Mechanical Characterization of Two Blends PP+PA6+EPDM. Part 2. Results of Tensile Tests

This paper presents the values of several mechanical characteristics for two blends: H (60% PP + 12% PA6 + 8% EPDM + 20% Polybond 3200) and G (20% PP + 42% PA6 + 28% EPDM + 10% Polybond 3200) (%wt), comparing them to those of PP (polypropylene) and PA6 (polyamide 6). The adding of EPDM (ethylene propylene diene monomer rubber) and Polybond 3200 help reducing the disadvantages of simple blends made of PP+PA6, when the PA6 concentration allows for having a PA6 matrix with droplets of PP. SEM analysis helps for understanding the performance of material G as compared to the neat polymers. EDX analysis proved that there was a matrix inversion, material H having a PP matrix and material G a matrix made of PA6 with droplets of PP. Strain at break for PP and material H were proved to be insensitive to test speed, but materials G and PA6 had large value for strain at break and energy at break for v = 10 mm/min. Taking at basis the values for polyamide 6 (PA6), material G has greater values for energy at break: with 97.8% for v = 10 mm/min, with 29.5% for v= 250 mm/min and with 98% for 1000 mm/min, without exhibiting the micro and macro cavitation of PA6. This means that the recipe, the technology and the mechanical characteristics make material G a potential candidate for applications where a low and moderate impact resistant material is required.

[1]  L. Deleanu,et al.  Numerical and Experimental Results on Charpy Tests for Blends Polypropylene + Polyamide + Ethylene Propylene Diene Monomer (PP + PA + EPDM) , 2020, Materials.

[2]  M. Hasanpour,et al.  The effect of rubber functionality on the phase morphology, mechanical performance and toughening mechanisms of highly toughened PP/PA6/EPDM ternary blends , 2019, Polymer Testing.

[3]  Wei Yang,et al.  Effect of Cross-Linking Degree of EPDM Phase on the Morphology Evolution and Crystallization Behavior of Thermoplastic Vulcanizates Based on Polyamide 6 (PA6)/Ethylene-Propylene-Diene Rubber (EPDM) Blends , 2019, Polymers.

[4]  Jia‐Horng Lin,et al.  Impact-resistant polypropylene/thermoplastic polyurethane blends: compatible effects of maleic anhydride on thermal degradation properties and crystallization behaviors , 2019, Journal of Materials Research and Technology.

[5]  L. Deleanu,et al.  TENSILE TESTS FOR POLYAMIDE 6 AND POLYPROPILENE , 2019, Mechanical Testing and Diagnosis.

[6]  L. Botta,et al.  Compatibilization of Polypropylene/Polyamide 6 Blend Fibers Using Photo-Oxidized Polypropylene , 2018, Materials.

[7]  Q. Fu,et al.  A comparison study of high shear force and compatibilizer on the phase morphologies and properties of polypropylene/polylactide (PP/PLA) blends , 2018, Polymer.

[8]  J. C. Merino,et al.  Sepiolite as replacement of short glass fibre in polyamide composites for injection moulding applications , 2018, Applied Clay Science.

[9]  A. Galeski,et al.  Cavitation phenomenon and mechanical properties of partially disentangled polypropylene , 2018, Polymer.

[10]  M. Nie,et al.  Polypropylene/polyamide blend featuring mechanical interlocking via controlled interfacial diffusion and recrystallization , 2017 .

[11]  A. Müller,et al.  Tailoring the properties of PP/PA6 nanostructured blends by the addition of nanosilica and compatibilizer agents , 2016 .

[12]  J. García-Martínez,et al.  Understanding the Morphological Changes in the Polypropylene/Polyamide 6 Fifty/Fifty Blends by Interfacial Modifiers Based on Grafted Atactic Polypropylenes: Microscopic, Mechanical, and Thermal Characterization , 2015 .

[13]  Ming‐bo Yang,et al.  Effect of the core-forming polymer on phase morphology and mechanical properties of PA6/EPDM-g-MA/HDPE ternary blends , 2015 .

[14]  C. Nicolae,et al.  Micro- and nano-mechanical characterization of polyamide 11 and its composites containing cellulose nanofibers , 2013 .

[15]  P. Dubois,et al.  The influence of nanosilica on the nucleation, crystallization and tensile properties of PP–PC and PP–PA blends , 2013 .

[16]  D. García-López,et al.  How do the shape of clay and type of modifier affect properties of polymer blends , 2013 .

[17]  P. Ravishankar TREATISE ON EPDM , 2012 .

[18]  Chen Chen,et al.  Cocontinuous morphology of immiscible high density polyethylene/polyamide 6 blend induced by multiwalled carbon nanotubes network , 2012 .

[19]  K. Sharma Polymer Thermodynamics: Blends, Copolymers and Reversible Polymerization , 2011 .

[20]  M. Duin,et al.  Morphology development and phase inversion during dynamic vulcanisation of EPDM/PP blends , 2011 .

[21]  Dong Wang,et al.  Compatibilization and morphology development of immiscible ternary polymer blends , 2011 .

[22]  J. Fernández,et al.  Effect of organic modification of sepiolite for PA 6 polymer/organoclay nanocomposites , 2010 .

[23]  Yuejun Liu,et al.  Compatibilizing effect of maleated polypropylene on the mechanical properties of injection molded polypropylene/polyamide 6/functionalized-TiO2 nanocomposites , 2009 .

[24]  C. Wan,et al.  Investigation on morphology and mechanical properties of polyamide 6/maleated ethylene-propylene-diene rubber/organoclay composites , 2009 .

[25]  Y. Mai,et al.  Effects of particle size, particle/matrix interface adhesion and particle loading on mechanical properties of particulate–polymer composites , 2008 .

[26]  Rochmadi,et al.  Influence of SEBS-g-MA on morphology, mechanical, and thermal properties of PA6/PP/organoclay nanocomposites , 2008 .

[27]  D. Acierno,et al.  The role of organoclay in promoting co-continuous morphology in high-density poly(ethylene)/poly(amide) 6 blends , 2008 .

[28]  I. Kelnar,et al.  Effect of clay treatment on structure and mechanical behavior of elastomer-containing polyamide 6 nanocomposite , 2007 .

[29]  D. García-López,et al.  Study of melt compounding conditions and characterization of polyamide 6/metallocene ethylene-polypropylene-diene copolymer/maleated ethylene-polypropylene-diene copolymer blends reinforced with layered silicates , 2007 .

[30]  Q. Fu,et al.  Effect of temperature and strain rate on the tensile deformation of polyamide 6 , 2007 .

[31]  Q. Fu,et al.  Effects of clay on phase morphology and mechanical properties in polyamide 6/EPDM-g-MA/organoclay ternary nanocomposites , 2007 .

[32]  D. R. Paul,et al.  Rubber toughening of nylon 6 nanocomposites , 2006 .

[33]  Mat Uzir Wahit,et al.  The Effect of Polyethylene-Octene Elastomer on the Morphological and Mechanical Properties of Polyamide 6/Polypropylene Nanocomposites , 2005 .

[34]  L. Robeson Polymer Blends: A Comprehensive Review , 2005 .

[35]  S. Amico,et al.  Tensile and impact behavior of polypropylene/low density polyethylene blends , 2005 .

[36]  S. Bai,et al.  Polypropylene/polyamide 6/polyethylene–octene elastomer blends. Part 2: volume dilatation during plastic deformation under uniaxial tension , 2004 .

[37]  S. Bai,et al.  Microstructures and mechanical properties of polypropylene/polyamide 6/polyethelene-octene elastomer blends , 2004 .

[38]  József Karger-Kocsis,et al.  Compatibilizing effect of maleated polypropylene on the mechanical properties and morphology of injection molded polyamide 6/polypropylene/organoclay nanocomposites , 2003 .

[39]  C. G'sell,et al.  Experimental characterization of deformation damage in solid polymers under tension, and its interrelation with necking , 2002 .

[40]  Roger Brown Handbook of Polymer Testing: Short-Term Mechanical Tests , 1997 .

[41]  J. W. Barlow Polymer blends and alloys , 1993 .

[42]  R. Bradley Radiation Technology Handbook , 1984 .

[43]  Bo-ming Zhang,et al.  Interfacial adhesion and shear behaviors of aramid fiber/polyamide 6 composites under different thermal treatments , 2020 .

[44]  Polymer Blends , 2019, Polymers and Polymeric Composites: A Reference Series.

[45]  Teza De Doctorat,et al.  Universitatea „Dunărea de Jos” din Galaţi , 2018 .

[46]  A. Ficai,et al.  Polyamide/Polypropylene/graphene oxide nanocomposites with functional compatibilizers: Morpho-structural and physico-mechanical characterization , 2017 .

[47]  Z. Ishak,et al.  Polyamide blend-based nanocomposites: A review , 2015 .

[48]  Dunărea de Jos,et al.  Influence of Interface Quality on Stress and Strain Distribution in a Micro Cell of a Composite , 2015 .

[49]  S. Ramazani,et al.  Melt preparation and investigation of properties of toughened Polyamide 66 with SEBS-g-MA and their nanocomposites , 2008 .

[50]  C. Han Rheology and processing of polymeric materials , 2007 .

[51]  Leszek A. Utracki,et al.  Polymer Blends Handbook , 2003 .

[52]  S. F. Xavier Properties and Performance of Polymer Blends , 2003 .

[53]  L. Utracki History of commercial polymer alloys and blends (from a perspective of the patent literature) , 1995 .

[54]  D. R. Paul,et al.  Impact-modified nylon 6/polypropylene blends: 3. Deformation mechanisms , 1995 .

[55]  R. Arridge,et al.  Theoretical aspects of polymer blends and alloys , 1993 .

[56]  P. F. Onyon Polymer Handbook , 1972, Nature.