Impact of gender in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device therapy in end-stage heart failure

Background: There is an ongoing debate about the influence of the female gender on postoperative outcomes after durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Despite the differences in pathophysiology of heart failure in females, therapy concepts are the same as in the male population. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of the female gender in surgical heart failure therapy. Materials and methods: Between August 2010 and January 2020, 207 patients were treated with durable LVAD at out institution. We matched 111 patients in two groups to compare the outcomes in male and female patients and to stratify the risk factors of mortality. Results: The groups were matched 2:1 and were comparable after matching. We found no difference in in-hospital and follow-up mortality between male and female patients. Postoperative adverse events and complications were found to be unvaried across male and female patients. Female patients had higher rates of postoperative LVAD-thrombosis compared to their male counterparts (13.5% vs 0, p = 0.001) and the rates of renal replacement therapy lasting over 90 days were also higher in the female group (33.8% vs 56.8%, p = 0.021). Furthermore, the female gender was not an independent predictor neither of in-hospital nor follow-up mortality. Conclusions: Durable continuous flow left ventricular assist devices as a bridge to transplantation or recovery in female patients are associated with a higher risk of acute kidney injury requiring RRT and are at a higher risk of LVAD-thrombosis. Nevertheless, survival rates between genders are similar.

[1]  Y. Ko,et al.  Gender Differences in Mortality After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implant: A Causal Mediation Analysis Approach. , 2020, ASAIO journal.

[2]  H. Lamba,et al.  Chronic Kidney Disease and Acute Kidney Injury Outcomes Post Left Ventricular Assist Device Implant , 2020, Cureus.

[3]  N. Desai,et al.  SEX DIFFERENCES IN PATIENTS RECEIVING LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICES FOR END STAGE HEART FAILURE , 2020 .

[4]  J. Tijssen,et al.  Causes and predictors of early mortality in patients treated with left ventricular assist device implantation in the European Registry of Mechanical Circulatory Support (EUROMACS) , 2020, Intensive Care Medicine.

[5]  Francesca N. Delling,et al.  Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2020 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association , 2020, Circulation.

[6]  A. Briasoulis,et al.  Gender Differences in Outcomes after Implantation of Left Ventricular Assist Devices. , 2020, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[7]  Maheshwari Patel,et al.  Study , 2019, Definitions.

[8]  O. Wever-Pinzon,et al.  Sex Differences in the Risk of Pump Thrombosis in Patients Supported with Left Ventricular Assist Devices , 2018 .

[9]  Stefan Blankenberg,et al.  Gender differences and outcomes in left ventricular assist device support: The European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support. , 2018, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[10]  S. Kelsey,et al.  Ten-Year Mortality in the WISE Study (Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation) , 2017, Circulation. Cardiovascular quality and outcomes.

[11]  J. Kirklin,et al.  Does Small Size Matter With Continuous Flow Devices?: Analysis of the INTERMACS Database of Adults With BSA ≤1.5 m2. , 2017, JACC. Heart failure.

[12]  J. Lindenfeld,et al.  Sex differences and in-hospital outcomes in patients undergoing mechanical circulatory support implantation. , 2017, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[13]  C. Caldeira,et al.  Incidence and Risk Factor Analysis for Gastrointestinal Bleeding and Pump Thrombosis in Left Ventricular Assist Device Recipients. , 2015, Artificial organs.

[14]  N. de Jonge,et al.  Left ventricular assist devices: a kidney’s perspective , 2015, Heart Failure Reviews.

[15]  F. de Robertis,et al.  Gender differences in continuous-flow left ventricular assist device therapy as a bridge to transplantation: a risk-adjusted comparison using a propensity score-matching analysis. , 2015, Artificial organs.

[16]  Anne L. Taylor Heart Failure in Women , 2015, Current Heart Failure Reports.

[17]  Karen Ulisney,et al.  INTERMACS profiles of advanced heart failure: the current picture. , 2009, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[18]  P. Okin,et al.  Gender Differences in Left Ventricular Structure and Function During Antihypertensive Treatment: The Losartan Intervention for Endpoint Reduction in Hypertension Study , 2008, Hypertension.

[19]  C. Almond,et al.  Pediatric Ventricular Assist Devices , 2007, Pediatric Cardiology.

[20]  B. Yawn,et al.  Trends in heart failure incidence and survival in a community-based population. , 2004, JAMA.

[21]  M. Oz,et al.  Effect of gender on bridging to transplantation and posttransplantation survival in patients with left ventricular assist devices. , 2004, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[22]  J. Steiner,et al.  Gender, age, and heart failure with preserved left ventricular systolic function. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[23]  Daniel Levy,et al.  Long-term trends in the incidence of and survival with heart failure. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  J. McMurray,et al.  Failure of women's hearts. , 1999, Circulation.

[25]  R M Lang,et al.  Sex‐Associated Differences in Left Ventricular Function in Aortic Stenosis of the Elderly , 1992, Circulation.

[26]  M. Pfeffer,et al.  Sex differences in the management of coronary artery disease. Survival and Ventricular Enlargement Investigators. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.