The Impact of Inequality on Cooperation: An Experimental Study

This paper analyzes the impact of inequality in the distribution of endowments on contributions. We conduct a lab experiment using the well-known Public Good Game to test the relation between inequality and contribution to a public fund. We introduce the possibility to choose among three different redistribution rules: equidistribution, proportional to contribution and progressive to endowment. This novelty, combined with a payoff function that depends also on previous period behavior, allows us to verify the hypothesis that players show inequity averse preferences. Results show that inequality has a negative impact on individual contribution. Since inequality is decreasing during repetitions, we deduce that players show inequity averse preferences.

[1]  D. Balliet.  Communication and Cooperation in Social Dilemmas: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2010 .

[2]  Juan Camilo Cárdenas,et al.  Real wealth and experimental cooperation: experiments in the field lab , 2003 .

[3]  E. Fehr,et al.  Fairness and Retaliation: The Economics of Reciprocity , 2000, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[4]  James Andreoni,et al.  Why free ride?: Strategies and learning in public goods experiments , 1988 .

[5]  R. Mark Isaac,et al.  Divergent evidence on free riding: An experimental examination of possible explanations , 1984 .

[6]  Rachel T. A. Croson.  Theories of Commitment, Altruism and Reciprocity: Evidence from Linear Public Goods Games , 2007 .

[7]  C. Bicchieri,et al.  Computer-mediated communication and cooperation in social dilemmas: an experimental analysis , 2007 .

[8]  R. Mark Isaac,et al.  Group Size Effects in Public Goods Provision: The Voluntary Contributions Mechanism , 1988 .

[9]  L. Putterman,et al.  Communication and punishment in voluntary contribution experiments , 2006 .

[10]  Todd L. Cherry,et al.  The Impact of Endowment Heterogeneity and Origin on Public Good Contributions: Evidence From the Lab , 2005 .

[11]  P. Samuelson.  The Pure Theory of Public Expanditure , 1954 .

[12]  E. Fehr.  A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation , 1998 .

[13]  Lisa R. Anderson,et al.  Inequality and public good provision: An experimental analysis , 2008 .

[14]  Klaus M. Schmidt,et al.  The Economics of Fairness, Reciprocity and Altruism--Experimental Evidence and New Theories. , 2005 .

[15]  Accounting for real wealth in heterogeneous-endowment public good games , 2011 .

[16]  Shachar Kariv,et al.  Individual Preferences for Giving , 2005 .

[17]  J. Andreoni.  IMPURE ALTRUISM AND DONATIONS TO PUBLIC GOODS: A THEORY OF WARM-GLOW GIVING* , 1990 .

[18]  M. Visser,et al.  INCOME INEQUALITY, RECIPROCITY AND PUBLIC GOOD PROVISION: AN EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS , 2007 .

[19]  F. Mengel,et al.  Growth and Inequality in Public Good Games , 2014, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[20]  G. Marwell,et al.  Economists free ride, does anyone else? : Experiments on the provision of public goods, IV , 1981 .

[21]  Self-interest, sympathy and the origin of endowments , 2008 .

[22]  Ramzi Suleiman,et al.  Incremental Contribution in Step-Level Public Goods Games with Asymmetric Players , 1993 .

[23]  Kenneth S. Chan,et al.  Heterogeneity and the Voluntary Provision of Public Goods , 1999 .

[24]  Rachel T. A. Croson,et al.  Income and wealth heterogeneity in the voluntary provision of linear public goods , 2006 .

[25]  U. Fischbacher.  z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments , 1999 .

[26]  R. Mark Isaac,et al.  Heterogenous demand for public goods: Behavior in the voluntary contributions mechanism , 1995 .

[27]  Matthias Sutter,et al.  Equality, Equity and Incentives: An Experiment , 2013, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[28]  Anthony A. Smith,et al.  Income and Wealth Heterogeneity in the , 1998 .

[29]  Wolfgang J. Luhan,et al.  Cedex Discussion Paper Series , 2022 .