Trauma registries. Current status and future prospects.

Hospital trauma registries are evolving rapidly as a result of a renewed focus on trauma care evaluation and recent advances in microcomputer technology. In theory, trauma registries can serve as the principal tool for the systematic audit of the quality of patient care provided by a hospital or a trauma system and as a potential source of part of the data needed for injury surveillance. In practice, however, there is a tendency to underestimate the resources needed to initiate and maintain a registry. Herein, we describe the purposes, resource requirements, and limitations of trauma registries. We conclude that standardization of case criteria, core data content, data definitions, and coding conventions can enhance the utility of trauma registries.

[1]  Americancollegeofemergencyphy Guidelines for trauma care systems , 1987 .

[2]  F. Lewis,et al.  Regional trauma system design: critical concepts. , 1987, American journal of surgery.

[3]  T. Colton,et al.  Measurement of cancer incidence in the United States: sources and uses of data. , 1982, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[4]  H. Gelfand,et al.  An Evaluation of the Illinois Trauma Registry: The Completeness of Case Reporting , 1980, Medical care.

[5]  D. Trunkey,et al.  Trauma Systems: Current Status—Future Challenges , 1988 .

[6]  J Goldberg,et al.  Registry evaluation methods: a review and case study. , 1980, Epidemiologic reviews.

[7]  J. G. West,et al.  A method for evaluating field triage criteria. , 1986, The Journal of trauma.

[8]  F. Mosteller Assessing quality of institutional care. , 1987, American journal of public health.

[9]  H. Latourette,et al.  A national cooperative program for the evaluation of end results in cancer. , 1959, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[10]  D. O'leary The Joint Commission looks to the future. , 1987, JAMA.

[11]  P. London Injury in America. A continuing public health problem , 1986 .

[12]  J M Weddell,et al.  Registers and registries: a review. , 1973, International journal of epidemiology.

[13]  H A F Dudley,et al.  Development of a Microcomputer-Based System for Surgical Audit and Patient Administration: A Review , 1987, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[14]  M. Beachley,et al.  Developing trauma care systems: the trauma nurse coordinator. , 1988, The Journal of nursing administration.

[15]  M. Castle Hospital infection control: Principles and practice , 1982 .

[16]  Resource teams: their structure and use. , 1988, The Journal of nursing administration.

[17]  J. Bailar,et al.  Progress against cancer? , 1986, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  W. Haenszel The United States Network of Cancer Registries , 1975 .

[19]  Stroke data banks. , 1987, Stroke.

[20]  D. Andrulis,et al.  Assessing medical technologies. , 1978, Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine.

[21]  W. Roper,et al.  Effectiveness in Health Care , 1988 .

[22]  S. Shackford,et al.  Assuring quality in a trauma system--the Medical Audit Committee: composition, cost, and results. , 1987, The Journal of trauma.

[23]  S. Schroeder Outcome assessment 70 years later: are we ready? , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  H. Champion,et al.  Trauma care systems: the federal role. , 1988, The Journal of trauma.

[25]  W. Baxt,et al.  The failure of prehospital trauma prediction rules to classify trauma patients accurately. , 1989, Annals of emergency medicine.

[26]  C. B. Flint The role of the trauma coordinator: a position paper. , 1988, The Journal of trauma.

[27]  R J Lowe,et al.  Trauma registry. New computer method for multifactorial evaluation of a major health problem. , 1973, JAMA.