Evaluating the Interoperability of Urban Air Mobility Systems and Airports

This paper investigates how existing arrival and departure procedures can be directly used or adapted to enable high-volume instrument and visual urban air mobility (UAM) flight operations at major airports in the United States. Viable procedures are restricted to those that enable simultaneous and non-interfering UAM flights with conventional aircraft operations. Air traffic controller workload is proposed as the critical integration barrier to scale UAM operations in visual conditions whereas separation minima, especially for approach procedures, is proposed as the critical barrier in instrument conditions. A systems approach is taken to evaluate potential integration strategies for UAM in which the location of UAM runways or vertipads and flight procedures are presented in a topological framework. The benefits, challenges, and notional application of five integration schemes are discussed. Four promising procedures for UAM are introduced through case studies at three airports. Findings indicate that multiple procedures exist to support high-volume UAM integration at major airports under current regulations with additional controller staffing, especially if UAM aircraft exhibit helicopter-like performance.

[1]  R J Taborek,et al.  STOL, A KEY TO AIRPORT ACCESS-STOL PORT DESIGN AND OPERATING CONSIDERATIONS , 1968 .

[2]  Henk A. P. Blom,et al.  ACCIDENT RISK ASSESSMENT OF SIMULTANEOUS CONVERGING INSTRUMENT APPROACHES , 2003 .

[3]  Mark Hutchins,et al.  TRB Special Report: The Federal Aviation Administration’s Approach for Determining Future Air Traffic Controller Staffing Needs , 2015 .

[4]  David P. Thipphavong,et al.  Analysis of Interactions Between Urban Air Mobility (UAM) Operations and Conventional Traffic in Urban Areas: Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS) Study for UAM Operations , 2019 .

[5]  Jonathan Histon,et al.  Introducing Structural Considerations into Complexity Metrics , 2001 .

[6]  John Wang,et al.  ADS-B mixed SUAS and NAS system capacity analysis and DAA performance , 2018, 2018 Integrated Communications, Navigation, Surveillance Conference (ICNS).

[7]  Marcus Johnson,et al.  Unmanned Aircraft System Traffic Management (UTM) Concept of Operations , 2016 .

[8]  R. A. Fitzek Lessons Gained in Helicopter Air Traffic Control from Federal Aviation Agency Activities , 1962, The Journal of the Royal Aeronautical Society.

[9]  A. S. Crossfield STOL Demonstration Program , 1969 .

[10]  Parker D. Vascik Systems Analysis of Urban Air Mobility Operational Scaling , 2020 .

[11]  E.C. Smith Impact of RNAV terminal procedures on controller workload , 2005, 24th Digital Avionics Systems Conference.

[12]  Aaron McFadyen,et al.  Terminal airspace modelling for unmanned aircraft systems integration , 2016, 2016 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS).

[13]  Parker D. Vascik,et al.  Assessing Integration Between Emerging and Conventional Operations in Urban Airspace , 2019 .

[14]  Complexity and Controller Workload : Trying to Bridge the Gap , 2002 .

[15]  Fast-Forwarding to a Future of On-Demand Urban Air Transportation , 2016 .

[16]  Rohit Goyal,et al.  Urban Air Mobility (UAM) Market Study , 2018 .

[17]  Tamsyn Edwards,et al.  Exploration of Near term Potential Routes and Procedures for Urban Air Mobility , 2019 .

[18]  Greg Orrell,et al.  ADS-B Surveillance System Performance With Small UAS at Low Altitudes , 2017 .