein G. , 1992, Biochemistry.

[34]  Stabilization of lysozyme against irreversible inactivation by alterations of the Asp-Gly sequences. , 1995, Protein engineering.

[35]  W C Johnson,et al.  Protein secondary structure and circular dichroism: A practical guide , 1990, Proteins.

[36]  L. Jendeberg,et al.  The serum albumin‐binding domain of streptococcal protein G is a three‐helical bundle: a heteronuclear NMR study , 1996, FEBS letters.

[37]  B Guss,et al.  Structure and evolution of the repetitive gene encoding streptococcal protein G. , 1987, European journal of biochemistry.

[38]  P. Alexander,et al.  Thermodynamic analysis of the folding of the streptococcal protein G IgG-binding domains B1 and B2: why small proteins tend to have high denaturation temperatures. , 1992, Biochemistry.

[39]  B. Johansson,et al.  Development of a cleaning in place protocol and repetitive application of Escherichia coli homogenate on STREAMLINE™ Q XL , 2000 .

[40]  T. Creighton,et al.  Effect of protein conformation on rate of deamidation: Ribonuclease A , 1989, Proteins.

[41]  A M Gronenborn,et al.  1.67-A X-ray structure of the B2 immunoglobulin-binding domain of streptococcal protein G and comparison to the NMR structure of the B1 domain. , 1992, Biochemistry.

[42]  P. V. von Hippel,et al.  Calculation of protein extinction coefficients from amino acid sequence data. , 1989, Analytical biochemistry.

[43]  D. Brems,et al.  The effects of alpha‐helix on the stability of Asn residues: Deamidation rates in peptides of varying helicity , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[44]  R. Borchardt,et al.  Reactivity toward deamidation of asparagine residues in beta-turn structures. , 2000, The journal of peptide research : official journal of the American Peptide Society.

[45]  M. Uhlén,et al.  Analysis and use of the serum albumin binding domains of streptococcal protein G , 1988, Journal of molecular recognition : JMR.

[46]  D. Wigley,et al.  Crystal structure of a streptococcal protein G domain bound to an Fab fragment , 1992, Nature.