Simulated motion enhances neuronal selectivity for a sound localization cue in background noise

In nature, sound sources move and signals are accompanied by background noise. Noting that motion helps the perception of visual stimuli, we tested whether motion similarly facilitates the detection of acoustic targets, at the neuronal level. Auditory neurons in the central nucleus of the barn owl's inferior colliculus (ICc), due to their selectivity for interaural phase difference (delta phi), are sharply tuned to the azimuth of sound sources and are arrayed to form a topographic map of delta phi. While recording from single ICc neurons, we presented tones that simulated either moving or stationary sound sources with and without background noise. We found that the tuning of cells in the ICc for delta phi was sharper for stimuli that simulated motion than for those that simulated stationary targets. The neurons signaled the presence of a tone obscured by noise better if the tone moved than if the tone remained stationary. The resistance to noise observed with moving stimuli could not be reproduced with the temporal modulation of the stimulus amplitude, suggesting that a change of position over time was required.

[1]  I. Fujita,et al.  The role of GABAergic inhibition in processing of interaural time difference in the owl's auditory system , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[2]  A Moiseff,et al.  Response of auditory units in the barn owl's inferior colliculus to continuously varying interaural phase differences. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  S Kuwada,et al.  Binaural interaction in low-frequency neurons in inferior colliculus of the cat. I. Effects of long interaural delays, intensity, and repetition rate on interaural delay function. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  S Kuwada,et al.  Response of cat inferior colliculus neurons to binaural beat stimuli: possible mechanisms for sound localization. , 1979, Science.

[5]  S. M. Axstis PHI MOVEMENT AS A SUBTRACTION PROCESS , 1970 .

[6]  M W Spitzer,et al.  Interaural phase coding in auditory midbrain: influence of dynamic stimulus features. , 1991, Science.

[7]  M. Konishi,et al.  Projections of nucleus angularis and nucleus laminaris to the lateral lemniscal nuclear complex of the barn owl , 1988, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[8]  J. A. Altman,et al.  Are there neurons detecting direction of sound source motion? , 1968, Experimental neurology.

[9]  R A Reale,et al.  Auditory cortical neurons are sensitive to static and continuously changing interaural phase cues. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  E. Boring Sensation and Perception. (Scientific Books: Sensation and Perception in the History of Experimental Psychology) , 1943 .

[11]  The effect of interaural signal-frequency disparity on signal detectability. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  O. Braddick A short-range process in apparent motion. , 1974, Vision research.

[13]  T. Yin,et al.  Binaural interaction in low-frequency neurons in inferior colliculus of the cat. II. Effects of changing rate and direction of interaural phase. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  M. Konishi,et al.  Neuronal and behavioral sensitivity to binaural time differences in the owl , 1981, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[15]  M. Konishi,et al.  Calcium binding protein-like immunoreactivity labels the terminal field of nucleus laminaris of the barn owl , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[16]  J. Greenwood,et al.  Modifications of the Rayleigh Test for Uniformity in Analysis of Two-Dimensional Orientation Data , 1958, The Journal of Geology.

[17]  J. Goldberg,et al.  Response of binaural neurons of dog superior olivary complex to dichotic tonal stimuli: some physiological mechanisms of sound localization. , 1969, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  H. Wagner,et al.  Representation of interaural time difference in the central nucleus of the barn owl's inferior colliculus , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[19]  Sokal Rr,et al.  Biometry: the principles and practice of statistics in biological research 2nd edition. , 1981 .

[20]  M. Ahissar,et al.  Encoding of sound-source location and movement: activity of single neurons and interactions between adjacent neurons in the monkey auditory cortex. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  T T Takahashi,et al.  Projections of the cochlear nuclei and nucleus laminaris to the inferior colliculus of the barn owl , 1988, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[22]  M. Konishi,et al.  Segregation of stimulus phase and intensity coding in the cochlear nucleus of the barn owl , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[23]  F. James Rohlf,et al.  Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research , 1969 .

[24]  M. Konishi,et al.  Space and frequency are represented separately in auditory midbrain of the owl. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  Bruce H. Deatherage,et al.  The Masking of Tones by White Noise as a Function of the Interaural Phases of Both Components. I. 500 Cycles , 1952 .

[26]  Laurence R. Harris,et al.  Auditory and visual neurons in the cat's superior colliculus selective for the direction of apparent motion stimuli , 1989, Brain Research.

[27]  D W Grantham,et al.  Detection and discrimination of simulated motion of auditory targets in the horizontal plane. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  D W Grantham,et al.  Detectability of tonal signals with changing interaural phase differences in noise. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  R. Payne Acoustic location of prey by barn owls (Tyto alba). , 1971, The Journal of experimental biology.