Initial control component in disparity vergence eye movements

Recent experimental evidence indicates that a portion of the oculomotor response to disparity stimulation is functionally open‐loop; that is, the response occurs without the aid of visual feedback. To investigate the stimulus features that elicit or influence this dynamic movement, convergence responses to a step, a step followed by target disappearance, and a pulse followed by target disappearance were obtained from four subjects using infrared oculography. The target was a thin vertical line (0.25) either 2 or 10 in height. Stimuli having different amplitudes (1. 2, 4 and 8) and disappearance times (50. 100 and 200ms) were selected randomly along with occasional divergent stimuli to minimize prediction and voluntary vergence. Experiments showed that the dynamic characteristics of the initial portion of the response were essentially the same, even when the target disappeared before the movement took place. The magnitude of the initial response depended on the stimulus amplitude, but was not influenced by either stimulus duration or target height. For example, stimulus durations as short as 50 ms elicited responses similar to those caused by standard steps. The initial response was shown to be active over a well‐defined time period of about 200 ms. after which the response appears to be mediated by a visually‐guided control component. These results support the recently developed dual‐mode theory of vergence control in which an initial preprogrammed (open‐loop) control component is followed by a feedback (closed‐loop) controlled component which reduces any remaining disparity.

[1]  P. A. Ward,et al.  Effect of pupil size on steady state accommodation , 1985, Vision Research.

[2]  L. Stark,et al.  The main sequence, a tool for studying human eye movements , 1975 .

[3]  Lawrence W. Stark,et al.  Dynamical Characteristics of the Fusional Vergence Eye-Movement System , 1968, IEEE Trans. Syst. Sci. Cybern..

[4]  John Semmlow,et al.  Dynamic accommodative vergence components in binocular vision , 1976, Vision Research.

[5]  J. Semmlow,et al.  Vergence control of central and peripheral disparities , 1991, Experimental Neurology.

[6]  R Jones,et al.  Fusional vergence: sustained and transient components. , 1980, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[7]  J Semmlow,et al.  Dynamic contributions of the components of binocular vergence. , 1979, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[8]  Clifton M. Schor,et al.  The relationship between fusional vergence eye movements and fixation disparity , 1979, Vision Research.

[9]  G. Westheimer,et al.  Disjunctive eye movements , 1961, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  George K. Hung,et al.  A Quantitative Theory of Control Sharing Between Accommodative and Vergence Controllers , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  K N OGLE,et al.  Further considerations of fixation disparity and the binocular fusional processes. , 1951, American journal of ophthalmology.

[12]  G K Hung,et al.  Identification of accommodative vergence contribution to the near response using response variance. , 1983, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[13]  V. V. Krishnan,et al.  A Heuristic Model for the Human Vergence Eye Movement System , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  George K. Hung,et al.  A Dual-Mode Dynamic Model of the Vergence Eye Movement System , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.