Comparison of diagnosis of early retinal lesions of diabetic retinopathy between a computer system and human experts.

OBJECTIVE To investigate whether a computer vision system is comparable with humans in detecting early retinal lesions of diabetic retinopathy using color fundus photographs. METHODS A computer system has been developed using image processing and pattern recognition techniques to detect early lesions of diabetic retinopathy (hemorrhages and microaneurysms, hard exudates, and cotton-wool spots). Color fundus photographs obtained from American Indians in Oklahoma were used in developing and testing the system. A set of 369 color fundus slides were used to train the computer system using 3 diagnostic categories: lesions present, questionable, or absent (Y/Q/N). A different set of 428 slides were used to test and evaluate the system, and its diagnostic results were compared with those of 2 human experts-the grader at the University of Wisconsin Fundus Photograph Reading Center (Madison) and a general ophthalmologist. The experiments included comparisons using 3 (Y/Q/N) and 2 diagnostic categories (Y/N) (questionable cases excluded in the latter). RESULTS In the training phase, the agreement rates, sensitivity, and specificity in detecting the 3 lesions between the retinal specialist and the computer system were all above 90%. The kappa statistics were high (0.75-0.97), indicating excellent agreement between the specialist and the computer system. In the testing phase, the results obtained between the computer system and human experts were consistent with those of the training phase, and they were comparable with those between the human experts. CONCLUSIONS The performance of the computer vision system in diagnosing early retinal lesions was comparable with that of human experts. Therefore, this mobile, electronically easily accessible, and noninvasive computer system, could become a mass screening tool and a clinical aid in diagnosing early lesions of diabetic retinopathy.

[1]  R H Eikelboom,et al.  Tele-ophthalmic screening using digital imaging devices. , 1998, Australian and New Zealand journal of ophthalmology.

[2]  M. C. Leske,et al.  Comparison of diabetic retinopathy detection by clinical examinations and photograph gradings. Barbados (West Indies) Eye Study Group. , 1993, Archives of ophthalmology.

[3]  M. Cohen,et al.  Effect of Diabetes on In Vivo Metabolism of [35S]-labeled Glomerular Basement Membrane , 1984, Diabetes.

[4]  W. Grove Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions, 2nd ed , 1981 .

[5]  T. Parsley,et al.  The prevalence and risk of diabetic retinopathy among Indians of southwest Oklahoma. , 1989, The Journal of the Oklahoma State Medical Association.

[6]  K. M. West,et al.  A Detailed Study of Risk Factors for Retinopathy and Nephropathy in Diabetes , 1980, Diabetes.

[7]  R. Klein,et al.  Comparison between ophthalmoscopy and fundus photography in determining severity of diabetic retinopathy. , 1985, Ophthalmology.

[8]  J. Welch,et al.  Instant electronic imaging systems are superior to polaroid at detecting sight‐threatening diabetic retinopathy , 1998, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[9]  A E Leure-duPree,et al.  Electron-opaque inclusions in the rat retinal pigment epithelium after treatment with chelators of zinc. , 1981, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[10]  E. Kohner,et al.  Quantitative Evaluation of Fluorescein Angiograms: Microaneurysm Counts , 1983, Diabetes.

[11]  T. Williamson,et al.  Automatic detection of diabetic retinopathy using an artificial neural network: a screening tool. , 1996, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[12]  Peter F Sharp,et al.  A fully automated comparative microaneurysm digital detection system , 1997, Eye.

[13]  Elisa Lee,et al.  Development of Proliferative Retinopathy in NIDDM: A Follow-up Study of American Indians in Oklahoma , 1992, Diabetes.

[14]  N. Asal,et al.  Diabetic Retinopathy in Oklahoma Indians With NIDDM: Incidence and risk factors , 1992, Diabetes Care.

[15]  N. Asal,et al.  The diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmoscopy versus fundus photography. , 1993, Ophthalmology.

[16]  Diabetic retinopathy. Assessment of severity and progression. , 1984, Ophthalmology.

[17]  D R Owens,et al.  Screening for diabetic retinopathy by general practitioners: ophthalmoscopy or retinal photography as 35 mm colour transparencies? , 1998, Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association.

[18]  D L DeMets,et al.  The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy. IX. Four-year incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy when age at diagnosis is less than 30 years. , 1989, Archives of ophthalmology.

[19]  Prevalence and incidence of diabetes mellitus--United States, 1980-1987. , 1990, MMWR. Morbidity and mortality weekly report.

[20]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1973 .

[21]  C. Leverton Stereo photography in the operating theatre. , 1996 .