New cochlear implant research coding strategy based on the MP3000™ strategy to reintroduce the virtual channel effect

Abstract Conclusion: Results for speech recognition in noise tests when using a new research coding strategy designed to introduce the virtual channel effect provided no advantage over MP3000™. Although statistically significant smaller just noticeable differences (JNDs) were obtained, the findings for pitch ranking proved to have little clinical impact. Objectives: The aim of this study was to explore whether modifications to MP3000 by including sequential virtual channel stimulation would lead to further improvements in hearing, particularly for speech recognition in background noise and in competing-talker conditions, and to compare results for pitch perception and melody recognition, as well as informally collect subjective impressions on strategy preference. Methods: Nine experienced cochlear implant subjects were recruited for the prospective study. Two variants of the experimental strategy were compared to MP3000. The study design was a single-blinded ABCCBA cross-over trial paradigm with 3 weeks of take-home experience for each user condition. Results: Comparing results of pitch-ranking, a significantly reduced JND was identified. No significant effect of coding strategy on speech understanding in noise or competing-talker materials was found. Melody recognition skills were the same under all user conditions.

[1]  Thomas Lenarz,et al.  Investigation of pitch discrimination and the effect of learning for virtual channels realized by current steering , 2009, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[2]  Thomas Lenarz,et al.  The Advanced Bionics High Resolution Mode: Stimulation rates up to 5000 pps , 2010, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[3]  Mark E. Lutman,et al.  Sparse coding for cochlear implants , 2011 .

[4]  J J Hanekom,et al.  Place pitch discrimination and speech recognition in cochlear implant users. , 1996, The South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings.

[5]  E. Javel,et al.  Stochastic properties of cat auditory nerve responses to electric and acoustic stimuli and application to intensity discrimination. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  H J McDermott,et al.  Speech processing for multichannel cochlear implants: variations of the Spectral Maxima Sound Processor strategy. , 1994, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[7]  Thomas Lenarz,et al.  Current Steering and Results From Novel Speech Coding Strategies , 2008, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[8]  Matthijs Killian,et al.  Clinical evaluation of cochlear implant sound coding taking into account conjectural masking functions, MP3000™ , 2011, Cochlear implants international.

[9]  NogueiraWaldo,et al.  A psychoacoustic "NofM"-type speech coding strategy for cochlear implants , 2005 .

[10]  Mark Downing,et al.  Current Steering Creates Additional Pitch Percepts in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients , 2007, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[11]  Chris van den Honert,et al.  Dual-electrode pitch discrimination with sequential interleaved stimulation by cochlear implant users. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Dirk Van Compernolle,et al.  Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  R. K. Kalkman,et al.  Simultaneous and non-simultaneous dual electrode stimulation in cochlear implants: evidence for two neural response modalities , 2009, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[14]  Speech Processors for Auditory Prostheses , 2001 .

[15]  Gail S Donaldson,et al.  Within-Subjects Comparison of the HiRes and Fidelity120 Speech Processing Strategies: Speech Perception and Its Relation to Place-Pitch Sensitivity , 2011, Ear and hearing.

[16]  Thomas Lenarz,et al.  A Psychoacoustic "NofM"-Type Speech Coding Strategy for Cochlear Implants , 2005, EURASIP J. Adv. Signal Process..

[17]  Kerrie L Plant,et al.  Dual Electrode Stimulation Using the Nucleus CI24RE Cochlear Implant: Electrode Impedance and Pitch Ranking Studies , 2005, Ear and hearing.

[18]  Robert K. Shepherd,et al.  Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve III. Response initiation sites and temporal fine structure , 2000, Hearing Research.

[19]  A. Winkler,et al.  Hörgeräteindikation und -überprüfung nach modernen Verfahren der Sprachaudiometrie im Deutschen , 2011, HNO.

[20]  Hugh J. McDermott,et al.  Investigating cochlear implant place-pitch perception with the Modified Melodies test , 2009, Cochlear implants international.